Literature DB >> 27433786

Randomized trial finds that prostate cancer genetic risk score feedback targets prostate-specific antigen screening among at-risk men.

Aubrey R Turner1, Brian R Lane2,3, Dan Rogers4, Isaac Lipkus5, Kathryn Weaver6, Suzanne C Danhauer6, Zheng Zhang1, Fang-Chi Hsu7, Sabrina L Noyes2, Tamara Adams1, Helga Toriello2, Thomas Monroe2, Trudy McKanna2, Tracey Young1, Ryan Rodarmer2, Richard J Kahnoski2, Mouafak Tourojman2, A Karim Kader8, S Lilly Zheng1, William Baer9, Jianfeng Xu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening may reduce death due to prostate cancer but leads to the overdiagnosis of many cases of indolent cancer. Targeted use of PSA screening may reduce overdiagnosis. Multimarker genomic testing shows promise for risk assessment and could be used to target PSA screening.
METHODS: To test whether counseling based on the family history (FH) and counseling based on a genetic risk score (GRS) plus FH would differentially affect subsequent PSA screening at 3 months (primary outcome), a randomized trial of FH versus GRS plus FH was conducted with 700 whites aged 40 to 49 years without prior PSA screening. Secondary outcomes included anxiety, recall, physician discussion at 3 months, and PSA screening at 3 years. Pictographs versus numeric presentations of genetic risk were also evaluated.
RESULTS: At 3 months, no significant differences were observed in the rates of PSA screening between the FH arm (2.1%) and the GRS-FH arm (4.5% with GRS-FH vs. 2.1% with FH: χ2 = 3.13, P = .077); however, PSA screening rates at 3 months significantly increased with given risk in the GRS-FH arm (P = .013). Similar results were observed for discussions with physicians at 3 months and PSA screening at 3 years. Average anxiety levels decreased after the individual cancer risk was provided (P = .0007), with no differences between groups. Visual presentation by pictographs did not significantly alter comprehension or anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS: This is likely the first randomized trial of multimarker genomic testing to report genomic targeting of cancer screening. This study found little evidence of concern about excess anxiety or overuse/underuse of PSA screening when multimarker genetic risks were provided to patients. Cancer 2016;122:3564-3575.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic counseling; genetic risk score; genetic testing; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening; randomized controlled trial

Year:  2016        PMID: 27433786      PMCID: PMC5247411          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  33 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening: facts, statistics, and interpretation in response to the US Preventive Services Task Force Review.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Andrew J Vickers; Monique Roobol; James Eastham; Peter Scardino; Hans Lilja; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models.

Authors:  Sholom Wacholder; Patricia Hartge; Ross Prentice; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Heather Spencer Feigelson; W Ryan Diver; Michael J Thun; David G Cox; Susan E Hankinson; Peter Kraft; Bernard Rosner; Christine D Berg; Louise A Brinton; Jolanta Lissowska; Mark E Sherman; Rowan Chlebowski; Charles Kooperberg; Rebecca D Jackson; Dennis W Buckman; Peter Hui; Ruth Pfeiffer; Kevin B Jacobs; Gilles D Thomas; Robert N Hoover; Mitchell H Gail; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Utility of genome-wide association study findings: prostate cancer as a translational research paradigm.

Authors:  A R Turner; A K Kader; J Xu
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Estimation of absolute risk for prostate cancer using genetic markers and family history.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu; Jielin Sun; A Karim Kader; Sara Lindström; Fredrik Wiklund; Fang-Chi Hsu; Jan-Erik Johansson; S Lilly Zheng; Gilles Thomas; Richard B Hayes; Peter Kraft; David J Hunter; Stephen J Chanock; William B Isaacs; Henrik Grönberg
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Family history and the risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  G D Steinberg; B S Carter; T H Beaty; B Childs; P C Walsh
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; L Adrienne Cupples; Norman R Relkin; Peter J Whitehouse; Tamsen Brown; Susan LaRusse Eckert; Melissa Butson; A Dessa Sadovnick; Kimberly A Quaid; Clara Chen; Robert Cook-Deegan; Lindsay A Farrer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prostate-specific antigen screening in elderly men.

Authors:  Grace Lu-Yao; Therese A Stukel; Siu-Long Yao
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Landmarks in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Brian Zikmund-Fisher; Peter Ubel; Aleksandra Jancovic; Todd Lucas; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-08-27

10.  The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Jan C Oosterwijk; Christi J van Asperen; Fred H Menko; Caroline F Ockhuysen-Vermey; Piet J Kostense; Liesbeth Claassen; Daniëlle Rm Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clarifying the Trade-Offs of Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Study.

Authors:  Nathaniel Hendrix; Roman Gulati; Boshen Jiao; A Karim Kader; Stephen T Ryan; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Prostate cancer screening-when to start and how to screen?

Authors:  Kimia Kohestani; Marina Chilov; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.