Additions to the genera Asterolibertia and Cirsosia (Asterinaceae, Asterinales), with particular reference to species from the Brazilian Cerrado.

Four new Asterolibertia species and a new variety of Cirsosia splendida, all found on native Cerrado plants, belonging to three host families are described, illustrated and named as: A. bahiensis sp. nov. on Erythroxylum sp. (Erythroxylaceae); A. barrinhensis sp. nov. on Diospyros burchellii (Ebenaceae); A. campograndensis sp. nov. on Hirtella glandulosa (Chrysobalanaceae); A. parinaricola sp. nov. on Parinari obtusifolia (Chrysobalanaceae); and Cirsosia splendida var. laevigata var. nov., showing both sexual and asexual morphs, on H. glandulosa and H. gracilipes (Chrysobalanaceae). Finally, A. licaniae is reported on a new host, H. gracilipes. Keys to all the known species of Asterolibertia and Cirsosia are included.

INTRODUCTION

Molecular data are generally unavailable for members of Asterinaceae and the taxonomy of most genera in this family to date relies chiefly on morphological data. That is the case of Asterolibertia and Cirsosia. Overcoming this limitation will depend on recollecting the taxa described in the past and where appropriate epitypifying these after extracting and sequencing genomic DNA. There have been a few cases where this was performed successfully from old herbarium specimens (Telle & Thines 2008, O’Gorman , Hawksworth 2013, Guatimosim , Thomas ).

The genera of Asterinaceae are presently segregated using well-defined morphological characters, such as the presence or absence of appressoria on the external mycelium, setae on ascomata and/or on the external mycelium, appressorium type (intercalary or lateral), and ascospore septation (Bezerra 2004, Hosagoudar 2012). Within the family, only three genera have intercalary appressoria: Asterolibertia, Cirsosia, and Bheemamyces (Arnaud 1918, Bezerra 2004, Hosagoudar 2010, 2012). However, in Bheemamyces the appressoria are both lateral and intercalary (Hosagoudar ).

For almost a century, Asterolibertia was considered a well-supported genus, due to the presence of intercalary appressoria as originally established by Arnaud (1918), and this has been always regarded as a strong morphological character. However, Hongsanan , without any molecular basis and morphological justification, recombined species of Asterolibertia into Asterina, a genus with species showing only lateral appressoria. Such recombinations must be regarded as questionable, particularly in the absence of molecular data.

Currently, Asterolibertia includes 35 species (Tables 1–2) found only in the tropics and mainly on the host families Chrysobalanaceae, Malpighiaceae, and Rubiaceae (Hosagoudar 2010, Farr & Rossman 2015). The genus Cirsosia accommodates 15 species and one variety, all from the tropics (Tables 3–4), found mainly on Arecaceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Dipterocarpaceae, and Malpighiaceae (Hosagoudar 2010, Farr & Rossman 2015).

Table 1.

Morphometric characteristics of Asterolibertia species (μm), including five new ones described in this study.

Asterolibertia Species	Ascomata	Hyphae	Appressoria	Asci	Ascospores	Source and country
anisopterae (Syd. & P. Syd.) Hansf.	< 800 × 300–450	6–7	15–20 × 10–15	50–70 × 45–55	28–38 × 17–22	Hansford (1949), Philippines
bahiensis Firmino, Inácio & Dianese	175–235	4–5	14–17.5 × 9–10	35–52.5 × 30–42.5	32.5–37.5 × 10–14	Present study, Brazil
bakeri (Syd. & P. Syd.) Hansf.	< 350	3–5	10–15 × 5–8	50–70 × 30–40	26–36 × 12–14	Hansford (1949), Philippines
barrinhensis Firmino & Dianese	105–167.5	4–5	9–15 × 7.5–10	30–42.5 diam	20–27.5 × 9–12.5	Present study, Brazil
bredemeyerae (Rehm) Arx	170–280	4–5.5	–	55–70 × 18–27	18–25 × 8–10	Müller & Arx (1962), Brazil
burchelliae (Doidge) Doidge	90–120	3–4	5–5.5 wide	27–37.5 × 16–20	13–17.5 × 5–6.5	Doidge (1942), South Africa
campograndensis Firmino & Dianese	75–160	5–7	9–14 × 7.5–12	30–40 × 20–32.5	22.5–30 × 9.5–10.5	Present study, Brazil
couepiae (Henn.) G. Arnaud	150–200	6–8	–	30–35 × 26–32	16–24 × 8–13	Arnaud (1918), Brazil
crustacea (Ellis & Everh.) Hansf.	< 400	4.5–5.5	4.5–5.5 wide	100 × 20–25	25–28 × 8–14	Hansford (1955), Dominican Republic
cryptocaryae (Cooke) Hansf.	< 300	4–5	–	100 × 35	25–32 × 11–13	Hansford (1954b), Australia
gibbosa (Gaillard) Hansf	< 90	5–6	10–14 × 7–8	27–32 × 18–24	17–21 × 8–9	Hansford (1949), Brazil
hiiranensis (W. Yamam.) W. Yamam.	35–62	3–4.5	7–11 × 5.5–7	23–30 × 16–23	14–16 × 6.5–7	Yamamoto (1957), Taiwan
hydnocarpi Hosag. & T.K. Abraham	< 264	11–13.5	14–16 × 11–13.5	< 67 diam	49–51.5 × 26–32.5	Hosagoudar & Abraham (1997), India
inaequalis (Mont.) Toro	180–280	6–9	9–14 wide	100 diam	32–40 × 18–25	Toro (1933), French Guiana
licaniae (Cooke) Hansf.	< 450 × 300	6–9	7–13 × 9–13	–	30–33 × 18–20	Hansford (1949), Brazil
licaniicola Hansf.	170	4–5	9–11 × 6–7	–	24–28 × 12–15	Hansford (1949), Brazil
malpighii Bat. & H. Maia	120–185	4–8	13.5–21 × 4–8	37–43 × 27–32	29–35 × 15–16.5	Batista & Maia (1960a), Brazil
mangiferae Hansf. & Thirum.	250–300	7	12–15 × 10–11	< 70 diam	35–42 × 16–19	Hansford & Thirumalachar (1948), India
megathyria (Doidge) Doidge	140–200	5–6	7.5–10 wide	27–40 × 15–20	16–20 × 8–9	Doidge (1942), South Africa
myocoproides (Sacc. & Berl.) Arx	500	8.5–9	16–20 wide	50–60 × 20–22	26–28 × 10–12	Müller & Arx (1962), Brazil
nodulifera (Syd. & P. Syd.) T.A. Hofmann	320–420	4.5–7	9–13 × 8–12	33–36 × 13–15	33–36 × 13–16	Hofmann & Piepenbring (2014), Philippines
nodulosa (Speg.) Hansf.	< 250	5–6	10–15 × 10–12	100 × 50	30–40 × 14–18	Hansford (1949), Costa Rica
nothopegiae Hosag. & T.K. Abraham	< 265	5–7	10–12 × 9.5–11	32–35 × 24–27	19–21 × 9–10	Hosagoudar & Abraham (1997), India
parinaricola Firmino, Inácio et al.	150–207.5	4.5–5.5	10–15 × 7–9	37.5–47.5 × 29–32.5	34–40 × 10–14	Present study, Brazil
parinarii (Syd.) Hansf.	130–160	3–4.5	6.5–7.5 × 5–6	30–38 × 25–35	18–22.5 × 5–6	Hansford (1947), Democratic Republic of the Congo
peruviana Hansf.	200	4–6	4–6 wide	–	17 × 8	Hansford (1955), Peru
pogonophorae Bat. & H. Maia.	125–175	4–6	10–12 × 6–8	43–55 × 33–35	33–35 × 10–12	Batista et al. (1961), Brazil
randiae (Doidge) Arx	75–100	2–4	20 × 5–8	–	15–18 × 5–6.5	Müller & Arx (1962), Southern Africa
santiriae (Syd. & P. Syd.) Hansf.	400 × 250–300	5–7	15–20 × 8–10	50–75 × 45–60	32–36 × 17–22	Hansford (1954a), Philippines
schroeteri (Rehm) Arx	220–300	6–8	10–13 wide	60–70 × 42–46	38–42 × 11–13	Müller & Arx (1962), Brazil
spatholobi Hansf.	250	5–6	6–8 × 6–8	45 × 35	18–20 × 7.5–8.5	Hansford (1954a), Java
sporoboli E. Castell. & Graniti	60–110	6	6–16 × 7–10	–	16–22 × 7–9	Castellani & Graniti (1950), Ethiopia
thaxteri Hansf.	250	3–5	6–7 × 4–7	–	50–55 × 21–24	Hansford (1957), Grenada
ulei Hansf.	200	6–7	8–12 × 9–11	–	24–30 × 12–17	Hansford (1949), Brazil
vateriae Hosag.	300–400 × 150–250	11–13	10–15 × 2–14	< 35 diam	36–39 × 21–23	Hosagoudar et al. (2006), India

