Literature DB >> 27432511

Splenectomy Causes 10-Fold Increased Risk of Portal Venous System Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis Patients.

Xingshun Qi1, Guohong Han2, Chun Ye3, Yongguo Zhang1, Junna Dai1, Ying Peng1, Han Deng1, Jing Li1, Feifei Hou1, Zheng Ning1, Jiancheng Zhao1, Xintong Zhang1, Ran Wang1, Xiaozhong Guo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) is a life-threatening complication of liver cirrhosis. We conducted a retrospective study to comprehensively analyze the prevalence and risk factors of PVST in liver cirrhosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS All cirrhotic patients without malignancy admitted between June 2012 and December 2013 were eligible if they underwent contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans. Independent predictors of PVST in liver cirrhosis were calculated in multivariate analyses. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the severity of PVST (any PVST, main portal vein [MPV] thrombosis >50%, and clinically significant PVST) and splenectomy. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. RESULTS Overall, 113 cirrhotic patients were enrolled. The prevalence of PVST was 16.8% (19/113). Splenectomy (any PVST: OR=11.494, 95%CI=2.152-61.395; MPV thrombosis >50%: OR=29.987, 95%CI=3.247-276.949; clinically significant PVST: OR=40.415, 95%CI=3.895-419.295) and higher hemoglobin (any PVST: OR=0.974, 95%CI=0.953-0.996; MPV thrombosis >50%: OR=0.936, 95%CI=0.895-0.980; clinically significant PVST: OR=0.935, 95%CI=0.891-0.982) were the independent predictors of PVST. The prevalence of PVST was 13.3% (14/105) after excluding splenectomy. Higher hemoglobin was the only independent predictor of MPV thrombosis >50% (OR=0.952, 95%CI=0.909-0.997). No independent predictors of any PVST or clinically significant PVST were identified in multivariate analyses. Additionally, PVST patients who underwent splenectomy had a significantly higher proportion of clinically significant PVST but lower MELD score than those who did not undergo splenectomy. In all analyses, the in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between cirrhotic patient with and without PVST. CONCLUSIONS Splenectomy may increase by at least 10-fold the risk of PVST in liver cirrhosis independent of severity of liver dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27432511      PMCID: PMC4962757          DOI: 10.12659/msm.898866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) refers to the formation of a thrombus within the intrahepatic portal vein branches, main portal vein (MPV), splenic vein (SV), and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) [1,2]. Given the relatively high prevalence and negative prognostic impact of PVST in liver cirrhosis [3-6], understanding the risk factors of PVST is important to optimize the prevention strategy in clinical practice. Portal vessel wall injury caused by splenectomy may be one of the most important local risk factors of PVST [7-15]. Numerous studies confirmed that the incidence of PVST after splenectomy was up to about 50% [15]. Notably, splenectomy is widely used for the treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertension and hypersplenism in China [16], but not in the West. However, few studies have explored the extent to which the risk of PVST is increased by splenectomy in liver cirrhosis. On the other hand, factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations are the major systemic risk factors of PVST in liver cirrhosis [17]. Notably, these 2 gene mutations are frequently observed in Western populations [18], but rarely in Chinese populations [19,20]. Taken together, the distribution of risk factors of PVST in liver cirrhosis may be largely different between Western countries and China. Herein, we analyzed the prevalence and risk factors of PVST in a retrospective cohort of Chinese patients with liver cirrhosis based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Additionally, the effect of PVST on the in-hospital mortality of liver cirrhosis was explored.

Material and Methods

Patients

All patients with a diagnosis of liver cirrhosis who were admitted to our hospital between June 2012 and December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed in this study. At our hospital, the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was made according to the history of chronic liver diseases, clinical symptoms (i.e., decompensated events) and signs, laboratory tests (i.e., liver function and coagulation tests), and abdominal images (i.e., liver and spleen morphology). If necessary, liver biopsy was performed. All eligible patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI scans to evaluate the patency of portal venous system vessels. Malignancy was excluded. The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of our hospital, approval number (k2014)07.

Clinical and laboratory data

As previously mentioned, our study group had continuously collected the data of cirrhotic patients from our hospital [21-26]. Some of them had been included in our previous studies. The primary data were as follows: age, sex, etiology of liver cirrhosis, other diseases, previous history of surgery, abdominal trauma, main clinical presentations (i.e., acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding [AUGIB], ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy [HE]), red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC), platelet count (PLT), total bilirubin (TBIL), albumin (ALB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), potassium, sodium, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and international normalized ratio (INR). Notably, the major indications for splenectomy with or without portal azygous devascularization in our patients were splenomegaly and hypersplenism and prevention of portal hypertension-related bleeding. Endoscopic examinations, if any, were reviewed. Severity of esophageal varices at endoscopy was evaluated [16]. Several scores/indexes related to the prognosis of liver diseases were also calculated, including Child-Pugh [27], model for end-stage of liver disease (MELD) [28], AST to PLT ratio index (APRI) [29], AST to ALT ratio (AAR) [30], FIB-4 [31], fibrosis index (FI) [32], and King scores [33].

Imaging data

Extension of portal venous system vessels referred to the left portal vein branch (LPV), right portal vein branch (RPV), MPV, SV, and SMV. Degree of MPV thrombosis was divided into mural (thrombus occupation <50%), partial (thrombus occupation >50%), total (thrombus occupation=100%), and obliterative (MPV became fibrotic cord) [34]. Cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) was also identified. Clinically significant PVST was defined as any 1 of the following conditions: 1) partial MPV thrombosis with SMV thrombosis; or 2) total MPV thrombosis with or without SMV thrombosis [35]. Additionally, the maximal diameters of spleen, SV, and MPV, and ascites were also evaluated.

Data analysis

Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and median (range) and were compared by the independent-sample t test. Categorical data were expressed as frequency (percentage) and were compared by the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Comparative analyses were performed according to the severity of thrombosis (PVST versus no PVST, partial and total MPV thrombosis versus mural MPV thrombosis and patency, and clinically significant PVST versus no clinically significant PVST). Comparative analyses were further performed after excluding patients who underwent splenectomy. All variables that were statistically significant in the univariate analyses were also entered into the multivariate logistic regression analyses. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to express the association of different variables with PVST. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were also compared between PVST patients with and without splenectomy. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software version 16.0.0.

Results

A total of 113 cirrhotic patients were included in our study. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. A majority of patients were male (66.4%) and had Child-Pugh class A and B (79.6%). Major etiologies of liver cirrhosis were hepatitis B virus and alcohol abuse. The prevalence of PVST was 16.8% (19/113). MPV thrombosis was observed in 12.4% (14/113) of patients, including mural (n=5, 4.4%), partial (n=6, 5.3%), and total (n=3, 2.7%) thrombosis. Eight (7.1%) patients had a history of splenectomy. Characteristics of patients without splenectomy are shown in Supplementary Table 1. After excluding splenectomy, the prevalence of PVST was 13.3% (14/105).
Table 1

Characteristics of all patients.

