| Literature DB >> 27432170 |
Eric L Maranda1, Brian J Simmons1, Austin H Nguyen2, Victoria M Lim3, Jonette E Keri1.
Abstract
Acne keloidalis nuchae (AKN) is a chronic inflammatory condition that leads to fibrotic plaques, papules and alopecia on the occiput and/or nape of the neck. Traditional medical management focuses on prevention, utilization of oral and topical antibiotics, and intralesional steroids in order to decrease inflammation and secondary infections. Unfortunately, therapy may require months of treatment to achieve incomplete results and recurrences are common. Surgical approach to treatment of lesions is invasive, may require general anesthesia and requires more time to recover. Light and laser therapies offer an alternative treatment for AKN. The present study systematically reviews the currently available literature on the treatment of AKN. While all modalities are discussed, light and laser therapy is emphasized due to its relatively unknown role in clinical management of AKN. The most studied modalities in the literature were the 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser, 810-nm diode laser, and CO2 laser, which allow for 82-95% improvement in 1-5 sessions. Moreover, side effects were minimal with transient erythema and mild burning being the most common. Overall, further larger-scale randomized head to head control trials are needed to determine optimal treatments.Entities:
Keywords: Acne keloidalis nuchae; Hair disorders; Lasers; Systematic review; Therapy; Treatment
Year: 2016 PMID: 27432170 PMCID: PMC4972740 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-016-0134-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)
Fig. 1Systematic search of PubMed returned 558 total studies. After review of titles, abstracts, and full-text, 22 studies were included in this review
Medical management of acne keloidalis nuchae
| Study |
| Sex, M:F | Mean age (range) | Previous treatment | Therapy | Specifications | Outcome | Side effects | Mean f/u (month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinehart et al. [ | 2 | 0:2 | 23, 39 | – | 1. TAC | 1. TAC (10 mg/ml, IJ), ×2 over 2 months | 1. Favorable response. Decrease in size of papules, resolved pruritus, no new lesions at 6 months | – | 6 |
| 2.Tetracycline | 2. Tetracycline (250 mg × 4 per day, ×1 month) | 2. Decreased pain and size of lesions | |||||||
| Harris et al. [ | 1 | 1:0 | 25 | – | TAC and antibiotics | TAC (IJ) and antibiotics (top./oral) | Little improvement during active football season. Resolved spontaneously off-season | – | – |
| Layton et al. [ | 11 | 7:4 | 22.9 | Tx naïve | Cryosurgery vs. TAC | Cryosurgery: 2 × 15 s freeze–thaw cycles, spot freeze technique TAC: 5 mg, IJ | 50% of facial lesions unresponsive to tx. Palpability score correlated with response to tx ( | – | 2 |
| Goh et al. [ | 1a | 1:0 | 27 | Minocycline (PO), doxycycline (PO), mometasone furoate (top.), TAC (IJ) | Isotretinoin | 0.25 mg/kg daily. Then 20 mg every 2–3 days | Vertex of scalp: improved inflammation (in weeks). Neck: less improvement. Follicular tufting/papules: no change. Low dose maintains the vertex | – | – |
| Janjua et al. [ | 1a | 1:0 | 18 | – | Fusidic acid, cefadroxil, urea | Fusidic acid (top.), cefadroxil (PO, 500 mg bid × 2 weeks), antibiotic (PO), petrolatum and 10% urea (top.) | Marked improvement in inflammation of scalp and neck | – | 6 |
| Millán-Cayetano et al. [ | 1 | 1:0 | 26 | Cryotherapy, antibiotics (PO/top.), TAC (IJ), isotretinoin (PO), sulphone (PO) | Radiotherapy | 6 MeV linear electron accelerator, 3 Gy × 10 sessions, alternating days | Complete resolution with no recurrence at 20 months | Complete alopecia in irradiated area at 2 months, regained hair at 4 months | 20 |
f/u follow-up, IJ injection, PO per os, TAC triamcinolone, top. topical, Tx treatment
aCase of acne keloidalis nuchae associated with keratosis follicularis spinulosa decalvans
Surgical management of acne keloidalis nuchae
| Study |
| Sex, M:F | Mean age (range) | Previous treatment | Therapy | Specifications | Outcome | Side effects | Mean f/u (month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn et al. [ | 6 | 6:0 | 33.3 (25–40) | Antibiotics (top./PO), steroids (top./IJ), retinoids (top./PO) | Surgical excision | Healing by second intention | Complete wound closure ( | Postoperative bleeding ( | – |
| Pestalardo et al. [ | 1 | 1:0 | 40 | – | Tissue expansion | Expander (46 days), then local radiotherapy (weekly, total 1000 rad) | No recurrence at 2 years. Good cosmetic result | Infection (at 20 days, tx with cephalexin) | 24 |