Table 2.

Summary of the main characteristics of Asterolibertia species indicating respective host family, host species, and morphology of colonies, appressoria, paraphyses, asci, and ascospores.

Species	Host	Families	Colonies	Appressoria	Pseudoparaphyses	Asci	Ascospores
anisopterae	Anisoptera thurifera	Dipterocarpaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	absent	globose	constricted in the upper third, verruculose
bahiensis sp.nov.	Erythroxylum sp.	Erythroxylaceae	amphigenous	protuberance towards one side	branched	globose to ovoid	constricted in the upper third, verruculose
bakeri	Calamus sp.	Arecaceae	epiphyllous	barrel-shaped to subglobose	absent	ovoid	constricted in the upper third, verruculose
barrinhensis sp. nov.	Diospyrus burchellii	Ebenaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	unbranched	globose to ovoid	constricted in the upper third, verruculose
bredemeyerae	Bredemeyera lucida	Polygalaceae	amphigenous	subglobose	unbranched	ovoid to clavate-cylindrical	constricted at the central septum, smooth
	Sweetia nitens	Fabaceae
burchelliae	Bertiera racemosa	Rubiaceae	epiphyllous	barrel-shaped to cylindrical	absent	ellipsoid-ovoid	constricted in the upper third, smooth
	Burchellia bubalina
	Cremaspora triflora
	Tarenna pavettoides
campograndensis sp.nov.	Hirtella glandulosa	Chrysobalanaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	unbranched	globose to ovoid	constricted in the upper third, smooth
couepiae	Couepia grandiflora	Chrysobalanaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	absent	globose to subglobose	constricted in the upper third, smooth
crustacea	Psidium guajava	Myrtaceae	epiphyllous	cylindrical	absent	clavate to cylindrical	constricted in the upper third, smooth
cryptocaryae	Cryptocarya grandis	Lauraceae	amphigenous	–	absent	ellipsoid	constricted in the upper third, smooth
gibbosa	Basanacantha spinosa	Rubiaceae	amphigenous	barrel-shaped to cylindrical	absent	ovoid to globose	constricted in the upper third, smooth
hiiranensis	Styrax hayataianus	Styracaceae	epiphyllous	–	absent	obovoid to subglobose	constricted at the central septum, smooth
	Styrax suberifolius
hydnocarpi	Hydnocarpus macrocarpa	Achariaceae	epiphyllous	globose to ovoid	–	globose	constricted in the upper third, smooth
inaequalis	Melastomataceae member	Melastomataceae	epiphyllous	barrel-shaped to subglobose	absent	subglobose	constricted in the upper third, verruculose
licaniae	Licania sp.	Chrysobalanaceae	epiphyllous	barrel-shaped	absent	globose	constricted at the central septum, smooth
licaniicola	Licania sp.	Chrysobalanaceae	epiphyllous	barrel-shaped	absent	–	constricted at the central septum, smooth
malpighii	Malpighiaceae member	Malpighiaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	absent	ellipsoid to subglobose	constricted at the central septum, verruculose
mangiferae	Mangifera indica	Anacardiaceae	epiphyllous	barrel-shaped	absent	globose	constricted in the upper third, smooth
megathyria	Tricalysia capensi	Rubiaceae	amphigenous	barrel-shaped	–	ovoid to clavate-cylindrical	constricted in the upper third, smooth
	T. lanceolata and T. sonderiana
myocoproides	Guzmania plumieri	Bromeliaceae	amphigenous	–	branched	ovoid to cyllindrical	constricted at the central septum, verruculose
nodulifera	Angelesia splendens	Chrysobalanaceae	amphigenous	protuberance towards one side	absent	globose to ovoid	constricted in the upper third, verruculose
nodulosa	Guatteria dolichopoda	Annonaceae	epiphyllous	barrel-shaped to subglobose	absent	ovoid to ellipsoid	constricted at the central septum, verruculose
nothopegiae	Nothopegia aureofulva	Anacardiaceae	epiphyllous	globose	–	ovoid	constricted at the central septum, smooth
parinaricola sp. nov.	Parinari obtusifolia	Chrysobalanaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	branched	globose to ovoid	constricted in the upper third, verruculose
parinarii	Parinari subcordata	Chrysobalanaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	unbranched	ellipsoid to subglobose	constricted in the upper third, smooth
peruviana	Bignoniaceae member	Bignoniaceae	epiphyllous	cylindrical	–	–	constricted in the upper third, smooth
	Licania macrophylla	Chrysobalanaceae
pogonophorae	Pogonophora schomburgkiana	Euphorbiaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	absent	oblong to subglobose	constricted in the upper third, smooth
randiae	Randia dumetorum, Keetia gueinziiand Canthium capensis	Rubiaceae	amphigenous	protuberance towards one side	–	ovoid to subclavate	constricted in the upper third, smooth
santiriae	Santiria sp.	Burseraceae	amphigenous	globose	absent	ovoid to ellipsoid	constricted in the upper third, smooth
schroeteri	Annona sp.	Annonaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	absent	ovoid to ellipsoid	constricted in the upper third, smooth
	Chrysobalanus icaco	Chrysobalanaceae
spatholobi	Spatholobus ferrugineus	Fabaceae	epiphyllous	barrel-shaped to cylindrical	absent	ovoid to globose	constricted in the upper third, smooth
sporoboli	Sporobolus ruspolianus	Poaceae	epiphyllous	globose to ellipsoid	–	–	constricted in the upper third, verruculose
thaxteri	unknown plant	-	hypophyllous	–	–	–	constricted in the upper third
ulei	Malpighiaceae member	Malpighiaceae	epiphyllous	subglobose	absent	ovoid to globose	constricted in the upper third, verruculose
vateriae	Vateria indica	Dipterocarpaceae	amphigenous	oblong to ovoid	–	ovoid to globose	constricted at the central septum, smooth

Table 3.