VariablesNValues
Age (years)11355.15±12.87; 55.18 (22.14–85.46)
Sex (Male/Female) – n.11375 (66.4%)/38 (33.6%)
Etiology of liver diseases – n.113
 – Hepatitis B virus alone34 (30.1%)
 – Hepatitis C virus alone7 (6.2%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus4 (3.5%)
 – Alcohol30 (26.5%)
 – Hepatitis B virus + Alcohol9 (8.0%)
 – Hepatitis C virus + Alcohol1 (0.9%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus + Alcohol1 (0.9%)
 – Autoimmunity6 (5.3%)
 – Drug related2 (1.8%)
 – Unknown20 (17.7%)
Disease history – n.113
 – Diabetes15 (13.3%)
 – Coronary heart disease8 (7.1%)
 – Ischemic stroke5 (4.4%)
 – Arterial hypertension9 (8.0%)
 – Deep vein thrombosis1 (0.9%)
Surgery history – n.113
 – Splenectomy8 (7.1%)
 – Appendicectomy3 (2.7%)
 – Gastric surgery2 (1.8%)
 – Colonic surgery1 (0.9%)
 – Orthopedic surgery3 (2.7%)
Abdominal trauma history – n.1131 (0.9%)
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding – n.11319 (16.8%)
Ascites at CT scans – n.113
 – No49 (43.4%)
 – Mild30 (26.5%)
 – Moderate-Severe34 (30.1%)
Hepatic encephalopathy – n.1126 (5.4%)
Esophageal varices at endoscopy – n.48
 – No10 (20.8%)
 – Mild3 (6.2%)
 – Moderate10 (20.8%)
 – Severe25 (52.1%)
Red blood cell (1012/L)1103.39±0.88; 3.36 (1.19–5.27)
Hemoglobin (g/L)110105.15±30.48; 106.00 (42.00–170.00)
White blood cell (109/L)1105.10±3.22; 4.40 (1.50–20.50)
Platelet count (109/L)110101.37±82.67; 75.00 (11.00–545.00)
Total bilirubin (umol/L)11246.79±69.82; 22.50 (5.10–436.50)
Albumin (g/L)11132.27±6.53; 31.70 (11.70–44.30)
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)11251.74±61.61; 33.00 (8.00–429.00)
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)11274.18±95.92; 47.00 (10.00–889.00)
Alakaline phosphatate (U/L)112120.88±86.96; 92.00 (34.00–524.40)
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)112154.86±216.00; 66.00 (12.00–1130.00)
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)1105.70±2.58; 5.09 (1.73–17.18)
Creatinine (umol/L)11058.85±21.00; 55.65 (29.00–151.00)
Potassium (mmol/L)1104.04±0.47; 4.00 (3.01–5.43)
Sodium (mmol/L)110138.07±6.32; 138.80 (83.00–144.50)
Prothrombin time (seconds)11116.21±6.35; 14.70 (11.40–62.80)
Activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds)11144.56±16.09; 42.00 (29.90–180.00)
International normalized ratio1111.34±0.81; 1.16 (0.77–7.96)
Child-Pugh score1087.61±2.02; 7.50 (5.00–12.00)
Child-Pugh class A/B/C10840 (37.0%)/45 (41.7%)/23 (21.3%)
MELD score1085.93±6.95; 4.73 (−5.20–34.52)
APRI score1103.12±5.98; 1.67 (0.10–56.99)
AAR score1121.27±1.66; 0.69 (0.20–10.08)
FIB-4 score1108.94±9.49; 5.85 (0.38–61.59)
FI score109−25.33±6.73; −25.24 (−39.25 – −3.85)
King score109115.74±299.39; 43.31 (1.77–2589.47)
Portal vein system thrombosis – n.11319 (16.8%)
According to the location of thrombosis
 – Left portal vein branch thrombosis – n.1137 (6.2%)
 – Right portal vein branch thrombosis – n.1136 (5.3%)
 – Main portal vein thrombosis – n.11314 (12.4%)
 – Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis – n.1139 (8.0%)
 – Splenic vein thrombosis – n.1134 (3.5%)
According to the degree of MPV thrombosis
 – Mural thrombosis (<50%) – n.1135 (4.4%)
 – Partial thrombosis (>50%) – n.1136 (5.3%)
 – Total thrombosis (100%) – n.1133 (2.7%)
Cavernous transformation of the portal vein – n.1135 (4.4%)
Clinically significant PVST – n.1138 (7.1%)
Maximal diameter of spleen (mm)105140.27±30.77; 138.20 (83.8–240.9)
Maximal diameter of splenic vein (mm)10510.68±3.83; 10.3 (4.3–29.6)
Maximal diameter of main portal vein (mm)11318.38±5.44; 17.90 (0–35.4)
In-hospital mortality – n.1134 (3.5%)

Risk factors in all patients

PVST

Patients with PVST had significantly higher proportions of splenectomy and severe esophageal varices, lower RBC, Hb, ALB, and sodium, and higher FI score than those without (Table 2). Only Hb, but not RBC, was entered into the multivariate analysis, because there was a collinearity between RBC and Hb. The statistical significance was observed as esophageal varices were categorized into 4 grades, but disappeared as it was categorized into 2 grades. Thus, this variable was not entered into the multivariate analysis. Because ALB was 1 component of the FI score, FI score was not entered. Finally, splenectomy (OR=11.494, 95%CI=2.152–61.395, p=0.004) and higher Hb (OR=0.974, 95%CI=0.953–0.996, p=0.019) were the independent predictors of PVST.
Table 2

Overall comparison between patients with and without PVST.

VariablesPVSTNo PVSTP value
NValuesNValues
Age (years)1953.14±12.219455.56±13.020.457
Sex (Male/Female) – n.1913 (68.4%)/6 (31.6%)9462 (66%)/32 (34%)0.836
Etiology of liver diseases – n.19940.916
 – Hepatitis B virus alone5 (26.3%)29 (30.9%)
 – Hepatitis C virus alone1 (5.3%)6 (6.4%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus1 (5.3%)3 (3.2%)
 – Alcohol5 (26.3%)24 (26.6%)
 – Hepatitis B virus + Alcohol3 (15.8%)6 (6.4%)
 – Hepatitis C virus + Alcohol0 (0%)1 (1.1%)
 – Autoimmunity1 (5.3%)5 (5.3%)
 – Drug related0 (0%)2 (2.1%)
 – Unknown3 (15.8%)17 (18.1%)
Disease history – n.1994
 – Diabetes3 (15.8%)12 (12.8%)0.723
 – Coronary heart disease0 (0%)8 (8.5%)0.187
 – Ischemic stroke1 (5.3%)4 (4.3%)0.846
 – Arterial hypertension0 (0%)9 (9.6%)0.160
 – Deep vein thrombosis0 (0%)1 (1.1%)0.652
Surgery history – n.1994
 – Splenectomy5 (26.3%)3 (3.2%)<0.001
 – Appendicectomy0 (0%)3 (3.2%)1.000
 – Gastric surgery0 (0%)2 (2.1%)1.000
 – Colonic surgery0 (0%)1 (1.1%)1.000
 – Orthopedic surgery0 (0%)3 (3.2%)1.000
Abdominal trauma history – n.190 (0%)941 (1.1%)0.652
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding – n.193 (15.8%)9416 (17.0%)0.896
Ascites at CT scans – n.19940.068
 – No5 (26.3%)44 (46.8%)
 – Mild9 (47.4%)21 (22.3%)
 – Moderate-Severe5 (26.3%)29 (30.9%)
Hepatic encephalopathy – n.192 (10.5%)934 (4.3%)0.272
Esophageal varices at endoscopy – n.10380.047
 – No0 (0%)10 (26.3%)
 – Mild2 (20.0%)1 (2.6%)
 – Moderate1 (10.0%)9 (23.7%)
 – Severe7 (70.0%)18 (47.4%)
Red blood cell (1012/L)182.86±0.64923.49±0.880.004
Hemoglobin (g/L)1884.39±26.8992109.21±29.590.001
White blood cell (109/L)185.24±3.07925.08±3.260.844
Platelet count (109/L)18110.33±102.159299.62±78.850.617
Total bilirubin (umol/L)1955.52±97.619345.01±63.230.552
Albumin (g/L)1929.41±6.649232.87±6.390.035
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)1949.84±58.839352.13±62.460.884
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)1963.74±55.919376.31±102.290.605
Alakaline phosphatate (U/L)19132.92±124.2793118.42±77.880.510
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)19132.11±185.4793159.51±222.330.617
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)186.20±3.30925.61±2.420.377
Creatinine (umol/L)1865.06±26.909257.64±19.600.171
Potassium (mmol/L)184.04±0.46924.04±0.460.954
Sodium (mmol/L)18135.03±13.4392138.66±3.500.025
Prothrombin time (seconds)1818.71±11.399315.73±4.770.068
Activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds)1849.36±33.459343.63±9.870.168
International normalized ratio181.68±1.60931.27±0.540.052
Child-Pugh score188.28±1.74907.48±2.060.126
Child-Pugh class A/B/C184 (22.2%)/9 (50.0%)/5 (27.8%)9036 (40%)/36 (40%)/18 (20%)0.356
MELD score187.94±8.70905.53±6.540.181
APRI score182.21±2.07923.29±6.470.487
AAR score191.16±2.20931.30±1.540.740
FIB-4 score187.39±5.04929.25±10.130.451
FI score18−22.19±7.0591−25.96±6.530.029
King score18100.93±218.9091118.67±313.780.820
Maximal diameter of spleen (mm)14153.19±37.9891138.28±29.250.092
Maximal diameter of splenic vein (mm)1411.05±4.449110.63±3.760.703
Maximal diameter of main portal vein (mm)1917.68±6.869418.52±5.130.542
In-hospital mortality – n.191 (5.3%)943 (3.2%)0.656

