Tom Kai Ming Wang1, David Hm Choi2, Tharumenthiran Ramanathan2, Peter N Ruygrok3. 1. Green Lane Cardiovascular Service, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: TWang@adhb.govt.nz. 2. Green Lane Cardiovascular Service, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. Green Lane Cardiovascular Service, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), there is increasing interest in evaluating outcomes of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with or without (+/-) concurrent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) particularly in high-risk patients. We reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of octogenarians undergoing isolated AVR and AVR+CABG. METHODS: All patients 80 years of age or older undergoing AVR+/-CABG at Auckland City Hospital during 2005-2012 were included, and their characteristics and outcomes analysed. RESULTS: There were 93 and 104 octogenarians respectively undergoing isolated AVR and AVR+CABG with mean follow-up of 4.4+/-2.2 years and 4.1+/-2.3 years. Significant differences in baseline and operative characteristics contributed to higher EuroSCORE II (5.9 vs 6.4%, P=0.016) and STS Score (4.9 vs 6.9%, P<0.001) for AVR+CABG patients. They also had a significantly higher rate of 30-day mortality (0.0% vs 6.7%, P=0.015) and prolonged ventilation>24hours (10.7% vs 23.1%, P<0.001), but not composite morbidity (P=0.248) or stroke (P=0.709). Long-term survival was similar at one, three and five years; 94.6%, 82.6% and 73.0% for AVR and 91.3%, 86.1% and 67.6% for AVR+CABG. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality included reduced creatinine clearance and history of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: AVR+CABG had significantly higher but acceptable 30-day mortality in octogenarians than AVR. We have identified prognostic factors important in the decision-making of treatment modality, where age alone should not preclude surgery.
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), there is increasing interest in evaluating outcomes of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with or without (+/-) concurrent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) particularly in high-risk patients. We reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of octogenarians undergoing isolated AVR and AVR+CABG. METHODS: All patients 80 years of age or older undergoing AVR+/-CABG at Auckland City Hospital during 2005-2012 were included, and their characteristics and outcomes analysed. RESULTS: There were 93 and 104 octogenarians respectively undergoing isolated AVR and AVR+CABG with mean follow-up of 4.4+/-2.2 years and 4.1+/-2.3 years. Significant differences in baseline and operative characteristics contributed to higher EuroSCORE II (5.9 vs 6.4%, P=0.016) and STS Score (4.9 vs 6.9%, P<0.001) for AVR+CABG patients. They also had a significantly higher rate of 30-day mortality (0.0% vs 6.7%, P=0.015) and prolonged ventilation>24hours (10.7% vs 23.1%, P<0.001), but not composite morbidity (P=0.248) or stroke (P=0.709). Long-term survival was similar at one, three and five years; 94.6%, 82.6% and 73.0% for AVR and 91.3%, 86.1% and 67.6% for AVR+CABG. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality included reduced creatinine clearance and history of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: AVR+CABG had significantly higher but acceptable 30-day mortality in octogenarians than AVR. We have identified prognostic factors important in the decision-making of treatment modality, where age alone should not preclude surgery.