Morphometric characteristics of Cirsosia species (μm), including a new one described in this study.

Cirsosia Species	Ascomata	Hyphae	Appressoria	Asci	Ascospores	Source and country
arecacearum Hosag. & M. Pillai	200–500 × 230–257	3–5	9–9.5 × 8–9.5	43–59 × 24–28	27–31 × 12–14	Hosagoudar & Pillai (1994), India
dipterocarpi (Henn.) Bat. & H. Maia	315–388 × 242–267	5–7	8–10 × 13.5–15	64–70 × 54–60	30–43 × 18–19	Batista & Maia (1960b), Philippines
flabellariae (Syd.) Bat. & H. Maia	240–300 × 141–178	3–5.5	8–16 × 6.5–8	27–29.5 × 19–24	24–27 × 14–16	Batista & Maia (1960b), Sierra Leone
globulifera (Pat.) Arx	240–350 × 150–200	3–6.5	9–12.5 × 7–9.5	60–74.5 × 31–46.5	43–46.5 × 15–18.5	Müller & Arx (1962), Vietnam
hopeae Hosag., Jac. Thomas & D.K. Agarwal	300–470 × 250–300	9–12	9–15 wide	35–44 diam	22–25 × 11–13	Hosagoudar et al. (2011), India
hughesii Bat. & H. Maia	1090–1750 × 300–365	2.5–5.6	8–10.5 × 6.5–10.5	51–62 × 40.5–43	32.5–38 × 13.5–16.5	Batista & Maia (1960b), Ghana
irregularis (Syd.) Arx	500–1100 × 190–280	6–8	–	60–80 × 50–65	32–38 × 15–18	Müller & Arx (1962), Philippines
litseae Hosag. & G.R. Archana	156–392 × 78–196	3–5	11–22 × 3–7	32–40 × 35–40	17–26 × 11–15	Hosagoudar (2012), India
manaosensis (Henn.) G. Arnaud	200–450 × 130–160	4–7	9–13 wide	30–40 diam	25–30 × 12–15	Arnaud (1918), Brazil
moquileae Bat. & H. Maia	150–375	3.5–5	10–12.5 × 6–7.5	25–45 × 22.5–40	20–25 × 14–20	Batista & Maia (1960b), Brazil
moulmeinensis Thaung	< 600 × 340	3.5–5.5	7.5–18.5 × 5.5–12	44.5–57.5 × 37–48	26–33.5 × 15–20.5	Thaung (1976), Myanmar
santiriae Bat. & H. Maia	542–752 × 303–364	5.5–6.5	8–10.5 × 3–5.5	75–85 × 56.5–57.5	32.5–35 × 19–21.5	Batista & Maia (1960b), Philippines
splendida Bat. & H. Maia	330–510 × 160–250	2.5–5	8.5–15 × 4–7.5	20–31 × 17.5–28	17.5–21.5 × 6–7.5	Batista & Maia (1960b), Brazil
splendida var. laevigata Firmino & Dianese n. var.	110–290 × 60–90	2.5–5	10–15 × 4.5–7.5	25–37.5 × 17.5–27.5	17.5–27.5 × 6–9.5	Present study, Brazil
transversalis (Syd.) Deighton	300–900 × 180–280	4–5	11–14 × 7–8	60–80 × 50–70	40–46 × 16–20	Hughes (1952), Philippines
vateriae Hosag.	245–345 × 90–245	7–9	14–18 × 9–11	35–50 diam	28–32 × 15–18	Hosagoudar (2012), India

Table 4.

Summary of the main characteristics of Cirsosia species indicating respective host family and species, and morphology of colonies, appressoria, paraphyses, asci, and ascospores.

Species	Host	Families	Colonies	Appressoria	Pseudoparaphyses	Asci	Ascospore
arecacearum	Calamus thwaitesii	Arecaceae	epiphyllous	globose	–	ovoid	constricted at the central septum, smooth
dipterocarpi	Dipterocarpus grandiflorus	Dipterocarpaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	branched	globose to subglobose	constricted at the central septum, verruculose
flabellariae	Flabellaria pedunculata	Malpighiaceae	epiphyllous	barrel-shaped	unbranched	subglobose to ovoid	constricted at the central septum, verruculose
globulifera	Calamus sp.	Arecaceae	epiphyllous	globose	–	globoso to ovoid	constricted at the central septum, smooth
hopeae	Hopea ponga	Dipterocarpaceae	epiphyllous	globose to barrel-shaped	–	globose	constricted at the central septum, verruculose
hughesii	Ancistrophyllum sp.	Arecaceae	epiphyllous	globose	unbranched	subglobose to ovoid	constricted in the upper third, smooth
irregularis	Vatica obtusifolia	Dipterocarpaceae	hypophyllous	–	absent	globose to ovoid	constricted at the central septum, verruculose
litseae	Litsea travancorica	Lauraceae	hypophyllous	barrel-shaped	–	globose to ovoid	constricted at the central septum, smooth
manaosensis	Malpighiaceae member	Malpighiaceae	epiphyllous	globose to barrel-shaped	present	ovoid	constricted at the central septum, verruculose
moquileae	Licania tomentosa	Chrysobalanaceae	amphigenous	protuberance towards one side	branched	subglobose	constricted in the upper third, smooth
moulmeinensis	Dipterocarpus sp.	Dipterocarpaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	absent	globose to ovoid	constricted in the upper third, smooth
santiriae	Santiria nitida	Burseraceae	amphigenous	globose to barrel-shaped	branched	subglobose to ellipsoid	constricted at the central septum, smooth
splendida	Hirtella americana	Chrysobalanaceae	hypophyllous	globose	unbranched	subglobose	constricted in the upper third, verruculose
splendida var. laevigata	Hirtella glandulosa	Chrysobalanaceae	hypophyllous	protuberance towards one side	branched	globose to subclavate	constricted in the upper third, smooth
transversalis	Arecaceae member	Arecaceae	epiphyllous	protuberance towards one side	branched	subglobose to ellipsoid	constricted at the central septum, verruculose
vateriae	Vateria indica	Dipterocarpaceae	amphigenous	globose	–	globose	constricted at the central septum, smooth

Asterolibertia couepiae, the type species of the genus, was collected in the Brazilian Cerrado by Ule in 1892, while C. manaosensis, the type species of Cirsosia, also from Brazil, was collected also by Ule in the Amazonian forest (Arnaud 1918). Asterolibertia species are characterized by having circular thyriothecial ascomata opening by a central star-shape fissure, adhering to the host by superficial hyphae with intercalary appressoria, and showing 2-celled ascospores. Cirsosia species differ from Asterolibertia in the lirelliform or V–Y-shaped ascomata, opening by a longitudinal fissure. However, as in Asterolibertia, Cirsosia species have superficial hyphae with intercalary appressoria and 2-celled ascospores (Bezerra 2004, Hosagoudar 2010, 2012). The specimens studied here were collected from different areas of the Brazilian Cerrado (including a fragment of Cerrado vegetation inserted in an area of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest in the State of Bahia) and yielded what is here recognised as novel taxa and host-associations for Asterolibertia and Cirsosia.