MPV thrombosis >50%

Patients with MPV thrombosis >50% had a significantly higher proportion of splenectomy and lower RBC and Hb than those without (Table 3). Severity of liver dysfunction was not significantly different between them. Only Hb, but not RBC, was entered into the multivariate analysis, because there was a collinearity between RBC and Hb. Finally, both splenectomy (OR=29.987, 95%CI=3.247–276.949, p=0.003) and higher Hb (OR=0.936, 95%CI=0.895–0.980, p=0.004) were the independent predictors of MPV thrombosis >50%.
Table 3

Overall comparison between patients with and without MPV thrombosis >50%.

VariablesMPV thrombosis >50%MPV thrombosis <50% and MPV patencyP value
NValuesNValues
Age (years)957.68±13.9510454.93±12.820.542
Sex (Male/Female) – n.95 (55.6%)/4 (44.4%)10470 (67.3%)/34 (32.7%)0.474
Etiology of liver diseases – n.91040.740
 – Hepatitis B virus alone2 (22.2%)32 (30.8%)
 – Hepatitis C virus alone0 (0%)7 (6.7%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus1 (1.1%)3 (2.9%)
 – Alcohol2 (22.2%)28 (26.9%)
 – Hepatitis B virus + Alcohol2 (22.2%)7 (6.7%)
 – Hepatitis C virus + Alcohol0 (0%)1 (1.0%)
 – Autoimmunity0 (0%)6 (5.8%)
 – Drug related0 (0%)2 (1.9%)
 – Unknown2 (22.2%)18 (17.3%)
Disease history – n.9104
 – Diabetes2 (22.2%)13 (12.5%)0.410
 – Coronary heart disease0 (0%)8 (7.7%)0.388
 – Ischemic stroke1 (11.1%)4 (4.6%)0.309
 – Arterial hypertension0 (0%)9 (8.7%)0.358
 – Deep vein thrombosis0 (0%)1 (1.0%)0.768
Surgery history – n.9104
 – Splenectomy4 (44.4%)4 (3.8%)<0.001
 – Appendicectomy0 (0%)3 (2.9%)0.606
 – Gastric surgery0 (0%)2 (1.9%)0.675
 – Colonic surgery0 (0%)1 (1.0%)0.768
 – Orthopedic surgery0 (0%)3 (2.9%)0.606
Abdominal trauma history – n.90 (0%)1041 (1.0%)0.768
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding – n.91 (11.1%)10418 (17.3%)0.633
Ascites at CT scans – n.91040.065
 – No1 (11.1%)48 (46.2%)
 – Mild5 (55.6%)25 (24.0%)
 – Moderate-Severe3 (33.3%)31 (29.8%)
Hepatic encephalopathy – n.90 (0%)1036 (5.8%)0.457
Esophageal varices at endoscopy – n.7410.057
 – No0 (0%)10 (24.4%)
 – Mild0 (0%)3 (7.3%)
 – Moderate0 (0%)10 (24.4%)
 – Severe7 (100%)18 (43.9%)
Red blood cell (1012/L)92.70±0.371013.45±0.880.013
Hemoglobin (g/L)970.22±12.85101108.26±29.66<0.001
White blood cell (109/L)94.70±3.171015.14±3.230.698
Platelet count (109/L)9136.33±122.1510198.26±78.330.187
Total bilirubin (umol/L)917.77±15.0210349.33±72.150.195
Albumin (g/L)929.94±7.2110232.48±6.470.266
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)928.33±26.8110353.79±63.420.236
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)939.11±43.2410377.24±98.740.255
Alakaline phosphatate (U/L)974.82±42.70103124.90±88.780.098
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)933.78±23.30103165.44±222.090.079
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)96.43±4.571015.64±2.350.380
Creatinine (umol/L)956.24±15.8410159.08±21.450.699
Potassium (mmol/L)94.01±0.351014.05±0.470.842
Sodium (mmol/L)9138.64±2.85101138.02±6.540.778
Prothrombin time (seconds)915.78±3.0210216.25±6.570.832
Activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds)939.22±7.2210245.03±16.590.302
International normalized ratio91.28±0.331021.34±0.840.824
Child-Pugh score97.67±1.41997.61±2.070.932
Child-Pugh class A/B/C92 (22.2%)/6 (66.7%)/1 (11.1%)9938 (38.4%) 39 (39.4%)/22 (22.2%)0.282
MELD score93.11±5.58996.19±7.030.205
APRI score91.14±0.921013.29±6.210.303
AAR score90.48±0.311031.34±1.710.543
FIB-4 score95.37±3.891019.26±9.780.240
FI score9−23.31±7.63100−25.52±6.660.348
King score934.26±28.62100123.08±311.550.396
Maximal diameter of spleen (mm)5158.50±48.02100139.36±29.730.176
Maximal diameter of splenic vein (mm)511.74±4.0410010.63±3.840.530
Maximal diameter of main portal vein (mm)918.64±8.9810418.36±5.090.881
In-hospital mortality – n.90 (0%)1044 (3.8%)0.549

Clinically significant PVST

Patients with clinically significant PVST had significantly higher proportions of splenectomy and ascites and lower RBC and Hb than those without (Table 4). Only Hb, but not RBC, was entered into the multivariate analysis, because there was a collinearity between RBC and Hb. The statistical significance was observed as ascites were categorized into 3 grades, but disappeared as it was categorized into 2 grades. Thus, this variable was not entered into the multivariate analysis. Finally, both splenectomy (OR=40.415, 95%CI=3.895–419.295, p=0.002) and higher Hb (OR=0.935, 95%CI=0.891–0.982, p=0.007) were the independent predictors of clinically significant PVST.
Table 4

Overall comparison between patients with and without clinically significant PVST.

