David S Brennan1, A John Spencer2, Kaye F Roberts-Thomson2. 1. Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Adelaide, 122 Frome Street, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia. david.brennan@adelaide.edu.au. 2. Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Adelaide, 122 Frome Street, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to assess the association of periodontal loss of attachment with smoking and work-family conflict and assess whether work-family conflict modifies the association of smoking and periodontal disease. METHOD: A random sample of 45-54 year olds from metropolitan Adelaide, South Australia, was surveyed by mailed self-complete questionnaire during 2004-2005. Oral examinations were performed on persons who responded to the questionnaire, providing an assessment of periodontal status. RESULTS: A total of 879 responded (participation rate = 43.8 %), with n = 709 oral examinations (completion rate = 80.7 %). Prevalence of periodontal loss of attachment (LOA) of 6+ mm was higher (p < 0.05) for smokers (23.8 %) compared to non-smokers (7.8 %) among employed adults. The adjusted prevalence ratio for LOA 6+ mm was prevalence ratio (PR) = 4.9 (95 % CI 2.2-8.8) for smokers, and there was a significant interaction (p < 0.05) between smoking status and work-family conflict. CONCLUSION: Work-family conflict modified the association of smoking with periodontal disease. Higher levels of work interfering with family were associated with higher levels of periodontal LOA for smokers compared with non-smokers.
PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to assess the association of periodontal loss of attachment with smoking and work-family conflict and assess whether work-family conflict modifies the association of smoking and periodontal disease. METHOD: A random sample of 45-54 year olds from metropolitan Adelaide, South Australia, was surveyed by mailed self-complete questionnaire during 2004-2005. Oral examinations were performed on persons who responded to the questionnaire, providing an assessment of periodontal status. RESULTS: A total of 879 responded (participation rate = 43.8 %), with n = 709 oral examinations (completion rate = 80.7 %). Prevalence of periodontal loss of attachment (LOA) of 6+ mm was higher (p < 0.05) for smokers (23.8 %) compared to non-smokers (7.8 %) among employed adults. The adjusted prevalence ratio for LOA 6+ mm was prevalence ratio (PR) = 4.9 (95 % CI 2.2-8.8) for smokers, and there was a significant interaction (p < 0.05) between smoking status and work-family conflict. CONCLUSION: Work-family conflict modified the association of smoking with periodontal disease. Higher levels of work interfering with family were associated with higher levels of periodontal LOA for smokers compared with non-smokers.
Entities:
Keywords:
45–54 year olds; Periodontal disease; Smoking status; Work-family conflict