| Literature DB >> 27433103 |
Supaluk Sorapukdee1, Chanpen Uesakulrungrueng1, Komkhae Pilasombut1.
Abstract
This study was carried out to develop jerky product utilizing spent hen meat. Manipulation of water activity (aw) of semi-dried meat with the addition of humectants (glycerol and sorbitol at the concentration of 0, 10, and 15%) and roasting process were applied to enhance quality of jerky product. After spent hen meat was ground, formulated, reformed and then dried in convection oven at 85℃ for 2 h followed by 60℃ for 1 h, all jerky samples showed values of aw ≤0.85 with total aerobic bacteria, yeast and mold and Staphylococcus aureus counts were reduced to undetectable levels. Moreover, the results showed that the 15% glycerol added jerky showed superior quality, indicated by the lowest aw, low protein aggregation as evaluated by sorption isotherm and the lowest shear value as compared to sorbitol added and control samples (p<0.05). Regardless effect of humectant, roasting could improve the quality of the jerky via enhanced sensory attributes by increasing color, appearance, flavor and overall acceptability scores (p<0.05). Therefore, spent hen meat could be used as a potential raw material for jerky in which soft product texture obtained by the addition of glycerol and intense flavor resulted from roasting process after drying, leading to sensory acceptance.Entities:
Keywords: glycerol; intermediate moisture meat; sorbitol; sorption isotherm; spen hen
Year: 2016 PMID: 27433103 PMCID: PMC4942547 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.3.326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Changes in aw during drying and physicochemical characteristics and sensory attributes of jerky processed from spent hen meats from various formulations
| Parameters | Control | 10% Glycerol | 15% Glycerol | 10% Sorbitol | 15% Sorbitol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value of aw during drying | |||||
| - 0 h | 0.991 ± 0.00b,1,2 | 0.993 ± 0.00a | 0.982 ± 0.00d | 0.987 ± 0.00c | 0.990 ± 0.00b |
| - 1 h | 0.973 ± 0.02a | 0.895 ± 0.01b | 0.795 ± 0.01c | 0.934 ± 0.04a | 0.946 ± 0.01a |
| - 2 h | 0.881± 0.03a | 0.791 ± 0.05ab | 0.702 ± 0.10b | 0.811 ± 0.10ab | 0.808 ± 0.03b |
| - 3 h | 0.854 ± 0.03a | 0.748 ± 0.01b | 0.630 ± 0.07c | 0.787 ± 0.01ab | 0.759 ± 0.04b |
| Drying yield (%) | 42.25 ± 0.81b | 45.81 ± 0.91a | 48.05 ± 0.47a | 47.88 ± 0.76a | 48.46 ± 0.85a |
| Moisture (% wet basis) | 36.54 ± 1.58a | 30.24 ± 1.32b | 24.96 ± 2.00c | 27.11 ± 0.59bc | 25.45 ± 2.41c |
| Color | |||||
| - Lightness (CIE L*) | 24.54 ± 0.10b | 26.83 ± 0.91ab | 28.24 ± 2.20a | 27.84 ± 0.38a | 28.18 ± 0.66a |
| - Redness (CIE a*) | 9.37 ± 0.30c | 10.00 ± 0.38c | 11.49 ± 0.22a | 10.35 ± 0.84bc | 11.18 ± 0.01a |
| - Yellowness (CIE b*) | 12.51 ± 0.04c | 13.47 ± 0.81bc | 15.99 ± 0.66a | 14.15 ± 0.90bc | 14.71 ± 0.68ab |
| Texture Profile Analysis | |||||
| - Hardness (N) | 35.34 ± 0.06a | 33.97 ± 2.99b | 29.12 ± 0.49b | 36.00 ± 3.17a | 38.69 ± 4.17a |
| - Cohesiveness (ratio) | 0.68 ± 0.02a | 0.70 ± 0.02a | 0.70 ± 0.01a | 0.62 ± 0.03b | 0.59 ± 0.0 3b |