VariablesClinically significant PVSTNo clinically significant PVSTP value
NValuesNValues
Age (years)858.47±14.6910554.90±12.760.451
Sex (Male/Female) – n.84 (50%)/4 (50%)10571 (67.6%)/34 (32.4%)0.309
Etiology of liver diseases – n.81050.595
 – Hepatitis B virus alone2 (25%)32 (30.5%)
 – Hepatitis C virus alone0 (0%)7 (6.7%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus1 (12.5%)3 (2.9%)
 – Alcohol1 (12.5%)29 (27.6%)
 – Hepatitis B virus + Alcohol2 (25%)7 (6.7%)
 – Hepatitis C virus + Alcohol0 (0%)1 (1.0%)
 – Autoimmunity0 (0%)6 (5.6%)
 – Drug related0 (0%)2 (1.9%)
 – Unknown2 (25%)18 (17.1%)
Disease history – n.8105
 – Diabetes2 (25%)13 (12.4%)0.311
 – Coronary heart disease0 (0%)8 (7.6%)1.000
 – Ischemic stroke1 (12.5%)4 (3.8%)0.312
 – Arterial hypertension0 (0%)9 (8.6%)1.000
 – Deep vein thrombosis0 (0%)1 (1.1%)1.000
Surgery history – n.8105
 – Splenectomy4 (50%)4 (3.8%)<0.001
 – Appendicectomy0 (0%)3 (2.9%)1.000
 – Gastric surgery0 (0%)2 (1.9%)1.000
 – Colonic surgery0 (0%)1 (1.0%)1.000
 – Orthopedic surgery0 (0%)3 (3.2%)1.000
Abdominal trauma history – n.80 (0%)1051 (1.1%)1.000
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding – n.81 (12.5%)10518 (17.1%)1.000
Ascites at CT scans – n.81050.046
 – No1 (12.5%)48 (45.7%)
 – Mild5 (62.5%)25 (23.8%)
 – Moderate-Severe2 (25%)32 (30.5%)
Hepatic encephalopathy – n.80 (0%)1056 (5.8%)1.000
Esophageal varices at endoscopy – n.6420.098
 – No0 (0%)10 (23.8%)
 – Mild0 (0%)3 (7.1%)
 – Moderate0 (0%)10 (23.8%)
 – Severe6 (100%)19 (45.2%)
Red blood cell (1012/L)82.71±0.391023.44±0.880.022
Hemoglobin (g/L)870±13.72102107.90±29.730.001
White blood cell (109/L)85.06±3.1810265.10±3.230.972
Platelet count (109/L)8151.38±121.3510297.45±78.370.076
Total bilirubin (umol/L)818.78±15.7310448.95±71.910.241
Albumin (g/L)828.89±6.9210332.54±6.460.129
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)830.5±27.8110453.38±63.250.314
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)842.25±45.1110476.63±98.450.331
Alakaline phosphatate (U/L)878.18±44.36104124.17±88.670.150
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)834.88±24.65104164.09±221.440.103
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)86.58±4.861025.64±2.340.322
Creatinine (umol/L)856.9±16.8110259.00±21.360.786
Potassium (mmol/L)83.95±0.311024.05±0.470.541
Sodium (mmol/L)8138.45±2.98102138.04±6.510.861
Prothrombin time (seconds)815.9±3.2110316.23±6.540.887
Activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds)838.31±7.1410345.04±16.500.256
International normalized ratio81.29±0.351031.34±0.840.877
Child-Pugh score87.75±1.491007.6±2.060.841
Child-Pugh class A/B/C82 (25.0%)/5 (62.5%)/1 (12.5%)10038 (38%)/40 (40%)/22 (22%)0.460
MELD score83.45±5.861006.13±7.020.296
APRI score81.01±0.891023.28±6.180.302
AAR score80.48±0.331041.33±1.700.160
FIB-4 score84.34±2.571029.30±9.750.156
FI score8−22.40±7.63101−25.57±6.640.202
King score832.03±29.75101122.37±310.060.414
Maximal diameter of spleen (mm)4137.9±15.66101140.36±31.260.876
Maximal diameter of splenic vein (mm)411.68±4.6710110.64±3.820.600
Maximal diameter of main portal vein (mm)819.11±9.4810518.33±5.070.695
In-hospital mortality – n.80 (0%)1054 (3.7%)1.000

Risk factors after excluding splenectomy

After excluding splenectomy, patients with PVST had significantly lower RBC, Hb, ALB, sodium, PT, APTT, INR, MELD score, and FI score, and higher Cr than those without (Table 5). Given the potential collinearity among variables, only Hb and INR, but not RBC or PT, were entered into the multivariate analysis. Additionally, because Cr and INR were 2 components of the MELD score, MELD score was not entered. Similarly, because ALB was 1 component of the FI score, FI score was not entered. Finally, no variables were identified as independent predictors of PVST.
Table 5

Comparison between patients with and without PVST after excluding splenectomy.

VariablesPVSTNo PVSTP value
NValuesNValues
Age (years)1452.67±11.699155.60±13.220.435
Sex (Male/Female) – n.1411 (78.64%)/3 (21.4%)9160 (65.9%)/31 (34.1%)0.347
Etiology of liver diseases – n.14910.988
 – Hepatitis B virus alone5 (35.7%)27 (29.7%)
 – Hepatitis C virus alone1 (7.1%)6 (6.6%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus0 (0%)3 (3.3%)
 – Alcohol5 (35.7%)25 (27.5%)
 – Hepatitis B virus + Alcohol1 (7.1%)6 (6.6%)
 – Hepatitis C virus + Alcohol0 (0%)1 (1.1%)
 – Autoimmunity0 (0%)5 (5.5%)
 – Drug related0 (0%)2 (2.0%)
 – Unknown2 (14.3%)16 (17.6%)
Disease history – n.1491
 – Diabetes2 (14.3%)11 (12.1%)0.816
 – Coronary heart disease0 (0%)8 (8.8%)0.594
 – Ischemic stroke1 (7.1%)4 (4.4%)0.518
 – Arterial hypertension0 (0%)9 (9.9%)0.604
 – Deep vein thrombosis0 (0%)1 (1.1%)1.000
Surgery history – n.1491
 – Splenectomy0 (0%)0 (0%)NA
 – Appendicectomy0 (0%)3 (3.3%)1.000
 – Gastric surgery0 (0%)2 (2.2%)1.000
 – Colonic surgery0 (0%)1 (1.1%)1.000
 – Orthopedic surgery0 (0%)3 (3.3%)1.000
Abdominal trauma history – n.140 (0%)911 (1.1%)1.000
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding – n.142 (14.3%)9115 (16.5%)0.835
Ascites at CT scans – n.14910.219
 – No4 (28.6%)42 (46.2%)
 – Mild6 (42.9%)20 (22.0%)
 – Moderate-Severe4 (28.6%)29 (31.9%)
Hepatic encephalopathy – n.142 (14.3%)904 (4.4%)0.142
Esophageal varices at endoscopy – n.5370.237
 – No0 (0%)10 (27.0%)
 – Mild1 (20%)1 (2.7%)
 – Moderate1 (20%)8 (21.6%)
 – Severe3 (60%)18 (48.6%)
Red blood cell (1012/L)132.92±0.71893.49±0.890.028
Hemoglobin (g/L)1388.69±28.6089108.73±29.840.025
White blood cell (109/L)134.85±3.19894.98±3.230.897
Platelet count (109/L)1358.77±38.488997.97±79.650.085
Total bilirubin (umol/L)1468.26±111.359045.36±63.990.269
Albumin (g/L)1428.65±7.288932.91±6.480.027
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)1446.71±64.269052.37±63.220.757
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)1456.79±49.929076.82±103.560.480
Alakaline phosphatate (U/L)14123.12±94.3790116.82±78.220.786
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)14145.00±202.9890162.02±225.430.791
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)136.97±3.39895.63±2.450.083
Creatinine (umol/L)1371.12±29.628957.71±19.830.036
Potassium (mmol/L)134.05±0.51894.03±0.460.880
Sodium (mmol/L)13133.73±15.6689138.64±3.510.010
Prothrombin time (seconds)1320.25±13.129015.77±4.840.021
Activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds)1354.82±38.259043.73±10.010.023
International normalized ratio131.87±1.86901.28±0.550.016
Child-Pugh score138.62±1.76877.49±2.080.069
Child-Pugh class A/B/C132 (15.4%)/6 (46.2%)/5 (38.5%)8735 (40.2%)/34 (39.1%)/18 (20.7%)0.167
MELD score1310.48±8.57875.60±6.620.019
APRI score132.64±2.22893.37±6.560.694
AAR score141.38±2.54901.32±1.560.903
FIB-4 score139.19±4.71899.45±10.230.928
FI score13−20.73±7.3988−25.99±6.620.010
King score13128.23±254.1688121.70±318.660.944
Maximal diameter of spleen (mm)14153.19±37.9891138.28±29.250.092
Maximal diameter of splenic vein (mm)1411.05±4.449110.63±3.760.703
Maximal diameter of main portal vein (mm)1417.51±7.279118.47±4.820.521
In-hospital mortality – n.141 (7.1%)913 (3.3%)0.441
After excluding splenectomy, patients with MPV thrombosis >50% had significantly lower Hb and higher BUN than those without (Table 6). Severity of liver dysfunction was not significantly different between them. In the multivariate analysis, only Hb (OR=0.952, 95%CI=0.909–0.997, p=0.035) was an independent predictor of MPV thrombosis >50%.
Table 6