This paper describes four new Asterolibertia species, a new variety of C. splendida, and illustrates A. licaniae in association with a new host.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Leaves bearing black colonies were collected and dried in a plant press before being processed and deposited in the Fungarium known as the UB Mycological Collection, a part of Herbarium UB (Universidade de Brasília). Colonies were initially examined using a Zeiss Discovery v.8 stereomicroscope. Entire colonies were removed from the leaves by applying small drops of nail polish. After these had solidified and fungal structures became embedded preventing the collapse of the colonies, these were peeled from the leaf surfaces. These colonies and small samples taken directly from the leaves were mounted on slides containing lacto-glycerol for light microscopic observations. Imaging and measurements were done using a Leica DM 2500 light microscope adapted with a DFC 490 Leica digital camera, operated by a Leica Qwin Plus digital image-processing software. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), air-dried material was fixed to disks using carbon double-sided tape, and then treated with gold using a 25-mA current, at 1.10–2 mbar for 2 min and 30 s. Photographs were obtained using a JEOL Model JSM-700 1 F SEM.

RESULTS

A total of 35 species of Asterolibertia have previously been described on 19 different host families (Hosagoudar 2010, Farr & Rossman 2015). These have been described on the families: Chrysobalanaceae (9 species, including two new species described here), Rubiaceae (4); Anacardiaceae, Annonaceae, Dipterocarpaceae, Fabaceae, and Malpighiaceae (2 on each); and Achariaceae, Arecaceae, Bignoniaceae, Bromeliaceae, Burseraceae, Ebenaceae (described here), Erythroxylaceae (described here), Euphorbiaceae, Lauraceae, Melastomataceae, Myrtaceae, Poaceae, Polygalaceae, and Styracaceae (1 on each; Table 2). Asterolibertia bredemeyerae was reported from two different families (Polygalaceae and Fabaceae), as well as A. schroeteri (Annonaceae and Chrysobalanaceae) and A. peruviana (Bignoniaceae and Chrysobalanaceae). However, A. peruviana apparently belongs to Microthyriaceae due to the well-defined circular ostiole present on the ascomata (Hansford 1955, Wu ). As Asterolibertia species are usually host specific, a reevaluation of the three species that occur in two different host families is recommended.

A total of 15 species and one variety of Cirsosia have been described on six different host families (Hosagoudar 2010, Hofmann & Piepenbring 2014, Farr & Rossman 2015): Dipterocarpaceae (5 species); Arecaceae (4); Chrysobalanaceae (3, including the new variety described here); Malpighiaceae (2); and Burseraceae and Lauraceae (1 on each; Table 4). There is no record of the same Cirsosia species being found on two different host families (Hosagoudar 2010, Farr & Rossman 2015).

TAXONOMY

The data in Tables 1–4 that include the characteristics of the new taxa herein proposed were used to formulate the keys provided for the identification of Asterolibertia and Cirsosia species, thus simplifying the text.

Asterolibertia bahiensis Firmino, Inácio & Dianese, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB813315

(Fig. 1)

Fig. 1. A–H.

Asterolibertia bahiensis (UB-Mycol. Col. 9882 – holotype): A. Colony showing thyriothecial ascomata on superficial mycelium. B. Central star-shape fissure in SEM. C. Intercalary appressoria with lateral protuberance. D. Immature ascus. E. Globose to ovoid mature ascus. F. Immature ascospores. G. Brown, verruculose, cylindrical ascospores. H. Verruculose ascospores in SEM. Bars: A = 100 μm; B = 50 μm, and all others = 10 μm.

Etymology: Refers to the state of Bahia where the fungus was collected.

Diagnosis: Asterolibertia bahiensis is quite close to A. nodulifera but differs in having smaller paraphysate ascomata and larger appressoria.

Type: Brazil: Bahia: Una, Bolandeira Farm, on an enclosure of Cerrado vegetation in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, close to the entrance to Comandatuba Island, 15° 21’ 12.7” S 39° 00’ 7.7” W, on leaves of Erythroxylum sp. (Erythroxylaceae), 26 Aug. 1995, M. Sanchez (UB-Mycol Col. 9882 – holotype).

Description: Colonies amphigenous, circular to irregular, single to confluent, black, 1–12 mm diam. Hyphae straight to flexuous, branching irregularly, pale brown, septate, hyphal cells cylindrical, 4–5 μm diam, smooth. Appressoria numerous, entire, sessile, intercalary, elongated with a lateral protuberance, unicellular, 14–17.5 × 9–10 μm, brown, penetration peg central on the appressorial cell. Ascomata superficial, thyriothecia, scutiform, on top of mycelial mat, circular, single to confluent, fringed at margins, randomly distributed in the colony, 175–235 μm diam, opening by a central star-shaped fissure, dark brown; wall of textura radiata, cells cylindrical. Pseudoparaphyses cylindrical, septate, branched, hyaline, to 1 μm wide. Asci bitunicate in structure, fissitunicate, disposed as an upright palisade layer, globose to ovoid, 8-spored, hyaline, 35–52.5 × 30–42.5 μm. Ascospores cylindrical, ends rounded, straight or slightly arched, 1-septate, constricted at the septum at the supramedian septum, hyaline, becoming brown at maturity, verruculose, 32.5–37.5 × 10–14 μm. Asexual morph not seen.

Other specimens examined: On leaves of Erythroxylum sp. (Erythroxylaceae). Brazil: Minas Gerais: Buritis, Pedra Grande Farm, 8 May 1993, J. C. Dianese 863 (UB-Mycol Col. 3934). Bahia: Una, on an enclosure of Cerrado vegetation in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest at Fazenda Bolandeira, near entrance to Comandatuba Island, J.C. Dianese (UB-Mycol Col. 9871).

Notes: The type material was collected in a rare small enclosure of Cerrado vegetation in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. However another specimen (UB – Mycol Col. 3934) was found in a typical Cerrado natural landscape in Buritis, Minas Gerais. In addition, this is the first Asterolibertia species found on a member of Erythroxylaceae (Hosagoudar 2010, Farr & Rossman 2015).

Asterolibertia barrinhensis Firmino & Dianese, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB813316

(Fig. 2)

Fig. 2. A–H.

Asterolibertia barrinhensis (UB-Mycol. Col. 5890 – holotype): A. Colony showing thyriothecial ascomata on superficial mycelium. B. Ascomata showing central star-shape fissure in SEM. C. Superficial mycelium showing intercalary appressoria. D. Intercalary appressoria with lateral protuberance. E. Globose to ovoid mature ascus. F. Immature ascospores. G. Brown smooth cylindrical to oblong-clavate ascospores. H. Smooth ascospores in SEM. Bars: A = 100 μm; B = 50 μm, and all others = 10 μm.

Etymology: Epithet refers to the type locality in Brazil, Barrinha.

Diagnosis: Asterolibertia barrinhensis is quite close to A. campograndensis but differs in having opposite hyphal branching, loose ascomatal fringes and verruculose ascospores.

Type: Brazil: Minas Gerais: Divinópolis, Barrinha Farm, right side of Highway from Divinopólis to Formiga, 20° 13’ 54.9” S 45° 05’ 33.7” W, on leaves of Diospyros burchellii (Ebenaceae), 16 Feb. 1994, J. C. Dianese (UB-Mycol Col. 5890 – holotype).

