| Literature DB >> 27433108 |
Cheol Woo Lee1, Ju Ri Lee1, Min Kyu Kim1, Cheorun Jo2, Kyung Haeng Lee3, Insin You4, Samooel Jung1.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of dry aging on the quality of pork loin. Longissimus lumborum muscles were dissected from the right half of five pork carcasses and were used as the control samples. The left halves of the carcasses were aged at 2±1℃ and a relative humidity of 80% for 40 d. The total aerobic bacteria count was similar between the control and dry-aged pork loin (p>0.05). Lactic-acid bacteria was absent in both the control and dry-aged pork loins. Dry-aged pork loin contained low moisture and high protein and ash compared to the controls (p<0.05). The pH was higher and cooking loss was lower in dry-aged pork loin compared to that in the control (p<0.05). Flavor related compounds, such as total free amino acid, hypoxanthine, and inosine of pork loin were higher in dry-aged pork loin; whereas, inosine 5'-monophosphate and guanosine 5'-monophosphate were low in dry-aged pork loin than control (p<0.05). There was no difference in carnosine and anserine content between dry-aged pork loin and the control (p>0.05). Dry-aged pork loin had lower hardness and shear force and received higher core in sensory evaluation than the control (p<0.05). According to the results, dry aging improved textural and sensorial quality of pork loin.Entities:
Keywords: dry aging; pork loin; sensorial quality; tenderness
Year: 2016 PMID: 27433108 PMCID: PMC4942552 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.3.369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Total aerobic and lactic acid bacteria (Log CFU/g) of control and dry-aged pork loin
| Treatment | SEM1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Dry aged | ||
| Total microbial counts | 5.10 | 4.96 | 0.082 |
| Lactic-acid bacteria | ND2 | ND | |
1Standard errors of the least square means (n=10).
2ND: Not detected.
Proximate composition (%) of control and dry-aged pork loin
| Treatment | SEM1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Dry aged | ||
| Moisture | 70.64a | 68.21b | 0.395 |
| Crude fat | 6.12 | 6.33 | 0.378 |
| Crude protein | 22.28b | 23.56a | 0.158 |
| Crude ash | 0.99b | 1.24a | 0.076 |
| pH | 5.54b | 5.66a | 0.012 |
| Cooking loss | 34.34a | 28.16b | 0.219 |
1Standard errors of the least square means (n=10).
a,bValues with different letters within the same column differ significantly (p<0.05).
Free amino acids and histidine dipeptides content (mg/100 g) of control and dry-aged pork loin
| Treatment | SEM1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Dry aged | ||
| Free amino acids | |||
| Ala | 7.14b | 24.10a | 0.537 |
| Arg | 802.84b | 1336.22a | 26.730 |
| Asn | 3.30b | 16.79a | 0.374 |
| GABA | 12.08b | 23.09a | 0.604 |
| Gln | 2.05b | 5.53a | 0.270 |
| His | 3.13b | 13.54a | 0.398 |
| Ile | 4.60b | 18.90a | 0.753 |
| Leu | 12.44b | 44.64a | 0.937 |
| Met | 5.0b | 17.56a | 0.908 |
| Phe | 7.84b | 34.20a | 0.803 |
| Pro | 57.35b | 106.33a | 2.290 |
| Ser | 9.06b | 34.74a | 0.736 |
| Thr | 8.27b | 29.89a | 0.549 |
| Try | 0.15b | 0.66a | 0.122 |
| Tyr | 19.94b | 79.70a | 2.343 |
| Val | 3.98b | 17.37a | 0.374 |
| Cys | 9.54 | 9.83 | 0.494 |
| Gly | 172.51 | 178.40 | 4.710 |
| Asp | 18.10a | 15.05b | 0.472 |
| Lys | 0.20a | 0.01b | 0.023 |
| Total | 1159.55b | 2006.56a | 38.291 |
| Dipeptides | |||
| Anserine | 26.47 | 26.34 | 0.262 |
| Carnosine | 182.40 | 185.83 | 2.053 |
1Standard errors of the least square means (n=10).
a,bValues with different letters within the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Nucleotide and degraded compound content (mg/100 g) of control and dry-aged pork loin
| Treatment | SEM1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Dry-aged | ||
| Guanosine 5'-monophosphate | 4.34a | 2.55b | 0.127 |
| Inosine 5'-monophosphate | 238.92a | 90.69b | 4.313 |
| Hypoxanthine | 8.47b | 27.40a | 0.682 |
| Inosine | 66.24b | 129.82a | 1.599 |
1Standard errors of the least square means (n=10).
a,bValues with different letters within the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Texture properties and shear force of control and dry-aged pork loin
| Treatment | SEM1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Dry-aged | ||
| Hardness (kg) | 35.57a | 27.13b | 0.845 |
| Cohesiveness | 0.51a | 0.48b | 0.152 |
| Springiness | 0.50b | 0.57a | 0.009 |
| Gumminess | 18.34a | 13.22b | 0.487 |
| Chewiness | 9.14a | 7.60b | 0.315 |
| Resilience | 0.19a | 0.15b | 0.003 |
| Shear force (kg) | 4.64a | 2.50b | 0.282 |
1Standard errors of the least square means (n=10).
a,bValues with different letters within the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Sensory properties of control and dry-aged pork loin
| Sensory parameters | Treatment | SEM1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Dry-aged | ||
| Color | 4.78b | 5.19a | 0.096 |
| Taste | 4.19b | 5.36a | 0.152 |
| Flavor | 4.27b | 5.20a | 0.160 |
| Texture | 4.39b | 5.45a | 0.168 |
| Acceptability | 4.22b | 5.44a | 0.157 |
1Standard errors of the least square means (n=64).
a,bValues with different letters within the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).