Comparison between patients with and without MPV thrombosis >50% after excluding splenectomy.

VariablesMPV thrombosis >50%MPV thrombosis <50% and MPV patencyP value
NValuesNValues
Age (years)561.13±11.7210054.92±13.060.300
Sex (Male/Female) – n.53 (60%)/2 (40%)10068 (68.0%)/32 (32.0%)0.658
Etiology of liver diseases – n.51000.996
 – Hepatitis B virus alone2 (40%)30 (30.0%)
 – Hepatitis C virus alone0 (0%)7 (7.0%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus0 (0%)3 (3.0%)
 – Alcohol2 (40%)28 (28.0%)
 – Hepatitis B virus + Alcohol0 (0%)7 (7.0%)
 – Hepatitis C virus + Alcohol0 (0%)1 (1.0%)
 – Autoimmunity0 (0%)5 (5.0%)
 – Drug related0 (0%)2 (2.0%)
 – Unknown1 (20%)17 (17.0%)
Disease history – n.5100
 – Diabetes1 (20%)12 (12.0%)0.491
 – Coronary heart disease0 (0%)8 (8.0%)1.000
 – Ischemic stroke1 (20%)4 (4.0%)0.220
 – Arterial hypertension0 (0%)9 (9.0%)1.000
 – Deep vein thrombosis0 (0%)1 (1.0%)1.000
Surgery history – n.5100
 – Splenectomy0 (0%)0 (0%)NA
 – Appendicectomy0 (0%)3 (3.0%)1.000
 – Gastric surgery0 (0%)2 (2.0%)1.000
 – Colonic surgery0 (0%)1 (1.0%)1.000
 – Orthopedic surgery0 (0%)3 (3%)1.000
Abdominal trauma history – n.50 (0%)1001 (1.0%)1.000
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding – n.51 (0%)10017 (17.0%)0.589
Ascites at CT scans – n.51000.080
 – No0 (0%)46 (46.0%)
 – Mild3 (60%)23 (23.0%)
 – Moderate-Severe2 (40%)31 (31.0%)
Hepatic encephalopathy – n.50 (0%)996 (6.1%)1.000
Esophageal varices at endoscopy  – n.3380.357
 – No0 (0%)10 (25.6%)
 – Mild0 (0%)2 (5.1%)
 – Moderate0 (0%)8 (23.1%)
 – Severe3 (100%)18 (46.2%)
Red blood cell (1012/L)52.75±0.29973.46±0.890.081
Hemoglobin (g/L)572.40±8.7397107.92±30.000.010
White blood cell (109/L)54.36±4.25974.99±3.170.669
Platelet count (109/L)552.00±32.859795.08±77.750.222
Total bilirubin (umol/L)523.12±18.399949.72±73.350.422
Albumin (g/L)528.40±8.929832.53±6.590.181
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)515.80±6.149953.41±64.120.195
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)521.80±9.509976.77±99.850.223
Alakaline phosphatate (U/L)577.28±60.1999119.71±80.670.250
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)532.00±19.6699166.18±225.310.188
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)58.22±5.30975.68±2.400.033
Creatinine (umol/L)562.94±19.349759.24±21.800.711
Potassium (mmol/L)54.13±0.40974.05±0.470.640
Sodium (mmol/L)5138.84±2.1597137.98±6.650.773
Prothrombin time (seconds)516.24±3.409816.34±6.680.973
Activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds)542.02±8.129845.28±16.860.669
International normalized ratio51.32±0.38981.35±0.860.933
Child-Pugh score58.20±1.30957.61±2.110.538
Child-Pugh class A/B/C50 (0%)/4 (80%)/1 (20%)9537 (38.9%)/36 (37.8%)/22 (23.2%)0.130
MELD score55.43±5.30956.27±7.150.796
APRI score51.28±0.69973.38±6.320.462
AAR score50.48±0.27991.38±1.740.253
FIB-4 score57.68±3.45979.51±9.900.683
FI score5−20.92±8.8796−25.54±6.780.147
King score539.52±21.3896126.87±317.420.542
Maximal diameter of spleen (mm)5158.50±48.02100139.36±29.730.176
Maximal diameter of splenic vein (mm)511.74±4.0410010.63±3.840.530
Maximal diameter of main portal vein (mm)517.86±11.4310018.36±5.090.833
In-hospital mortality – n.50 (0%)1004 (4.0%)1.000
After excluding splenectomy, patients with clinically significant PVST had a significantly higher proportion of ascites, lower Hb, and higher BUN and FI score than those without (Table 7). The statistical significance was observed as ascites were categorized into 3 grades, but disappeared as it was categorized into 2 grades. Thus, this variable was not entered into the multivariate analysis. Because ALB was 1 component of the FI score, FI score was not entered. Finally, no variables were identified as independent predictors of clinically significant PVST.
Table 7

Comparison between patients with and without clinically significant PVST after excluding splenectomy.