Description: Colonies epiphyllous, circular to irregular, single to confluent, black, 1–8 mm diam. Hyphae straight to flexuous, with opposite branches, ferruginous to brown, septate, hyphal cells cylindrical, 4–5 μm diam, smooth. Appressoria numerous, entire, intercalary, elongated with a lateral protuberance, unicellular, 9–15 × 7.5–10 μm, ferruginous to brown, penetration peg central on the appressorial cell. Ascomata superficial, thyriothecia, scutiform, on top of mycelial mat, circular, single to confluent, fringed at the margins, randomly distributed in the colony, 105–167.5 μm diam, opening by a central star-shaped fissure, brown; wall of textura radiata, cells isodiametric to cylindrical. Pseudoparaphyses cylindrical, septate, unbranched, hyaline, to 2.5 μm wide. Asci bitunicate in structure, fissitunicate, forming as an upright palisade layer, globose to ovoid, 8-spored, hyaline, 30–42.5 μm diam. Ascospores cylindrical, oblong-clavate, ends broadly rounded, straight, 1-septate, slightly constricted at supramedian septum, hyaline, becoming brown at maturity, verruculose, 20–27.5 × 9–12.5 μm. Asexual morph not seen.

Other specimens examined: On leaves of Diospyros burchellii (Ebenaceae). Brazil: Minas Gerais: Divinópolis, Barrinha, 16 Feb. 1994, J. C. Dianese (UB-Mycol Col. 5891, and 5901); Goiás: Mineiros, Parque Nacional das Emas, Água Ruim, 18° 8’ 12.04” S 52° 58’ 44.06” W, 7 Apr. 1997, J. C. Dianese (UB-Mycol Col. 13844).

Notes: This new Asterolibertia species is the first reported on a member of Ebenaceae (Hosagoudar 2010, Farr & Rossman 2015). It shows characteristics in common with several species (Tables 1–2), including the one described below, but clear differences persist as shown in the discussion that follows the description of A. campograndensis.

Asterolibertia campograndensis Firmino & Dianese, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB813317

(Fig. 3)

Fig. 3. A–H.

Asterolibertia campograndensis (UB-Mycol. Col. 12712a – holotype): A. Colony showing thyriothecial ascomata on superficial mycelium. B. Ascomata showing central star-shape fissure in SEM. C. Superficial mycelium with intercalary appressoria. D. Intercalary appressoria with lateral protuberance E. Immature ascus. F. Globose to ovoid mature ascus. G. Light brown immature ascospores. H. Brown, smooth, oblong-clavate ascospores, constricted at septum on its upper third. Bars: A = 100 μm; B, C = 50 μm, and all others = 10 μm.

Etymology: Epithet refers to the city where the fungus was collected, Campo Grande.

Diagnosis: Asterolibertia campograndensis differs from A. parinarii in having larger hyphae, appressoria and ascospores, and globose to ovoid asci.

Type: Brazil: Mato Grosso do Sul: Campo Grande, left lane of BR-163 Highway, 200 m from the roundabout turn to São Paulo, behind Cerealista Juliana, 20° 35’ 8.58” S 54° 34’ 49.51” W, on leaves of Hirtella glandulosa (Chrysobalanaceae), 22 Aug. 1996, M. Sanchez (UB-Mycol Col. 12712a – holotype).

Description: Colonies epiphyllous, circular to irregular, single to confluent, black, 1–6 mm diam. Hyphae straight to flexuous, mostly showing opposite seldom irregular branches, ferruginous to brown, septate, hyphal cells cylindrical, 5–7 μm diam, smooth. Appressoria numerous, entire, intercalary, elongated with a lateral protuberance, unicellular, 9–14 × 7.5–12 μm, ferruginous to brown, penetration peg central on the appressorial cells. Ascomata superficial, thyriothecia, scutiform, on top of mycelial mat, circular, single to confluent, fringed at margins, massed in the centre of the colony, 75–160 μm diam, opening by a central star-shaped fissure, dark brown; wall of textura radiata to irregulata, cells cylindrical to irregular. Pseudoparaphyses cylindrical, septate, unbranched, hyaline, to 1 μm wide. Asci bitunicate in structure, fissitunicate, disposed as an upright palisade layer, globose to ovoid, 8-spored, hyaline, 30–40 × 20–32.5 μm. Ascospores oblong-clavate, rounded ends, straight, 1-septate, septum supramedian, constricted at septum, hyaline, becoming brown at maturity, smooth, 22.5–30 × 9.5–10.5 μm. Asexual morph not seen.

Notes: Seven species of Asterolibertia have been reported previously in association with living leaves of chrysobalanaceous hosts. Four of these were recorded from Brazil: A. couepiae on Couepia grandiflora, A. licaniae and A. licaniicola on Licania sp., and A. peruviana on Licania macrophylla. Additionally, A. nodulifera was recorded on Angelesia splendens from the Philippines, A. parinarii on Parinari subcordata from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and A. schroeteri on Chrysobalanus icaco from India (Arnaud 1918, Hansford 1947, 1949, 1955, Müller & von Arx 1962, Hosagoudar 2010, Hofmann & Piepenbring 2014, Farr & Rossman 2015).

Asterolibertia campograndensis differs from the species previously reported on Chrysobalanaceae (Table 1) (Arnaud 1918, Hansford 1947, 1949, 1955, Müller & von Arx 1962, Hosagoudar 2010, Hofmann & Piepenbring 2014, Farr & Rossman 2015). It is closest to A. parinarii, which has smaller appressoria and ascospores, narrower hyphae, and ellipsoid to subglobose asci. Asterolibertia couepiae is distinct from the new species in having black hyphae, larger thyriothecial ascomata, lacking pseudoparaphyses, 4–6-spored asci, and ovoid ascospores. Asterolibertia nodulifera has amphigenous colonies, no pseudoparaphyses, larger ascomata and larger, echinulate ascospores. Asterolibertia licaniae differs from A. campograndensis in the dark brown hyphae, barrel-shaped and larger appressoria, ascomatal dehiscence by an irregular fissure, a lack of fringes at the margins of the ascomata, the absence of pseudoparaphyses, and finally larger, ellipsoidal, dark brown ascospores with a central septum. Asterolibertia licaniicola differs from A. campograndensis in the wider hyphae, barrel-shaped appressoria, larger ascomata, absence of pseudoparaphyses, and dark brown ascospores with a central septum. Asterolibertia peruviana has narrower appressoria, larger ascomata that are not fringed at the margins, and smaller appressoria and ascospores. Asterolibertia schroeteri differs in the larger ascomata with an irregular fissure, the absence of pseudoparaphyses, and larger asci and ascospores (Tables 1–2) (Arnaud 1918, Hansford 1947, 1949, 1955, Müller & von Arx 1962, Hofmann & Piepenbring 2014).

Asterolibertia campograndensis is morphologically rather similar to A. barrinhensis. However, these species differ in important morphological details such as ascospore ornamentation, the shape of the ascomatal fringes (loosely set in A. barrinhensis), and hyphal branching patterns (opposite in A. barrinhesis, and irregular in A. campograndensis).

Asterolibertia campograndensis is the fifth species of Asterolibertia reported on hosts belonging to Chrysobalanaceae in Brazil, and the first on Hirtella.

Asterolibertia parinaricola Firmino, Inácio & Dianese, sp. nov.

MycoBank MB813319

(Fig. 4)

Fig. 4. A–H.

