Floris Dammeijer1, Lysanne A Lievense1, G D Marijn Veerman1, Henk C Hoogsteden1, Joost P Hegmans1, Lidia R Arends1, Joachim G Aerts2. 1. Floris Dammeijer, Lysanne A. Lievense, G.D. Marijn Veerman, Henk C. Hoogsteden, Joost P. Hegmans, Joachim G. Aerts, and Lidia R. Arends, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and Joachim G. Aerts, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. 2. Floris Dammeijer, Lysanne A. Lievense, G.D. Marijn Veerman, Henk C. Hoogsteden, Joost P. Hegmans, Joachim G. Aerts, and Lidia R. Arends, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and Joachim G. Aerts, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. j.aerts@erasmusmc.nl.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Programmed cell death protein-1- checkpoint blockers have recently been approved as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, only a subgroup of patients responds and shows long-term survival to these therapies. Tumor vaccines and cellular immunotherapies could synergize with checkpoint blockade, but which of these treatments is most efficacious is unknown. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy of tumor vaccination and cellular immunotherapy in NSCLC. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating cellular immunotherapy or vaccines in NSCLC. We used random effects models to analyze overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), expressed as hazard ratios (HRs), and differences in time (months). The effect of immunotherapy type, disease stage, tumor histology, and concurrent chemotherapy was assessed using subgroup analysis and meta-regression. All procedures were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 18 RCTs that matched our selection criteria; these included a total of 6,756 patients. Immunotherapy extended NSCLC survival and PFS, expressed as HR (OS: HR, 0.81, 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.94, P = .01; PFS: HR, 0.83, 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.95, P = .006) and month difference (OS: difference, 5.43 months, 95% CI, 3.20 to 7.65, P < .005; PFS: difference, 3.24 months, 95% CI, 1.61 to 4.88, P < .005). Cellular therapies outperformed tumor vaccines (OS as HR: P = .005, month difference: P < .001; PFS as HR: P = .001, month difference: P = .004). There was a benefit of immunotherapy in low-stage compared with high-stage NSCLC and with concurrent administration of chemotherapy only in one of four outcome measures evaluated (PFS in months: P = .01 and PFS as HR: P = .031, respectively). There was no significant effect of tumor histology on survival or PFS. CONCLUSION: Tumor vaccines and cellular immunotherapies enhanced OS and PFS in NSCLC. Cellular immunotherapy was found to be more effective than tumor vaccination. These findings have implications for future studies investigating combination immunotherapy in NSCLC.
PURPOSE: Programmed cell death protein-1- checkpoint blockers have recently been approved as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, only a subgroup of patients responds and shows long-term survival to these therapies. Tumor vaccines and cellular immunotherapies could synergize with checkpoint blockade, but which of these treatments is most efficacious is unknown. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy of tumor vaccination and cellular immunotherapy in NSCLC. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating cellular immunotherapy or vaccines in NSCLC. We used random effects models to analyze overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), expressed as hazard ratios (HRs), and differences in time (months). The effect of immunotherapy type, disease stage, tumor histology, and concurrent chemotherapy was assessed using subgroup analysis and meta-regression. All procedures were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 18 RCTs that matched our selection criteria; these included a total of 6,756 patients. Immunotherapy extended NSCLC survival and PFS, expressed as HR (OS: HR, 0.81, 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.94, P = .01; PFS: HR, 0.83, 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.95, P = .006) and month difference (OS: difference, 5.43 months, 95% CI, 3.20 to 7.65, P < .005; PFS: difference, 3.24 months, 95% CI, 1.61 to 4.88, P < .005). Cellular therapies outperformed tumor vaccines (OS as HR: P = .005, month difference: P < .001; PFS as HR: P = .001, month difference: P = .004). There was a benefit of immunotherapy in low-stage compared with high-stage NSCLC and with concurrent administration of chemotherapy only in one of four outcome measures evaluated (PFS in months: P = .01 and PFS as HR: P = .031, respectively). There was no significant effect of tumor histology on survival or PFS. CONCLUSION:Tumor vaccines and cellular immunotherapies enhanced OS and PFS in NSCLC. Cellular immunotherapy was found to be more effective than tumor vaccination. These findings have implications for future studies investigating combination immunotherapy in NSCLC.
Authors: Daphne W Dumoulin; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Joachim G J V Aerts; Jordi Remon; Dirk K M De Ruysscher; Lizza E L Hendriks Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2021-06
Authors: Eric R Gamazon; Matthew R Trendowski; Yujia Wen; Claudia Wing; Shannon M Delaney; Won Huh; Shan Wong; Nancy J Cox; M Eileen Dolan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Hannah Reimann; Andrew Nguyen; J Zachary Sanborn; Charles J Vaske; Stephen C Benz; Kayvan Niazi; Shahrooz Rabizadeh; Patricia Spilman; Andreas Mackensen; Matthias Ruebner; Alexander Hein; Matthias W Beckmann; Edith D van der Meijden; Judith Bausenwein; Sascha Kretschmann; Marieke Griffioen; Jeffrey Schlom; James L Gulley; Karin L Lee; Duane H Hamilton; Patrick Soon-Shiong; Peter A Fasching; Anita N Kremer Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 13.751