VariablesClinically significant PVSTNo clinically significant PVSTP value
NValuesNValues
Age (years)463.59±11.9610154.88±12.990.191
Sex (Male/Female) – n.42 (50%)/2 (50%)10169 (68.3%)/32 (31.7%)0.593
Etiology of liver diseases – n.41010.996
 – Hepatitis B virus alone2 (50%)30 (29.7%)
 – Hepatitis C virus alone0 (0%)7 (6.9%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus0 (0%)3 (3.0%)
 – Alcohol1 (25%)28 (27.7%)
 – Hepatitis B virus + Alcohol0 (0%)7 (6.9%)
 – Hepatitis C virus + Alcohol0 (0%)1 (1.0%)
 – Autoimmunity0 (0%)5 (5.0%)
 – Drug related0 (0%)2 (2.0%)
 – Unknown1 (25%)17 (16.8%)
Disease history – n.4101
 – Diabetes1 (25%)12 (11.9%)0.415
 – Coronary heart disease0 (0%)8 (7.9%)1.000
 – Ischemic stroke1 (25%)4 (4.0%)0.180
 – Arterial hypertension0 (0%)9 (8.9%)1.000
 – Deep vein thrombosis0 (0%)1 (1.0%)1.000
Surgery history – n.4101
 – Splenectomy0 (0%)0 (0%)NA
 – Appendicectomy0 (0%)3 (3.0%)1.000
 – Gastric surgery0 (0%)2 (2.0%)1.000
 – Colonic surgery0 (0%)1 (1.0%)1.000
 – Orthopedic surgery0 (0%)3 (3.0%)1.000
Abdominal trauma history – n.40 (0%)1011 (1.0%)1.000
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding – n.41 (12.5%)10117 (16.8%)1.000
Ascites at CT scans – n.41010.047
 – No0 (0%)46 (45.5%)
 – Mild3 (75%)23 (22.8%)
 – Moderate-Severe1 (25%)32 (31.7%)
Hepatic encephalopathy – n.40 (0%)1016 (6.0%)1.000
Esophageal varices at endoscopy – n.2400.552
 – No0 (0%)10 (25%)
 – Mild0 (0%)2 (5%)
 – Moderate0 (0%)9 (22.5%)
 – Severe2 (100%)19 (47.5%)
Red blood cell (1012/L)42.79±0.32983.45±0.890.145
Hemoglobin (g/L)472.5±10.0898107.55±30.070.023
White blood cell (109/L)45±4.62984.96±3.170.981
Platelet count (109/L)461±29.989894.28±77.770.397
Total bilirubin (umol/L)426.48±19.3810049.32±73.090.536
Albumin (g/L)425.9±8.039932.59±6.580.050
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)417±6.3810052.99±63.940.265
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)423.75±9.7410076.14±99.540.297
Alakaline phosphatate (U/L)484.6±66.88100118.99±80.580.402
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)433.75±22.25100164.77±224.610.248
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)48.96±5.81985.67±2.370.013
Creatinine (umol/L)465.93±20.979859.16±21.700.542
Potassium (mmol/L)44.03±0.38984.04±0.470.969
Sodium (mmol/L)4138.5±2.3298138.00±6.620.881
Prothrombin time (seconds)416.6±3.819916.33±6.650.935
Activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds)440.9±8.929945.30±16.770.605
International normalized ratio41.36±0.43991.35±0.850.983
Child-Pugh score48.5±1.29967.60±2.100.400
Child-Pugh class A/B/C40 (0%)/3 (75%)/1 (25%)9637 (38.5%)/37 (38.5%)/22 (22.9%)0.244
MELD score46.69±5.18966.21±7.130.895
APRI score41.06±0.54983.37±6.290.466
AAR score40.47±0.321001.37±1.730.303
FIB-4 score46.22±1.25989.58±9.860.503
FI score4−18.51±8.1497−25.59±6.770.044
King score436.38±23.3297126.10±315.860.573
Maximal diameter of spleen (mm)4137.9±15.66101140.36±31.260.876
Maximal diameter of splenic vein (mm)411.68±4.6710110.64±3.820.600
Maximal diameter of main portal vein (mm)418.6±13.0610118.33±4.780.919
In-hospital mortality – n.40 (0%)1014 (4.0%)1.000

Comparison of characteristics between PVST patients with and without splenectomy

PVST patients with splenectomy had significantly higher proportions of clinically significant PVST and RPV thrombosis, higher PLT, and lower MELD and FIB-4 scores than those without (Table 8).
Table 8

Comparison between PVST patients with and without splenectomy.

VariablesSplenectomyNo splenectomyP value
NValuesNValues
Age (years)554.46±14.981452.67±11.690.787
Sex (Male/Female) – n.52 (40%)/3 (60%)1411 (78.6%)/3 (21.4%)0.111
Etiology of liver diseases – n.5140.059
 – Hepatitis B virus alone0 (0%)5 (35.7%)
 – Hepatitis C virus alone0 (0%)1 (7.1%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus1 (20%)0 (0%)
 – Alcohol0 (0%)5 (35.7%)
 – Hepatitis B virus + Alcohol2 (40%)1 (7.1%)
 – Hepatitis C virus + Alcohol0 (0%)0 (0%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus + Alcohol0 (0%)0 (0%)
 – Autoimmunity1 (20%)0 (0%)
 – Drug related0 (0%)0 (0%)
 – Unknown1 (20%)2 (14.3%)
Disease history – n.514
 – Diabetes1 (20%)2 (14.3%)0.764
 – Coronary heart disease0 (0%)0 (0%)NA
 – Ischemic stroke0 (0%)1 (7.1%)1.000
 – Arterial hypertension0 (0%)0 (0%)NA
 – Deep vein thrombosis0 (0%)0 (0%)NA
Surgery history – n.514
 – Appendicectomy0 (0%)0 (0%)NA
 – Gastric surgery0 (0%)0 (0%)NA
 – Colonic surgery0 (0%)0 (0%)NA
 – Orthopedic surgery0 (0%)0 (0%)NA
Abdominal trauma history – n.50 (0%)140 (0%)NA
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding – n.51 (20%)142 (14.3%)0.764
Ascites at CT scans – n.5140.805
 – No1 (20%)4 (28.6%)
 – Mild3 (60%)6 (42.9%)
 – Moderate-Severe1 (20%)4 (28.6%)
Hepatic encephalopathy – n.50 (0%)142 (14.3%)0.372
Esophageal varices at endoscopy – n.550.565
 – No0 (0%)0 (0%)
 – Mild1 (20%)1 (20%)
 – Moderate0 (0%)1 (20%)
 – Severe4 (80%)2 (60%)
Red blood cell (1012/L)52.7±0.45132.92±0.710.532
Hemoglobin (g/L)573.2±20.081388.69±28.600.287
White blood cell (109/L)56.24±2.82134.85±3.190.408
Platelet count (109/L)5244.4±93.791358.77±38.48<0.001
Total bilirubin (umol/L)519.84±20.411468.26±111.350.356
Albumin (g/L)531.54±4.271428.65±7.280.419
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)558.6±44.991446.71±64.260.710
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)583.2±72.981456.79±49.920.380
Alakaline phosphatate (U/L)5160.36±198.1614123.12±94.370.580
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)596±136.7114145±202.980.626
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)54.18±2.16136.97±3.390.109
Creatinine (umol/L)549.3±3.461371.12±29.620.126
Potassium (mmol/L)53.99±0.35134.05±0.510.804
Sodium (mmol/L)5138.4±3.4013133.73±15.660.525
Prothrombin time (seconds)514.7±2.711320.25±13.120.371
Activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds)535.16±4.221354.82±38.250.277
International normalized ratio51.18±0.28131.87±1.860.427
Child-Pugh score57.4±1.52138.62±1.760.193
Child-Pugh class A/B/C52 (40%)/3 (60%)/0 (0%)132 (15.4%)/7 (53.8%)/4 (30.8%)0.280
MELD score51.32±5.021310.48±8.570.041
APRI score51.11±1.12132.64±2.220.165
AAR score50.52±0.35141.38±2.540.468
FIB-4 score52.72±1.91139.19±4.710.010
FI score5−25.98±4.7213−20.73±7.390.163
King score529.97±33.6113128.23±254.160.410
According to the location of thrombosis514
 – Left portal vein branch thrombosis – n.3 (60%)4 (28.6%)0.211
 – Right portal vein branch thrombosis – n.4 (80%)2 (14.3%)0.007
 – Main portal vein thrombosis – n.5 (100%)9 (64.3%)0.120
 – Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis – n.5 (4.8%)4 (28.6%)0.089
 – Splenic vein thrombosis – n.NA4 (28.6%)NA
According to the degree of MPV thrombosis5140.207
 – Mural thrombosis (<50%) – n.1 (20%)4 (28.6%)
 – Partial thrombosis (>50%) – n.2 (40%)4 (28.6%)
 – Total thrombosis (100%) – n.2 (40%)1 (7.1%)
Cavernous transformation of the portal vein – n.52 (40%)143 (21.4%)0.418
Clinically significant PVST – n.54 (80%)144 (28.6%)0.046
Maximal diameter of spleen (mm)5NA14153.19±37.98NA
Maximal diameter of splenic vein (mm)5NA1411.05±4.39NA
Maximal diameter of main portal vein (mm)518.18±6.271417.51±7.270.857
In-hospital mortality – n.50 (0%)141 (7.1%)0.539