| Califano et al. [ | 5 | – | – | – | Surgical excision | Healing by second intention | Complete wound closure ( | – | 2-48 |
| Gloster et al. [ | 25 | 25:0 | 21–45 | Varied medical management | Surgical excision | Layered closure in 1 stage ( | Surgical scar usually hidden in new hairline. Patient subjectively rated success of surgery at average of 3.8 (1–4 scale). Small recurrent papules and hypertrophic scars (tx with steroids). No complete recurrence | No postoperative bleeding, infection, dehiscence or excess pain. Hypertrophic scars were excised resulting in moderate wound-edge tension | 12 |
| Bajaj et al. [ | 2 | 2:0 | 43, 24 | 1. Clindamycin (top.), minocycline (PO) 2. Antibiotics (PO, top.), fluocinolone (top.) | Surgical excision | Healing by second intention | 1. Granulation evident by 2 weeks, re-epithelialization by 8–10 weeks. Good cosmetic result and no recurrence at 14 months 2. Excellent healing in 3 months, no recurrence at 18 months | No hypertrophic scarring | 14–18 |
| Verma et al. [ | 4 | 3:1 | 35, 40, 31, 29 | 1. None 2. TAC (IJ) | Surgical excision | – | 2. Lesion-free at 9 months | – | – |
| Beckett et al. [ | 1 | 1:0 | 63 | Various topicals and corticosteroids (IJ) | Surgical excision | Electrosurgery blended mode, 20 W. Healing by second intention | Complete closure with only a small flat scar at 5 weeks. No recurrence at 8 months | – | 8 |
| Etzkorn et al. [ | 1 | 1:0 | 44 | Steroids (IJ) | Surgical excision | Healing by second intention | Papules appeared at periphery of excision site at 5 weeks. Tx with doxycycline (100 mg bid ×30 days) and fluocinonide (top.). Complete resolution with patient satisfaction at 7 months | – | 7 |
| D’Souza et al. [ | 1 | 1:0 | 38 | – | Dermabrasion | ×3 sessions | 50% reduction in size. Referred for surgical excision | – | – |
f/u follow-up, IJ injection, PO per os, TAC triamcinolone, top. topical, Tx treatment
Light and laser treatments for acne keloidalis nuchae
| Study |
| Mean age (range) | Therapy | Specifications | Fluence (J/cm2) | Spot Size | Outcomes | Side effects | Mean f/u (month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Okoye et al. [ | 11 | 36.6 (25–45) | UVB Metal halide arc lamp 290–320 nm (peak 303 and 313 nm) | Split-scalp design 3×/week for 16 weeks on treatment side 3×/week for 8 weeks on control side | Minimal erythema dose 0.23–0.48 Increase 20% per wk for 1st 8 weeks Cumulative dose 29.7 at 8 weeks, 82.2 at 16 weeks | – | Moderate to marked improvement 34% reduction at 8 weeks 49% reduction at 16 weeks | Transient mild burning and erythema | 2 |
| Dragoni et al. [ | 1 | 23 | 595 nm PDL | PDL; 0.5 ms pulse | 6.5 | 10 mm | PDL; transient improvement with lesions recurring after 1 month | None reported | 6 |
| 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser | Nd:YAG; 2 pulses (5 and 18 ms) 4 sessions, 1 month apart | 110–120 | 4 mm | Nd:YAG; Improvement in scarring and clinical picture | |||||
| Esmat et al. [ | 16 | 31.88 (22–54) | 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser | 5 sessions 1 month apart Pulse duration 10–30 ms | 35–45 | – | Significant improvement 3 treatments 82% mean improvement after 5th session Early lesions marked (>75%) improvement Late lesions moderate to marked improvement (>51%) | Transient crusting Decreased hair density in treated area | 12 |
| Shah [ | 2 | 36, 50 | 810 nm diode laser | 4 sessions at 4–6 weeks apart | Sessions 1 and 2 fluence 23, pulse 100 ms Sessions 3 and 4 fluence 26, pulse 100 ms | _ | 90–95% clearance of lesions | Transient mild burn in one patient | 6 |
| Azurdia et al. [ | 1 | 30 | 10,600 nm CO2 laser | 1 session of laser evaporation | 150 | – | Failure to respond referred for surgical intervention | – | 1 |
| Kantor et al. [ | 8 | 31 (19-40) | 10,600 nm CO2 laser | 1 session of laser excision or evaporation | Excision 64,000 W/cm2 | 0.2 mm | No recurrence with laser excision, no general anesthesia needed Laser vaporization little benefit with recurrence | Minimal postoperative pain | 3–47 (avg. 14.8) |
| Vaporization 130–150 W/cm2, 3–4 passes | 2 mm | ||||||||
| Sattler et al. [ | 1 | 38 | 10,600 nm CO2 Laser | 1 session of laser excision Intralesional triamcinolone acetate 3 session of 400 cGY of radiation | Excision 64,000 W/cm2 | – | No recurrence with combination therapy, regrowth of hair | _ | _ |
Avg average, cGY centigray, FP Fitzpatrick skin type, Nd:YAG neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet, PDL pulse dye laser, y/o years old
aAll patients receiving light and laser therapies were male