Asterolibertia parinaricola (UB-Mycol. Col. 2567 – holotype): A. Colony showing thyriothecial ascomata on superficial mycelium. B. Ascomata showing central star-shape fissure in SEM. C. Superficial mycelium with intercalary appressoria. D. Intercalary elliptic appressoria showing a lateral protuberance. E. Globose to ovoid immature ascus. F. Mature ascus. G. Pale brown to brown, ascospores, constricted at septum on its upper third. H. Verrucolose ascospores on SEM. Bars: A, B = 100 μm; C = 50 μm, and all others = 10 μm.

Etymology: Refers to the host genus, Parinari.

Diagnosis: Asterolibertia parinaricola differs from A. licaniicola in having conspicuous lateral protuberance of the appressoria, presence of pseudoparaphyses, and much larger, verruculose ascospores constricted at a supramedian septum.

Type: Brazil: Distrito Federal: Brasília, PAD-DF, on leaves of Parinari obtusifolia (Chrysobalanaceae), 10 Nov. 1992, C. Furlanetto (UB-Mycol Col. 2567 – holotype).

Description: Colonies epiphyllous, circular or irregular, single or confluent, black, 3–10 mm diam. Hyphae straight, with opposite branches, brown, septate, hyphal cells cylindrical, 4.5–5.5 μm diam, smooth. Appressoria numerous, entire, intercalary, elliptical or with a lateral protuberance, unicellular, 10–15 × 7–9 μm, brown, penetration peg central on the appressorial cells. Ascomata superficial, thyriothecia, scutiform, on top of a mycelial mat, circular, single to confluent, fringed at the margins, randomly distributed in the colony, 150–207 μm diam, opening by a central star-shaped fissure, dark brown; wall textura radiata, with isodiametrical cells. Pseudoparaphyses cylindrical, septate, branched, hyaline, 1–1.5 μm wide. Asci bitunicate in structure, fissitunicate, disposed as an upright palisade layer, globose to ovoid, 8-spored, hyaline, 37.5–47.5 × 29–32.5 μm. Ascospores oblong to oblong-clavate, ends rounded, straight to slightly arched, 1-septate, constricted at the supramedian septum, hyaline, becoming pale brown to brown at maturity, verruculose, 34–40 × 10–14 μm. Asexual morph not seen.

Other specimens examined: On leaves of Parinari obtusifolia (Chrysobalanaceae). Brazil: Maranhão: Nogueiras, 60 km North of Balsas, 6° 57’ 52.47” S 46° 10’ 13.19” W, 11 Apr. 1995, M. A. de Freitas (UB-Mycol Col. 8020). Distrito Federal: Brasília, PAD-DF, 04 Nov. 1993, C. Furlanetto (UB-Mycol Col. 2568 and 2569).

Notes: Seven species of Asterolibertia have been reported previously in association with living leaves of chrysobalanaceous hosts. Asterolibertia couepiae on Couepia grandiflora from Brazil, A. nodulifera on Angelesia splendens from the Philippines, A. licaniae and A. licaniicola on Licania sp. from Brazil, A. parinarii on Parinari subcordata from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, A. peruviana on Licania macrophylla from Brazil, and A. schroeteri on Chrysobalanus icaco from India (Arnaud 1918, Hansford 1947, 1949, 1955, Müller & von Arx 1962, Hosagoudar 2010, Hofmann & Piepenbring 2014, Farr & Rossman 2015).

Asterolibertia parinaricola differs from the species previously reported on Chrysobalanaceae (Table 1) (Arnaud 1918, Hansford 1947, 1949, 1955, Müller & von Arx 1962, Hosagoudar 2010, Hofmann & Piepenbring 2014, Farr & Rossman 2015), and is most similar to A. licaniicola. However, the latter has barrel-shaped appressoria, no pseudoparaphyses, and much smaller, smooth ascospores constricted at the central septum. Asterolibertia couepiae differs from the new species in the wider hyphae, lack of pseudoparaphyses, smaller asci and ascospores, and smooth ascospores. Asterolibertia nodulifera differs in the amphigenous colonies, smaller thyrothecia, lack of pseudoparaphyses, and echinulate ascospores. Additionally, A. licaniae differs from the new species in the larger thyriothecia and wider hyphae, barrel-shaped appressoria, the lack of pseudoparaphyses, and smaller, ellipsoidal, smooth ascospores that are constricted at the central septum. Asterolibertia parinarii has narrower hyphae, unbranched pseudoparaphyses, smaller appressoria, asci and ascospores, and also smooth ascospores. Asterolibertia parinaricola and A. parinarii are described on the same host genus, but on different Parinari species. Besides, there is no record of the host species of A. parinarii in Brazil, further supporting that they are really distinct species (Sothers ). Asterolibertia peruviana has narrower appressoria without a lateral protuberance to one side of the hypha, and smaller, smooth ascospores. Finally, A. schroeteri differs from A. parinaricola in the larger thyriothecia, asci and hyphae, the lack of pseudoparaphyses, and smooth ascospores (Tables 1–2) (Arnaud 1918, Hansford 1947, 1949, 1955, Müller & von Arx 1962, Hofmann & Piepenbring 2014). Asterolibertia campograndensis, newly described above, differs in the unbranched pseudoparaphyses and smaller, smooth ascospores.

Asterolibertia parinaricola is distinct from all seven species known on Chrysobalanaceae, and represents the sixth species of Asterolibertia reported on this host family in Brazil. This is the second species of Asterolibertia described on Parinari, and the first species found on P. obtusifolia.

Asterolibertia licaniae (Cooke) Hansf., Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 160: 140 (1949).

MycoBank MB284420

(Fig. 5)

Fig. 5. A–H.

Asterolibertia licaniae (UB-Mycol. Col. 9715): A. Colony showing thyriothecial ascomata on superficial mycelium. B. Ascomata showing central to irregular fissure in SEM. C. Superficial mycelium with intercalary appressoria. D. Intercalary, elliptical appressoria. E–F. Globose immature asci. G. Immature ascospores. H. Brown to ferruginous smooth ascospores constricted at middle septum. Bars: A, B = 100 μm; C = 50 μm, and all others = 10 μm.

Basionym: Asterina licaniae Cooke, Grevillea 12: 85 (1884).

Specimen examined: Brazil: Rondônia: RO-494 Highway, 82 km from Pimenta Bueno towards Parecis, 11° 45’ 16.43” S 61° 18’ 54.45” W, on leaves of Hirtella gracilipes (Chrysobalanaceae), 13 Jul. 1995, M. Sanchez (UB-Mycol Col. 9715).

Description: Colonies epiphyllous, circular to irregular, single to confluent, dark brown to black, 3–5 mm diam. Hyphae straight or flexuous, branching irregularly, pale brown to brown, septate, hyphal cells cylindrical, 5–8 μm diam, smooth. Appressoria numerous, entire, intercalary, elliptical, unicellular, 9–15 × 7.5–10 μm, pale brown, penetration peg central on the appressorial cell. Ascomata, superficial, thyriothecial, scutiform, radiate, arising on top of a mycelial mat, circular, single to confluent, fringed at the margins, randomly distributed in the colony, 180–410 μm diam, opening by a central star-shaped fissure, dark brown; wall textura radiata, cells cylindrical. Pseudoparaphyses cylindrical, septate, branched, hyaline, 1–1.5 μm wide. Asci bitunicate in structure, fissitunicate, disposed as an upright palisade layer, globose, 8-spored, hyaline, 57.5–65 μm diam. Ascospores oblong, ends rounded, straight, 1-septate, constricted at the median septum, hyaline, becoming brown to ferruginous at maturity, smooth, 30–35 × 19–22.5 μm. Asexual morph not seen.

