Literature DB >> 27432869

Performance of Eleven Simplified Methods for the Identification of Elevated Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents.

Chuanwei Ma1, Roya Kelishadi1, Young Mi Hong1, Pascal Bovet1, Anuradha Khadilkar1, Tadeusz Nawarycz1, Małgorzata Krzywińska-Wiewiorowska1, Hajer Aounallah-Skhiri1, Xin'nan Zong1, Mohammad Esmaeil Motlagh1, Hae Soon Kim1, Vaman Khadilkar1, Alicja Krzyżaniak1, Habiba Ben Romdhane1, Ramin Heshmat1, Shashi Chiplonkar1, Barbara Stawińska-Witoszyńska1, Jalila El Ati1, Mostafa Qorbani1, Neha Kajale1, Pierre Traissac1, Lidia Ostrowska-Nawarycz1, Gelayol Ardalan1, Lavanya Parthasarathy1, Min Zhao1, Bo Xi2.   

Abstract

The identification of elevated blood pressure (BP) in children and adolescents relies on complex percentile tables. The present study compares the performance of 11 simplified methods for assessing elevated or high BP in children and adolescents using individual-level data from 7 countries. Data on BP were available for a total of 58 899 children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years from 7 national surveys in China, India, Iran, Korea, Poland, Tunisia, and the United States. Performance of the simplified methods for screening elevated or high BP was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the curve), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. When pooling individual data from the 7 countries, all 11 simplified methods performed well in screening high BP, with high area under the curve values (0.84-0.98), high sensitivity (0.69-1.00), high specificity (0.87-1.00), and high negative predictive values (≥0.98). However, positive predictive value was low for most simplified methods, but reached ≈0.90 for each of the 3 methods, including sex- and age-specific BP references (at the 95th percentile of height), the formula for BP references (at the 95th percentile of height), and the simplified method relying on a child's absolute height. These findings were found independently of sex, age, and geographical location. Similar results were found for simplified methods for screening elevated BP. In conclusion, all 11 simplified methods performed well for identifying high or elevated BP in children and adolescents, but 3 methods performed best and may be most useful for screening purposes.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents; children; epidemiology; high blood pressure; hypertension; methodology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27432869      PMCID: PMC4991624          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  36 in total

1.  Early detection of hypertension in general practice.

Authors:  S Somu; B Sundaram; A N Kamalanathan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Tracking of blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoli Chen; Youfa Wang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  User-friendly tools to identify elevated blood pressure in children.

Authors:  Arnaud Chiolero; Gilles Paradis
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Childhood obesity, other cardiovascular risk factors, and premature death.

Authors:  Paul W Franks; Robert L Hanson; William C Knowler; Maurice L Sievers; Peter H Bennett; Helen C Looker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Update on the 1987 Task Force Report on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Body fat indices for identifying risk of hypertension in Indian children.

Authors:  N A Kajale; A V Khadilkar; S A Chiplonkar; V V Khadilkar
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.411

8.  Combined effects of child and adult elevated blood pressure on subclinical atherosclerosis: the International Childhood Cardiovascular Cohort Consortium.

Authors:  Jonna Juhola; Costan G Magnussen; Gerald S Berenson; Alison Venn; Trudy L Burns; Matthew A Sabin; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Stephen R Daniels; Patricia H Davis; Wei Chen; Mika Kähönen; Leena Taittonen; Elaine Urbina; Jorma S A Viikari; Terence Dwyer; Olli T Raitakari; Markus Juonala
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey.

Authors:  T J Cole; M C Bellizzi; K M Flegal; W H Dietz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

10.  Methodology and Early Findings of the Fourth Survey of Childhood and Adolescence Surveillance and Prevention of Adult Non-Communicable Disease in Iran: The CASPIAN-IV Study.

Authors:  Roya Kelishadi; Gelayol Ardalan; Mostafa Qorbani; Asal Ataie-Jafari; Maryam Bahreynian; Mahnaz Taslimi; Mohammad Esmaeil Motlagh; Ramin Heshmat
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-12
View more
  11 in total

1.  Performance of modified blood pressure-to-height ratio for identifying hypertension in Chinese and American children.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhang; Chuanwei Ma; Lili Yang; Pascal Bovet; Bo Xi
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Performance of the Simplified American Academy of Pediatrics Table to Screen Elevated Blood Pressure in Children.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhang; Liu Yang; Yaping Hou; Min Zhao; Pascal Bovet; Bo Xi
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 3.  Screening children for hypertension: the case against.

Authors:  Nicole Ide; Matthew Thompson
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Blood pressure-to-height ratio as a screening indicator of elevated blood pressure among children and adolescents in Chongqing, China.

Authors:  L Y Wang; Q Liu; X T Cheng; J J Jiang; H Wang
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Can Pediatric Hypertension Criteria Be Simplified? A Prediction Analysis of Subclinical Cardiovascular Outcomes From the Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  Bo Xi; Tao Zhang; Shengxu Li; Emily Harville; Lydia Bazzano; Jiang He; Wei Chen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Validation of recommended definition in identifying elevated blood pressure in adolescents.

Authors:  Hui Fan; Yudan Liu; Xingyu Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Identifying elevated blood pressure and hypertension in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Shengxu Li; Wei Chen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  A simple table based on height to assess elevated and high blood pressure in children.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhang; Liu Yang; Yaping Hou; Min Zhao; Arnaud Chiolero; Pascal Bovet; Bo Xi
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  Traffic-related air pollution is associated with glucose dysregulation, blood pressure, and oxidative stress in children.

Authors:  Jennifer K Mann; Liza Lutzker; Stephanie M Holm; Helene G Margolis; Andreas M Neophytou; Ellen A Eisen; Sadie Costello; Tim Tyner; Nina Holland; Gwen Tindula; Mary Prunicki; Kari Nadeau; Elizabeth M Noth; Fred Lurmann; S Katharine Hammond; John R Balmes
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Height-based equations as screening tools for elevated blood pressure in the SAYCARE study.

Authors:  Estela Skapino; Azahara Iris Rupérez; Sandra Restrepo-Mesa; Keisyanne Araújo-Moura; Augusto César De Moraes; Heráclito Barbosa Carvalho; Juan Carlos Aristizabal; Luis Alberto Moreno
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.