Discussion

Our study found that the prevalence of PVST was 16.8% (19/113) in all patients with liver cirrhosis and was 13.3% (14/105) in cirrhotic patients after excluding splenectomy. We are confident about the data, because axial contrast-enhanced CT scans were used to more objectively detect the presence of PVST. Our data are consistent with a review by Fimognari et al. (5–20%) [4] and suggest that PVST should be a relatively frequent complication of liver cirrhosis. The most important finding of our study was that splenectomy was a very strong risk factor for the development of PVST in liver cirrhosis. Their association became closer as PVST was more severe (Supplementary Figure 1). In detail, if the severity of PVST was not restricted, the OR for splenectomy was 10.833 and 11.494 in univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively; if only patients with MPV thrombosis >50% were analyzed, the OR for splenectomy was 20.000 and 29.987 in univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively; and if only patients with clinically significant PVST were analyzed, the OR for splenectomy was 25.250 and 40.415 in univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. In addition, our study demonstrated that cirrhotic patients with splenectomy had more severe PVST but less severe liver dysfunction than those without. Thus, splenectomy might be more independent of liver dysfunction in the development of PVST in liver cirrhosis. Based on these findings, we should fully balance the clinical benefits and adverse effects of splenectomy in liver cirrhosis. The indications for splenectomy in cirrhosis should be clearly specified. On the other hand, low-quality evidence suggested that the pharmacological prophylaxis of PVST in liver cirrhosis should be effective [36]. Thus, well-designed randomized studies are needed to accurately identify the candidates for and timing of pharmacological prophylaxis of PVST in cirrhotic patients treated with splenectomy. Certainly, when its clinical significance is explained, the regions should be also taken into account. Splenectomy with porta-azygous devascularization is a major treatment option for portal hypertension and hypersplenism in China and Japan [7,10,11,16,37]. By comparison, it is rarely recommended by the practice guidelines and consensus from Western countries [38-40]. Thus, this finding may be relevant in Western populations. Theoretically, the portal pressure and risk of portal hypertension-related bleeding may be higher in cirrhotic patients with PVST than in those without. If so, the preventive and therapeutic strategy of variceal bleeding should be actively applied in patients with PVST. In agreement with this, we found a significantly higher proportion of high-risk varices in patients with PVST than in those without, but the statistical significance disappeared in other subgroup analyses due to the relatively small number of patients with MPV thrombosis >50% and clinically significant PVST (Supplementary Figure 2). On the other hand, all patients with clinically significant PVST who underwent endoscopic examinations had high-risk varices. Therefore, they should undergo careful variceal eradication before anticoagulation is initiated for the treatment of PVST in cirrhosis [41-45]. All analyses demonstrated that cirrhotic patients with PVST had significantly lower Hb than those without, which suggested a larger amount of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with PVST. However, the prevalence of AUGIB was statistically similar between patients with and without PVST. Regardless of splenectomy, all analyses showed no statistically significant association between Child-Pugh score and PVST in liver cirrhosis. Notably, after excluding patients with splenectomy, cirrhotic patients with PVST might have a higher Child-Pugh score than those without. Similarly, all but 1 analyses showed no significant association of MELD score with PVST. Notably, after excluding patients with splenectomy, MELD score was higher in cirrhotic patients PVST than in those without. Taken together, we should not neglect the role of liver dysfunction in the development of PVST in liver cirrhosis. A previous study by D’Amico et al. found that PVST is significantly associated with worse short-term prognosis of cirrhotic patients with AUGIB [46]. By comparison, our study population was not restricted to AUGIB. In this setting, the in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between patients with and without PVST. Additionally, long-term outcome was lacking in our study. Several other limitations should be clarified. First, the concentrations of coagulation and anticoagulation factors were not tested in any patients. Second, several studies suggested that abdominal surgery, such as colon and rectal surgery and sleeve gastrectomy, might increase the risk of PVST [47,48]. However, we did not identify any statistically significant association of appendicectomy and gastric and colonic surgery with the development of PVST in liver cirrhosis. It should be noted that very few patients underwent such abdominal surgery. Finally, the statistical power of our study may have been inadequate.

Conclusions

Splenectomy increases by at least 10-fold the risk of PVST in liver cirrhosis. Given the effect of PVST on the outcomes of liver cirrhosis, physicians should fully balance the benefits and risks of splenectomy for the treatment of portal hypertension and hypersplenism in liver cirrhosis. Further studies are warranted to explore the prevention of PVST after splenectomy. Characteristics of patients after excluding splenectomy. The ORs for splenectomy in the development of PVST according to the severity of PVST. The proportions of degree of esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients with and without PVST. (A) All patients. (B) Patients after excluding splenectomy.
Supplementary Table 1

Characteristics of patients after excluding splenectomy.