Notes: The specimen described above was collected in the state of Rondônia on living leaves of Hirtella gracilipes, a new host for A. licaniae. This species was originally described by Hansford (1949) based on material from Brazil collected on leaves of Licania sp.

Key to the known Asterolibertia species

See Tables 1–2 for further information on the characters of the species keyed out here.

1 Colonies amphigenous or epiphyllous ............................................................................................................................ 2

Colonies hypophyllous .................................................................................................................................... A. thaxteri

2 (1) Ascospores smooth ........................................................................................................................................................ 3

Ascospores verruculose ............................................................................................................................................... 24

3 (2) Ascospores medianly constricted ................................................................................................................................... 4

Ascospores constricted supramedianly ........................................................................................................................... 9

4 (3) Ascomata with fringed margin ......................................................................................................................................... 5

Ascomata with uniform margin ......................................................................................................................... A. licaniae

5 (4) Ascomata opening by a stellar fissure ............................................................................................................................ 6

Ascomata opening by an irregular fissure ........................................................................................................ A. vateriae

6 (5) Colonies epiphyllous ....................................................................................................................................................... 7

Colonies amphigenous ......................................................................................................................... A. bredemeyerae

7 (6) Ascospores more than 16 μm in length .......................................................................................................................... 8

Ascospores 14–16 × 6.5–7 μm ................................................................................................................... A. hiiranensis

8 (7) Ascospores 19–21 × 9–10 μm ................................................................................................................ A. nothopegiae

Ascospores 24–28 × 12–15 μm .................................................................................................................. A. licaniicola

9 (3) Colonies amphigenous ................................................................................................................................................. 10

Colonies epiphyllous ..................................................................................................................................................... 14

10 (9) Ascomata with a fringed margin ..................................................................................................................................... 11

Ascomata with a uniform margin ................................................................................................................................... 12

11 (10) Ascospores 15–18 × 5–6.5 μm ........................................................................................................................ A. randiae

Ascospores 32–36 × 17–22 μm ..................................................................................................................... A. santiriae

12 (10) Ascomata over 90 μm diam ......................................................................................................................................... 13

Ascomata to 90 μm diam ................................................................................................................................ A. gibbosa

13 (12) Ascospores 16–20 × 8–9 μm ..................................................................................................................... A. megathyria

Ascospores 25–32 × 11–13 μm ............................................................................................................. A. cryptocaryae

14 (9) Ascomata opening by stellar or irregular fissure ............................................................................................................ 15

Ascomata opening by ostiole [may belong in Mycrothyriaceae] .................................................................. A. peruviana

15 (14) Pseudoparaphyses present .......................................................................................................................................... 16

Pseudoparaphyses absent ........................................................................................................................................... 17

16 (15) Ascospores 22.5–30 × 9.5–10.5 μm ............................................................................................... A. campograndensis

Ascospores 18–22.5 × 5–6 μm ........................................................................................................................ A. parinarii

17 (15) Ascomata with a fringed margin .................................................................................................................................... 18

Ascomata with a uniform margin ................................................................................................................ A. hydnocarpi

18 (17) No leaf discoloration under the colonies ........................................................................................................................ 19

Conspicuous leaf discoloration under the colonies ....................................................................................... A. crustacea

19 (18) Ascomata opening by a stellar fissure ........................................................................................................................... 20

Ascomata opening by an irregular fissure .................................................................................................... A. schroeteri

20 (19) Appressoria showing a lateral protuberance .................................................................................................................. 21

Appressoria barrel-shaped to cylindrical ....................................................................................................................... 22

21 (20) Ascospores 16–24 × 8–13 μm ....................................................................................................................... A. couepiae

Ascospores 33–35 × 10–12 μm ............................................................................................................ A. pogonophorae

22 (20) Ascospores less than 30 μm in length ........................................................................................................................... 23

Ascospores 35–42 × 16–19 μm .................................................................................................................. A. mangiferae

23 (22) Ascospores 13–17.5 × 5–6.5 μm ................................................................................................................ A. burchelliae

Ascospores 18–20 × 7.5–8.5 μm ................................................................................................................. A. spatholobi

24 (2) Ascomata with a fringed margin .................................................................................................................................... 25

Ascomata with a uniform margin ................................................................................................................... A. sporoboli

25 (24) Ascospores medianly constricted ................................................................................................................................. 26

Ascospores constricted supramedianly ......................................................................................................................... 28

26 (25) Pseudoparaphyses absent ........................................................................................................................................... 27

Pseudoparaphyses present .................................................................................................................. A. myocoproides

27 (26) Appressoria with a lateral protuberance ........................................................................................................ A. malpighii

Appressoria barrel-shape to subglobose without a lateral protuberance ....................................................... A. nodulosa

28 (25) Colonies epiphyllous ..................................................................................................................................................... 29

Colonies amphigenous ................................................................................................................................................. 34

29 (28) Pseudoparaphyses present .......................................................................................................................................... 30

Pseudoparaphyses absent ........................................................................................................................................... 31

30 (29) Pseudoparaphyses branched ................................................................................................................... A. parinaricola

Pseudoparaphyses unbranched .............................................................................................................. A. barrinhensis

31 (29) Appressoria showing a lateral protuberance .............................................................................................. A. anisopterae

Appressoria barrel-shaped to subglobose without a lateral protuberance ..................................................................... 32

32 (31) Hyphae 3–5 μm wide ......................................................................................................................................... A. bakeri

Hyphae more than 5 μm wide ....................................................................................................................................... 33

33 (32) Ascospores 24–30 × 12–17 μm ............................................................................................................................... A. ulei

Ascospores 32–40 × 18–25 μm ................................................................................................................... A. inaequalis

34 (28) Pseudoparaphyses present .......................................................................................................................... A. bahiensis

Pseudoparaphyses absent .......................................................................................................................... A. nodulifera

Cirsosia splendida var. laevigata Firmino & Dianese, var. nov.

MycoBank MB813320

(Figs 6–7)

Fig. 6. A–H.

Cirsosia splendida var. laevigata, sexual morph (UB-Mycol. Col. 12712b): A. Colony showing opened lirelliform ascomata on superficial mycelium. B–C. Ascomata opened by a longitudinal fissure seen in SEM and light microscopy, respectively. D. Intercalary elliptic appressoria showing a lateral protuberance. E–F. Globose to subclavate asci. G. Immature ascospores. H. Brown to ferruginous, smooth, cylindrical to subclavate ascospores, showing slight constriction at septum. Bars: A = 100 μm; B = 50 μm; C = 20 μm; G, H = 5 μm, and all others = 10 μm.

Fig. 7. A–H.

Cirsosia splendida var. laevigata, asexual morph (UB-Mycol. Col. 12712b): A. Colony showing opened pycnothyrial condidiomata on superficial mycelium. B–C. Ostiolate pycnothyrium. D. Surface mycelium with intercalary appressoria. E. Intercalary appressorium showing lateral protuberance. F. Immature conidia. G. Brown to ferruginous, smooth, ellipsoidal germinating conidia. H. Smooth-walled conidium seen in SEM. Bars: A, B = 50 μm; D = 20 μm; E = 5 μm, and all others =10 μm.

