Literature DB >> 27433008

Comparisons of bone properties and keel deformities between strains and housing systems in end-of-lay hens.

P Regmi1, N Nelson2, J P Steibel1, K E Anderson3, D M Karcher4.   

Abstract

Susceptibility of caged layers to osteoporosis and cage layer fatigue has generated interest in newer housing systems that favor increased load-bearing activities. However, high incidences of fractures incurred during lay period have been reported in these newer systems. This study is aimed at determining the housing and strain effects on bone properties: dry weight, percentage ash content, cortical density (CBD), cortical thickness (CBT), and keel bone deformities. Tibia, femur, and keel from Hy-Line Brown (HB), Hy-Line Silver Brown (SB), and Barred Plymouth Rock (BR) hens housed in conventional cages (CC), cage-free (CF), and cage-free with range (outdoor access; R) were studied. At 78 wk, 60 hens from each strain and housing system combination were euthanized and bones were excised for analysis. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) was used to measure CBD and CBT in each bone. Three-dimensional images of keels were generated from software using QCT scans to analyze the deformities. Tibiae CBT was greater (P < 0.01) in BR compared to other two strains. Between housing systems, CBT was greater (P < 0.05) for mid and distal tibia of R and CF compared to CC. Tibiae and femoral cortex were denser (P < 0.05) in BR compared to HB and SB. There was no effect of housing system for femur CBD, but CBD was greater (P < 0.05) for middle and distal tibia of birds housed in R compared to CC. CBD for keel bone was greater (P < 0.05) in CF and R birds compared to CC birds. The housing system did not influence the dry bone weight and ash percentage of tibiae and femur. Each housing system was associated with high prevalence (>90%) of keel deformities and the housing and genotype influenced the type of deformity. These findings indicate that range and cage-free housing may have beneficial impact on tibia and keel bone integrity compared to conventional cages but the improvement may not be sufficient to prevent fractures or deformities of keel.
© 2016 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cage-free; cortical bone; keel bone; laying hens; quantitative computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27433008     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  11 in total

1.  Limited Associations between Keel Bone Damage and Bone Properties Measured with Computer Tomography, Three-Point Bending Test, and Analysis of Minerals in Swiss Laying Hens.

Authors:  Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich; Andreas Pfulg; Ernst K F Fröhlich; Susanna Käppeli; Dominik Guggisberg; Annette Liesegang; Michael H Stoffel
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-08-11

2.  Effects of the housing environment and laying hen strain on tibia and femur bone properties of different laying phases of Hy-Line hens.

Authors:  Milan K Sharma; Dima White; Chongxiao Chen; Woo K Kim; Pratima Adhikari
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Effects of housing systems on keel bone damage and egg quality of laying ‎hens.

Authors:  Anna Dedousi; Mirjana Đukić Stojčić; Evangelia Sossidou
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 1.054

4.  A Reliable Method to Assess Keel Bone Fractures in Laying Hens From Radiographs Using a Tagged Visual Analogue Scale.

Authors:  Christina Rufener; Sarah Baur; Ariane Stratmann; Michael J Toscano
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-07

5.  Pathological characterization of keel bone fractures in laying hens does not support external trauma as the underlying cause.

Authors:  Ida Thøfner; Hans Petter Hougen; Chiara Villa; Niels Lynnerup; Jens Peter Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of 20(S)-Hydroxycholesterol on Multilineage Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Isolated from Compact Bones in Chicken.

Authors:  Roshan Adhikari; Chongxiao Chen; Woo Kyun Kim
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 7.  Explanations for keel bone fractures in laying hens: are there explanations in addition to elevated egg production?

Authors:  Michael J Toscano; Ian C Dunn; Jens-Peter Christensen; Stefanie Petow; Kathe Kittelsen; Reiner Ulrich
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Strain differences and effects of different stocking densities during rearing on the musculoskeletal development of pullets.

Authors:  D L Fawcett; T M Casey-Trott; L Jensen; L J Caston; T M Widowski
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  A risk assessment of health, production, and resource occupancy for 4 laying hen strains across the lay cycle in a commercial-style aviary system.

Authors:  Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Ida C N Thøfner; Jan Dahl; Jens Peter Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.