VariablesNValues
Age (years)10555.21±13.01; 55.19 (22.14–85.46)
Sex (Male/Female) – n.10571 (67.6%)/34 (32.4%)
Etiology of liver diseases – n.105
 – Hepatitis B virus alone32 (30.5%)
 – Hepatitis C virus alone7 (6.7%)
 – Hepatitis B + C virus3 (2.9%)
 – Alcohol30 (28.6%)
 – Hepatitis B virus + Alcohol7 (6.7%)
 – Hepatitis C virus + Alcohol1 (1%)
 – Autoimmunity5 (4.8%)
 – Drug related2 (1.9%)
 – Unknown18 (17.1%)
Disease history – n.105
 – Diabetes13 (12.4%)
 – Coronary heart disease8 (7.6%)
 – Ischemic stroke5 (4.8%)
 – Arterial hypertension9 (8.6%)
 – Deep vein thrombosis1 (1.0%)
Surgery history – n.105
 – Splenectomy0 (0%)
 – Appendicectomy3 (2.9%)
 – Gastric surgery2 (1.8%)
 – Colonic surgery1 (1%)
 – Orthopedic surgery3 (2.9%)
Abdominal trauma history – n.1051 (1%)
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding – n.10517 (16.2%)
Ascites at CT scans – n.105
 – No46 (43.8%)
 – Mild26 (24.8%)
 – Moderate-Severe33 (31.4%)
Hepatic encephalopathy – n.1046 (5.8%)
Esophageal varices at endoscopy – n.42
 – No10 (23.8%)
 – Mild2 (4.8%)
 – Moderate9 (21.4%)
 – Severe21 (50.0%)
Red blood cell (1012/L)1023.42±0.88; 3.38 (1.19–5.27)
Hemoglobin (g/L)102106.18±30.30; 107 (42–170)
White blood cell (109/L)1024.96±3.21; 4.15 (1.5–20.5)
Platelet count (109/L)10292.97±76.65; 73.5 (11–545)
Total bilirubin (umol/L)10448.44±71.87; 23.8 (5.1–436.5)
Albumin (g/L)10332.33±6.67; 32.2 (11.7–44.3)
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)10451.61±63.08; 33 (8–429)
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)10474.13±98.12; 47 (10–889)
Alakaline phosphatate (U/L)104117.67±80.09; 92 (34–524.4)
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)104159.73±222.69; 68.5 (12–1130)
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)1025.80±2.60; 5.26 (1.73–17.18)
Creatinine (umol/L)10259.42±21.61; 57 (29–151)
Potassium (mmol/L)1034.04±0.47; 4 (3.01–5.43)
Sodium (mmol/L)103138.02±6.50; 139.2 (83–144.5)
Prothrombin time (seconds)10316.34±6.55; 14.8 (11.4–62.8)
Activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds)10345.13±16.53; 42.1 (29.9–180)
International normalized ratio1031.35±0.84; 1.16 (0.77–7.96)
Child-Pugh score1007.64±2.07; 8 (5–12)
Child-Pugh class A/B/C10037 (37%)/40 (40%)/23 (23%)
MELD score1006.23±7.04; 4.86 (−5.20–34.52)
APRI score1023.28±6.18; 1.69 (0.10–56.99)
AAR score1041.33±1.70; 0.72 (0.22–10.08)
FIB-4 score1029.42±9.68; 6.97 (0.38–61.59)
FI score101−25.31±6.91; −25.24 (−39.25 – −3.85)
King score101122.54±310.00; 46.97 (1.77–2589.47)
Portal vein system thrombosis – n.10514 (13.3%)
According to the location of thrombosis
 – Left portal vein branch thrombosis – n.1054 (3.8%)
 – Right portal vein branch thrombosis – n.1052 (1.9%)
 – Main portal vein thrombosis – n.1059 (8.6%)
 – Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis – n.1055 (4.8%)
 – Splenic vein thrombosis – n.1054 (3.8%)
According to the degree of MPV thrombosis
 – Mural thrombosis (<50%) – n.1054 (3.8%)
 – Partial thrombosis (>50%) – n.1054 (3.8%)
 – Total thrombosis (100%) – n.1051 (11.1%)
Cavernous transformation of the portal vein – n.1053 (2.9%)
Clinically significant PVST – n.1054 (3.8%)
Maximal diameter of spleen (mm)105140.27±30.77; 138.2 (83.8–240.9)
Maximal diameter of splenic vein (mm)10510.68±3.83; 10.3 (4.3–29.6)
Maximal diameter of main portal vein (mm)10518.34±5.18; 18 (0–31)
In-hospital mortality – n.1054 (3.8%)
  48 in total

1.  Novel insights into the development of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis patients.

Authors:  Xingshun Qi; Hongyu Li; Xu Liu; Hui Yao; Guohong Han; Fengrong Hu; Lichun Shao; Xiaozhong Guo
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.869

2.  Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Arun J Sanyal; Norman D Grace; William Carey
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Diameter of splenic vein is a risk factor for portal or splenic vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  Katsuki Danno; Masataka Ikeda; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Tomoyuki Sugimoto; Ichiro Takemasa; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Yuichiro Doki; Morito Monden; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy with low molecular weight heparin for portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Lucio Amitrano; Maria Anna Guardascione; Antonella Menchise; Rossana Martino; Mariano Scaglione; Sabrina Giovine; Luigia Romano; Antonio Balzano
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 5.  Laparoscopic splenectomy with or without devascularization of the stomach for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension: a systematic review.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Chen; Fu-Qian He; Lie Yang; Yong-Yang Yu; Zong-Guang Zhou
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.872

6.  Therapeutic effects of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization on liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension in 204 cases.

Authors:  Zhe Cheng; Jian-wei Li; Jian Chen; Yu-dong Fan; Peng Guo; Shu-guo Zheng
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 7.  Associations of coagulation factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations with Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xingshun Qi; Weirong Ren; Valerio De Stefano; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 8.  The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD).

Authors:  Patrick S Kamath; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Upper digestive bleeding in cirrhosis. Post-therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators.

Authors:  Gennaro D'Amico; Roberto De Franchis
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Risk factors and clinical characteristics of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Mu-Xing Li; Xu-Feng Zhang; Zheng-Wen Liu; Yi Lv
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2013-10
View more
  14 in total

1.  Metabolic Disorders and Risk of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jiao Li; Qiong Wang; Mei Yang; Xiaobin Sun
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.555

2.  Effect of underdilated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on prognosis in patients with prior splenectomy: a propensity score-matched case-control study.

Authors:  Wei Yao; Jia-Cheng Liu; Yong-Juan Wu; Chong-Tu Yang; Shu-Guang Ju; Ying-Liang Wang; Chao-Yang Wang; Song-Jiang Huang; Yao-Wei Bai; Yang Chen; Tong-Qiang Li; Chen Zhou; Bin Xiong
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 3.  Research Progress in Chinese Medicine Preparations for Promoting Blood Circulation and Removing Blood Stasis for Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis Following Splenectomy.

Authors:  Ding-Qi Zhang; Yong-Ping Mu; Ying Xu; Jia-Mei Chen; Ping Liu; Wei Liu
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Percutaneous transhepatic intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for variceal bleeding with chronic portal vein occlusion after splenectomy.

Authors:  Junyang Luo; Mingan Li; Youyong Zhang; Haofan Wang; Mingsheng Huang; Zhengran Li; Junwei Chen; Chun Wu; Jiesheng Qian; Shouhai Guan; Zaibo Jiang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Consensus for management of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis (2020, Shanghai).

Authors: 
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 2.325

6.  Association Between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Hepatitis B Virus Cirrhosis Patients: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Huixian Han; Han Deng; Tao Han; Haitao Zhao; Feifei Hou; Xingshun Qi
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-07-09

7.  Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Spontaneous Splenorenal Shunt in Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Observational Study Based on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans.

Authors:  Xingshun Qi; Xiaolong Qi; Yongguo Zhang; Xiaodong Shao; Chunyan Wu; Yongji Wang; Ran Wang; Xintong Zhang; Han Deng; Feifei Hou; Jing Li; Xiaozhong Guo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-05-25

8.  Serum Lipoprotein (a) on Postoperative Day 3: A Strong Predictor of Portal and/or Splenic Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients With Splenectomy.

Authors:  Zhiyong Shi; Mingxia Zhang; Xiushan Dong; Jun Xu
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 9.  Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: Why a well-known complication is still matter of debate.

Authors:  Mariella Faccia; Maria Elena Ainora; Francesca Romana Ponziani; Laura Riccardi; Matteo Garcovich; Antonio Gasbarrini; Maurizio Pompili; Maria Assunta Zocco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Measurement of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Cirrhotic Patients with Esophageal and Gastric Varices.

Authors:  Xiaoquan Huang; Souksavanh Thansamay; Kaiqi Yang; Tiancheng Luo; Shiyao Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.