Etymology: Refers to the smooth ascospores.

Diagnosis: Cirsosia splendida var. laevigata differs from C. splendida var. splendida in having smaller ascomata, pseudoparaphyses, and the smooth ascospores.

Type: Brazil: Mato Grosso do Sul: Campo Grande, BR-163 Highway left lane, 200 m from the roundabout turn to São Paulo, behind Cerealista Juliana, 20° 35’ 8.58” S 54° 34’ 49.51” W, on leaves of Hirtella glandulosa (Chrysobalanaceae), 22 Aug. 1996, M. Sanchez (UB-Mycol Col. 12712b – holotype).

Description: Sexual morph: Colonies hypophyllous, circular or irregular, single or confluent, black, 1–9 mm diam. Hyphae straight or flexuous, with opposite branches, rarely unilateral or irregular, brown, septate, hyphal cells cylindrical, 2.5–5 μm wide, smooth. Appressoria numerous, entire, intercalary, elongated with a lateral protuberance, unicellular, 10–15 × 4.5–7.5 μm, brown, penetration peg central or at the distal part of the appressorial cell. Ascomata superficial, hysterothecia, lirelliform, V–Y-shaped, on top of a mycelia mat, single to confluent, fringed at margins, randomly distributed in the colony, 110–290 × 60–90 μm, opening by longitudinal fissures, brown; wall of textura radiata, cells isodiametric to cylindrical. Pseudoparaphyses cylindrical, septate, branched, hyaline, to 1 μm wide. Asci bitunicate in structure, fissitunicate, disposed as an upright palisade layer, globose to subclavate, 8-spored, hyaline, 25–37.5 × 17.5–27.5 μm. Ascospores cylindrical to oblong-clavate, ends rounded, straight, 1-septate, slightly constricted at the supramedian septum, hyaline, becoming brown to ferruginous at maturity, smooth, 17.5–27.5 × 6–9.5 μm. Asexual morph: Colonies amphigenous, circular or irregular, single or confluent, black, 1–8 mm diam. Hyphae straight or flexuous, branching irregularly, septate, hyphal cells cylindrical, 2.5–3 μm wide, smooth. Appressoria numerous, entire, intercalary, elongated with a lateral protuberance, unicellular, 10–15 × 5–7.5 μm, brown, penetration peg central on the appressorial cell. Conidiomata superficial, pycnothyrial, scutiform, on top of a mycelium mat, circular, single to confluent, fringed at margins, randomly distributed in the colony, 80–120 μm diam, centrally ostiolate, light to dark brown; wall textura radiata, cells isodiametric to cylindrical. Hymenium lining the inner side of upper wall of the conidioma. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, single, hyaline. Conidia initially 1–celled becoming 2–celled at maturity, ellipsoidal, upper cell with rounded end and lower cell with a truncate base, ends rounded when mature, straight, medianly or supramedianly 1-septate, not constricted at the septum, hyaline, becoming brown to ferruginous at maturity, smooth, 20–25 × 4.5–5 μm.

Other specimen examined: Brazil: Rondônia: RO494 Highway, 82 km from Pimenta Bueno towards Parecis, on leaves of Hirtella gracilipes (Chrysobalanaceae), 13 Jul. 1995, M. Sanchez (UB-Mycol Col. 23245).

Notes: Two species of Cirsosia have been reported previously in association with living leaves of chrysobalanaceous hosts: C. moquileae on Licania tomentosa from Brazil, and C. splendida on Hirtella americana, Chrysobalanus icaco, and H. triandra from Brazil, Panama, and Puerto Rico, respectively (Batista & Maia 1960b, Hosagoudar 2010, Hofmann & Piepenbring 2014, Farr & Rossman 2015).

Cirsosia splendida var. laevigata, the first Asterinaceae reported on H. glandulosa and H. gracilipes, is almost identical to C. splendida, except for the smaller ascomata, presence of pseudoparaphyses, and smooth ascospores (Batista & Maia 1960b, Hofmann & Piepenbring 2014). Such differences are here considered enough to recognize the specimen studied as a new variety of C. splendida. Furthermore, both occur on the same host genus in Brazil, but on different species.

Finally, Cirsosia moquileae differs from the new variety by dehiscence through a central star-shaped fissure (instead of the longitudinal fissure normally shown in Cirsosia species), and narrower ascospores (Batista & Maia 1960b). Indeed, such a form of dehiscence and the shape of the ascomata in C. moquileae indicate that that species could be better accommodated in Asterolibertia (Batista & Maia 1960b).

Key to the known Cirsosia species

See Tables 3–4 for further information on the characters of the species keyed out here.

1 Ascospores smooth ........................................................................................................................................................ 2

Ascospores verruculose ................................................................................................................................................ 10

2 (1) Ascospores medianly constricted ................................................................................................................................... 3

Ascospores supramedianly constricted ........................................................................................................................... 7

3 (2) Colonies amphigenous ................................................................................................................................................... 4

Colonies hypophyllous or epiphyllous .............................................................................................................................. 5

4 (3) Ascospores 28–32 × 15–18 μm ....................................................................................................................... C. vateriae

Ascospores 32.5–35 × 19–21.5 μm ................................................................................................................ C. santiriae

5 (3) Colonies epiphyllous ....................................................................................................................................................... 6

Colonies hypophyllous ....................................................................................................................................... C. litseae

6 (5) Asci 4-spored .......................................................................................................................................... C. arecacearum

Asci 8-spored ............................................................................................................................................. C. globulifera

7 (2) Ascomata opening by a longitudinal fissure ..................................................................................................................... 8

Ascomata opening by a stellar fissure ......................................................................................................... C. moquileae

8 (7) Appressoria having a lateral protuberance ...................................................................................................................... 9

Appressoria globose ...................................................................................................................................... C. hughesii

9 (8) Ascospores 17.5–27.5 × 6–9.5 μm ........................................................................................ C. splendida var. laevigata

Ascospores 26–33.5 × 15–20.5 μm ..................................................................................................... C. moulmeinensis

10 (1) Ascospores medianly constricted .................................................................................................................................. 11

Ascospores supramedianly constricted ............................................................................... C. splendida var. splendida

11 (10) Colonies epiphyllous ..................................................................................................................................................... 12

Colonies hypophyllous ................................................................................................................................ C. irregularis

12 (11) Appressoria with a lateral protuberance ........................................................................................................................ 13

Appressoria barrel-shaped to globose ........................................................................................................................... 14

13 (12) Appressoria 8–10 × 13.5–15 μm ............................................................................................................... C. dipterocarpi

Appressoria 11–14 × 7–8 μm ................................................................................................................... C. transversalis

14 (12) Hosts in Malpighiaceae ................................................................................................................................................. 15

Hosts in Dipterocarpaceae ............................................................................................................................... C. hopeae

15 (14) Asci 27–29.5 × 19–24 μm ........................................................................................................................... C. flabellariae

Asci 55–65 × 45–50 μm .......................................................................................................................... C. manaosensis

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We dedicate this publication to the memory of Mariza Sanchez recently deceased, UB Mycol. Col. Curator for over 24 years. We thank CNPq for fellowships, and acknowledge the financial support from PPBIO/CNPq/MCTI- Projeto Fungos do Cerrado.