Literature DB >> 27433911

The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.

Kenji Inaba1, Obi Okoye, Hande Aksoy, Dimitra Skiada, Glenn Ault, Stephen Sener, Lydia Lam, Elizabeth Benjamin, Demetrios Demetriades.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the ability of radio frequency detection (RFD) system-embedded sponges to mitigate the incidence of retained surgical sponges (RSS) after emergency surgery.
BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery patients are at high risk for retained foreign bodies.
METHODS: All emergent trauma and nontrauma cavitary operations over a 5-year period (January 2010-December 2014) were prospectively enrolled. For damage-control procedures, only the definitive closure was included. RFD sponges were used exclusively throughout the study period. Before closure, the sponge and instrument count was followed by RFD scanning and x-ray evaluation for retained sponges. RSS and near-misses averted using the RFD system were analyzed.
RESULTS: In all, 2051 patients [median (range)], aged 41 (1-101) years, 72.2% male, 46.8% trauma patients, underwent 2148 operations (1824 laparotomy, 100 thoracotomy, 30 sternotomy, and 97 combined). RFD detected retained sponges in 11 (0.5%) patients (81.8%laparotomy, 18.2% sternotomy) before cavitary closure. All postclosure x-rays were negative. No retained sponges were missed by the RFD system. Body mass index was 29 (23-43), estimated blood loss 1.0 L (0-23), and operating room time 160 minutes (71-869). Procedures started after 18:00 to 06:00 hours in 45.5% of the patients. The sponge count was incorrect in 36.4%, not performed due to time constraints in 45.5%, and correct in 18.2%. The additional cost of using RFD-embedded disposables was $0.17 for a 4X18 laparotomy sponge and $0.46 for a 10 pack of 12ply, 4X8.
CONCLUSIONS: Emergent surgical procedures are high-risk for retained sponges, even when sponge counts are performed and found to be correct. Implementation of a RFD system was effective in preventing this complication and should be considered for emergent operations in an effort to improve patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27433911     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

1.  Rates of Serious Surgical Errors in California and Plans to Prevent Recurrence.

Authors:  Andrew J Cohen; Hansen Lui; Micha Zheng; Bhagat Cheema; German Patino; Michael A Kohn; Anthony Enriquez; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

2.  Three years evaluation of retained foreign bodies after surgery in Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Zarenezhad; Saeed Gholamzadeh; Arya Hedjazi; Kamran Soltani; Jaber Gharehdaghi; Masoud Ghadipasha; Seyyed Mohammad Vahid Hosseini; Ahmad Zare
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-25

3.  Retained surgical sponges: a descriptive study of 319 occurrences and contributing factors from 2012 to 2017.

Authors:  Victoria M Steelman; Clarissa Shaw; Laurel Shine; Abbey J Hardy-Fairbanks
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2018-06-29

4.  A Socio-Technical Exploration for Reducing & Mitigating the Risk of Retained Foreign Objects.

Authors:  Siobhán Corrigan; Alison Kay; Katie O'Byrne; Dubhfeasa Slattery; Sharon Sheehan; Nick McDonald; David Smyth; Ken Mealy; Sam Cromie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Retained Surgical Sponge Presenting Four Decades Later as a Rapidly Growing Soft Tissue Mass.

Authors:  Adriana Y Koek
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2020-01-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.