Literature DB >> 27433014

Use of space and its impact on the welfare of laying hens in a commercial free-range system.

A Rodriguez-Aurrekoetxea1, I Estevez2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the factors influencing patterns of space use of commercial free-range laying hens and their relation to welfare indicators. Three free-range laying hen flocks were studied during one production cycle by collecting spatial locations on 150 individually tagged hens per flock. At the end of production, welfare and morphometric measures were collected. The results indicated that use of the outdoor area was lower during midday (P < 0.05), but remained stable across age periods (P > 0.05). Tagged hens were classified according to their use of the outdoor area (heavy, medium, light, or never) per age period. A total of 49.5% were never observed using the outdoor area, which was higher than any other category (P < 0.05). In addition, the early experience of the hens using the outdoor area during the first 16 wk (20 to 36 wk) determined the level of use of the outdoor area at later ages (P < 0.05). Most use of space parameters did not vary according to age period (P > 0.05); only activity center indoors increased (P < 0.05), while mean distance from the hen house tended to increase (P = 0.053). However, birds with a higher frequency of use of the outdoor area had larger home ranges and activity centers (r = 0.956, r = 0.964 P < 0.05, respectively) and showed lower plumage damage (r = -0.337, P < 0.05) and a lower incidence of footpad dermatitis (r = -0.307, P < 0.05). On the contrary, birds showing higher total walked distance indoors showed a higher incidence of footpad dermatitis (r = 0.329, P < 0.01). We conclude that there exist individual differences in the use of the outdoor area, with early experience (20 to 36 weeks) during the production period being the most relevant factor affecting outdoor area use. Birds visiting the outdoor area more frequently also used larger areas. In addition, individual patterns of space use had some relevance on the incidence on foot pad dermatitis and plumage condition.
© 2016 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  free-range; laying hens; use of space; welfare indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27433014     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  11 in total

1.  Individual Ranging Behaviour Patterns in Commercial Free-Range Layers as Observed through RFID Tracking.

Authors:  Hannah Larsen; Greg M Cronin; Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich; Carolynn L Smith; Paul H Hemsworth; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Why Do Hens Pile? Hypothesizing the Causes and Consequences.

Authors:  Helen Gray; Rachel Davies; Ashleigh Bright; Ann Rayner; Lucy Asher
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-12-10

3.  Impacts of Rearing Enrichments on Pullets' and Free-Range Hens' Positive Behaviors across the Flock Cycle.

Authors:  Dana L M Campbell; Sue Belson; Tim R Dyall; Jim M Lea; Caroline Lee
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Commercial Free-Range Laying Hens' Preferences for Shelters with Different Sunlight Filtering Percentages.

Authors:  Md Sohel Rana; Caroline Lee; Jim M Lea; Dana L M Campbell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Virginie Michel; Jutta Berk; Nadya Bozakova; Jerine van der Eijk; Inma Estevez; Teodora Mircheva; Renata Relic; T Bas Rodenburg; Evangelia N Sossidou; Maryse Guinebretière
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 6.  Welfare issues and potential solutions for laying hens in free range and organic production systems: A review based on literature and interviews.

Authors:  Claire Bonnefous; Anne Collin; Laurence A Guilloteau; Vanessa Guesdon; Christine Filliat; Sophie Réhault-Godbert; T Bas Rodenburg; Frank A M Tuyttens; Laura Warin; Sanna Steenfeldt; Lisa Baldinger; Martina Re; Raffaella Ponzio; Anna Zuliani; Pietro Venezia; Minna Väre; Patricia Parrott; Keith Walley; Jarkko K Niemi; Christine Leterrier
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-05

7.  Validation of a behavior observation form for geese reared in agroforestry systems.

Authors:  Alice Cartoni Mancinelli; Simona Mattioli; Laura Menchetti; Alessandro Dal Bosco; Diletta Chiattelli; Elisa Angelucci; Cesare Castellini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Application of open field, tonic immobility, and attention bias tests to hens with different ranging patterns.

Authors:  Dana L M Campbell; Emily J Dickson; Caroline Lee
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Associations between welfare and ranging profile in free-range commercial and heritage meat-purpose chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus).

Authors:  Joanna Marchewka; Patryk Sztandarski; Żaneta Zdanowska-Sąsiadek; Krzysztof Damaziak; Franciszek Wojciechowski; Anja B Riber; Stefan Gunnarsson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Gastrointestinal Tract Morphometrics and Content of Commercial and Indigenous Chicken Breeds with Differing Ranging Profiles.

Authors:  Joanna Marchewka; Patryk Sztandarski; Żaneta Zdanowska-Sąsiadek; Dobrochna Adamek-Urbańska; Krzysztof Damaziak; Franciszek Wojciechowski; Anja B Riber; Stefan Gunnarsson
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.