| - Gumminess (N) | 24.47 ± 1.60a | 23.63 ± 1.93a | 20.38 ± 2.09b | 22.23 ± 2.54a | 23.57 ± 5.38a |
| - Springiness (ratio) | 0.78 ± 0.05b | 0.81 ± 0.02a | 0.81 ± 0.02a | 0.78 ± 0.02b | 0.74 ± 0.01c |
| - Chewiness (N) | 19.51 ± 0.35a | 19.15 ± 1.56a | 16.61 ± 0.91b | 18.78 ± 2.28a | 18.90 ± 5.24a |
| Shear force (N) | 36.69 ± 0.25a | 31.72 ± 0.46bc | 25.39 ± 0.83d | 30.68 ± 0.35c | 34.70 ± 0.50ab |
| Sensory attributes | |||||
| - Color | 4.27 ± 1.14b | 4.53 ± 1.17ab | 5.00 ± 1.16a | 4.67 ± 1.12ab | 4.53 ± 1.17ab |
| - Appearance | 4.17 ± 1.11a | 4.67 ± 1.29a | 4.70 ± 1.20a | 4.63 ± 1.19a | 4.63 ± 1.03a |
| - Texture | 3.70 ± 1.21a | 4.30 ± 1.20a | 4.40 ± 1.23a | 3.83 ± 1.31a | 4.27 ± 1.10a |
| - Flavor | 4.03 ± 1.15b | 4.57 ± 1.13ab | 4.77 ± 1.45a | 4.23 ± 1.34ab | 4.30 ± 1.21 ab |
| - Overall acceptability | 4.13 ± 1.16b | 4.80 ± 1.15a | 4.80 ± 1.06a | 4.43 ± 1.17ab | 4.63 ± 1.00ab |
1Values are given as means±SD (n=3).
2Different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences among treatments (p<0.05).
Microbial counts (Log CFU/g) of spent hen meat and jerky products from different formulations
| Microbiological analysis | Raw meat | Jerky formulation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 10% Glycerol | 15% Glycerol | 10% Sorbitol | 15% Sorbitol | ||
| Total aerobic bacteria | 2.79±0.291 | ND2 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Yeast and mold | 2.56±0.03 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 2.77±0.04 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
1Values are given as means±SD (n=3).
2Counts below the detection level.
Fig. 1.Pictures of jerky products made from spent hen meat as influenced by humectants (A) and heat treatments (B).
Fig. 2.Sorption isotherm of jerky products made from spent hen meat treated with humectants. Bars represent the standard deviation (n=2).
Physico-chemial characteristics and sensory attributes of jerky products processed from spent hen meats from different heat treatments
| Parameters | Drying | Drying and Roasting |
|---|---|---|
| Drying yield (%) | 47.23 ± 0.9a,1,2 | 46.89 ± 0.01a |
| Water activity (aw) | 0.603 ± 0.07a | 0.580 ± 0.03a |
| Moisture (% wet basis) | 22.61 ± 0.68a | 20.71 ± 2.67a |
| Color | ||
| - Lightness (CIE L*) | 26.59 ± 1.63a | 20.19 ± 0.60b |
| - Redness (CIE a*) | 11.76 ± 0.34a | 12.01 ± 0.14a |
| - Yellowness (CIE b*) | 15.32 ± 0.14a | 14.34 ± 0.13a |
| Texture Profile Analysis | ||
| - Hardness (N) | 25.74 ± 0.18b | 30.34 ± 0.12a |
| - Cohesiveness (ratio) | 0.71 ± 0.00a | 0.70 ± 0.01a |
| - Gumminess (N) | 22.03 ± 1.27a | 23.41 ± 0.42a |
| - Springiness (ratio) | 0.81 ± 0.01a | 0.79 ± 0.05a |
| - Chewiness (N) | 15.66 ± 0.93a | 16.39 ± 0.30a |
| Shear force (N) | 25.16 ± 0.35b | 30.69 ± 0.23a |
| Sensory attributes | ||
| - Color | 4.20 ± 0.92b | 5.39 ± 0.85a |
| - Appearance | 4.47 ± 0.95b | 5.12 ± 0.95a |
| - Texture | 4.40 ± 1.08a | 4.10 ± 1.36a |
| - Flavor | 4.43 ± 1.06b | 5.16 ± 1.10a |
| - Overall acceptability | 4.45 ± 0.94b | 5.04 ± 0.94a |
1Values are given as means±SD (n=3).
2Different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences among treatments (p<0.05).