Literature DB >> 27432323

Transitions from mono- to co- to tri-culture uniquely affect gene expression in breast cancer, stromal, and immune compartments.

Mary C Regier1,2, Lindsey J Maccoux1,2,3, Emma M Weinberger1,2, Keil J Regehr1,2, Scott M Berry1,2, David J Beebe1,2,4, Elaine T Alarid1,3,4.   

Abstract

Heterotypic interactions in cancer microenvironments play important roles in disease initiation, progression, and spread. Co-culture is the predominant approach used in dissecting paracrine interactions between tumor and stromal cells, but functional results from simple co-cultures frequently fail to correlate to in vivo conditions. Though complex heterotypic in vitro models have improved functional relevance, there is little systematic knowledge of how multi-culture parameters influence this recapitulation. We therefore have employed a more iterative approach to investigate the influence of increasing model complexity; increased heterotypic complexity specifically. Here we describe how the compartmentalized and microscale elements of our multi-culture device allowed us to obtain gene expression data from one cell type at a time in a heterotypic culture where cells communicated through paracrine interactions. With our device we generated a large dataset comprised of cell type specific gene-expression patterns for cultures of increasing complexity (three cell types in mono-, co-, or tri-culture) not readily accessible in other systems. Principal component analysis indicated that gene expression was changed in co-culture but was often more strongly altered in tri-culture as compared to mono-culture. Our analysis revealed that cell type identity and the complexity around it (mono-, co-, or tri-culture) influence gene regulation. We also observed evidence of complementary regulation between cell types in the same heterotypic culture. Here we demonstrate the utility of our platform in providing insight into how tumor and stromal cells respond to microenvironments of varying complexities highlighting the expanding importance of heterotypic cultures that go beyond conventional co-culture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compartmentalization; Heterotypic interactions; Microfluidic; Multi-culture; Principal component analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27432323      PMCID: PMC5076020          DOI: 10.1007/s10544-016-0083-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Microdevices        ISSN: 1387-2176            Impact factor:   2.838


  77 in total

1.  Expression of the hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met pathway is increased at the cancer front in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  G Edakuni; E Sasatomi; T Satoh; O Tokunaga; K Miyazaki
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.534

2.  Microfluidic platform for chemotaxis in gradients formed by CXCL12 source-sink cells.

Authors:  Yu-Suke Torisawa; Bobak Mosadegh; Tommaso Bersano-Begey; Jessica M Steele; Kathryn E Luker; Gary D Luker; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  The tumor microenvironment at a glance.

Authors:  Frances R Balkwill; Melania Capasso; Thorsten Hagemann
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane).

Authors:  D C Duffy; J C McDonald; O J Schueller; G M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Lactate is a mediator of metabolic cooperation between stromal carcinoma associated fibroblasts and glycolytic tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Yanique I Rattigan; Brijesh B Patel; Ellen Ackerstaff; George Sukenick; Jason A Koutcher; John W Glod; Debabrata Banerjee
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Greg Finak; Nicholas Bertos; Francois Pepin; Svetlana Sadekova; Margarita Souleimanova; Hong Zhao; Haiying Chen; Gulbeyaz Omeroglu; Sarkis Meterissian; Atilla Omeroglu; Michael Hallett; Morag Park
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Understanding the impact of 2D and 3D fibroblast cultures on in vitro breast cancer models.

Authors:  Kyung Eun Sung; Xiaojing Su; Erwin Berthier; Carolyn Pehlke; Andreas Friedl; David J Beebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hypoxia Affects the Structure of Breast Cancer Cell-Derived Matrix to Support Angiogenic Responses of Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Abigail Hielscher; Connie Qiu; Josh Porterfield; Quinton Smith; Sharon Gerecht
Journal:  J Carcinog Mutagen       Date:  2013

9.  Characterization of macrophage--cancer cell crosstalk in estrogen receptor positive and triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Maija Hollmén; Filip Roudnicky; Sinem Karaman; Michael Detmar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Microfluidic model of ductal carcinoma in situ with 3D, organotypic structure.

Authors:  Lauren L Bischel; David J Beebe; Kyung E Sung
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Implications of Three-Dimensional Cell Culture in Cancer Therapeutic Research.

Authors:  Kolluri Poornima; Arul Prakash Francis; Muddasarul Hoda; Mohamed Ahmed Eladl; Srividya Subramanian; Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan; Mohamed El-Sherbiny; Saad Mohamed Asseri; Abdulrahman Bashir Ahmed Hussamuldin; Krishna Mohan Surapaneni; Ullas Mony; Rukkumani Rajagopalan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  Organs-on-chips: into the next decade.

Authors:  Lucie A Low; Christine Mummery; Brian R Berridge; Christopher P Austin; Danilo A Tagle
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Breast tumor-on-chip models: From disease modeling to personalized drug screening.

Authors:  Bano Subia; Ujjwal Ranjan Dahiya; Sarita Mishra; Jessica Ayache; Guilhem Velve Casquillas; David Caballero; Rui L Reis; Subhas C Kundu
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 4.  Integrated cancer tissue engineering models for precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael E Bregenzer; Eric N Horst; Pooja Mehta; Caymen M Novak; Shreya Raghavan; Catherine S Snyder; Geeta Mehta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.