| Literature DB >> 27431679 |
Aiko Matsushima1, Junichi Matsushima2, Akihisa Matsumoto3, Fumio Moriwaka4, Sanae Honma4, Kazunori Itoh5, Keiko Yamada5, Shun Shimohama6, Hirofumi Ohnishi7, Mitsuru Mori7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition induced by swallowing difficulties (SD) impairs the quality of life and gives rise to SD-related costs in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. With results of a swallowing difficulty questionnaire and data of resources specifically obtained such as SD-related costs, caregivers, and dietary therapies, this study is to suggest statistically supported ideas for improvements in arrangements for how participants cope with SD and maintain general well-being.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; Care foods; Caregivers; Costs; Dietary modification; PD; Swallowing difficulty
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27431679 PMCID: PMC4949767 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1467-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Basic data from the SDQ by Cohen & Manor and the scores for dietary modifications
| non SD (Under 11.0 points) | SD (At & over 11.0 points) | Score of dietary modifications goodness of fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items |
| % |
| % |
|
| |
| Gender | Male | 56 | 32.2 | 26 | 41.3 | 0.218 | |
| Female | 118 | 67.8 | 37 | 58.3 | ns | ||
| Total | 174 | 100 | 63 | 100 | 237 | ||
| Age | mean ± S.D. | 174 | 70.7 ± 8.4 | 63 | 73.2 ± 7.7 | 0.035* | 4.49 b |
| Duration of sickness (years) | mean ± S.D. | 174 | 7.3 ± 6.0 | 63 | 11.0 ± 7.3 | 0.0005* | ns |
| Severity (H&Y scale) | At & above 3 | 84 | 48.3 | 48 | 76.2 | 0.0001* | |
| Under 3 | 90 | 51.7 | 15 | 23.8 | ns | ||
| Total | 174 | 100 | 63 | 100 | 237 | ||
| Work status | No | 151 | 86.7 | 61 | 96.8 | 0.030* | |
| Yes | 23 | 13.3 | 2 | 3.2 | ns | ||
| Total | 174 | 100 | 63 | 100 | 237 | ||
| BMI | mean ± S.D. | 174 | 22.5 ± 3.5 | 63 | 22.0 ± 3.8 | 0.452 | −3.41 b |
| Outlays of | |||||||
| Eating utensils | mean ± S.D. | 174 | 0.17 ± 0.46 | 63 | 0.54 ± 1.13 | 0.014* | ns |
| Supplements | mean ± S.D. | 174 | 0.36 ± 0.92 | 63 | 0.66 ± 1.21 | 0.081 | 2.63 a |
| Presence of caregivers ( | No | 157 | 90.2 | 44 | 69.8 | 0.0003* | 4.39 b |
| Yes | 17 | 9.8 | 19 | 30.2 | |||
| Total | 174 | 100 | 63 | 100 | |||
a: p < 0.01, b: p < 0.001. *: significant, ns: non-significant, S.D.: Standard Deviation
Characteristics and goodness of fit for SD-related outlays and incomes
| Categories | Values | Age | Goodness of fit for presence of | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | median (Yen) |
| mean ± S.D. |
| mean ± S.D. | Caregivers | Spouse | Child | ||
| Overall | + | - |
| OR, CI95, | OR, CI95, | OR, CI95, | ||||
| Incomes | 2 to 4 million | 115 | 1.85 ± 0.7 | 234 | 60.0 ± 9.2 working | 72.6 ± 7.3 non-working | <0.0001* | ns | 1.80, 1.25-52.6, <0.0001*: | ns |
| Eating utensils | <5,000 | 31 | 1.50 ± 1.0 | 42 | 72.1 ± 7.7 | 71.2 ± 8.5 | 0.4731 | 3.7, 2.1-7.3, <0.0001* | ns | ns |
| Care foods | 5 to 10 thousand | 3 | 2.55 ± 1.7 | 11 | 77.8 ± 3.7 | 70.6 ± 8.4 | <0.0001* | ns | ns | ns |
| Dietary modifications | <5,000 | 55 | 1.16 ± 0.7 | 58 | 74.2 ± 7.4 | 69.8 ± 8.4 | 0.0002* | ns | ns | ns |
| Alternatives | <5,000 | 35 | 1.64 ± 1.0 | 59 | 70.8 ± 7.1 | 71.5 ± 8.7 | 0.5050 | ns | ns | ns |
| Supplements | <5,000 | 28 | 1.96 ± 1.3 | 53 | 71.0 ± 9.1 | 71.4 ± 8.1 | 0.7687 | ns | ns | 0.71, 0.48-1.41, 0.031* |
Abbreviation in table: + : for participants reporting this item; - : participants not reporting this; <: at or below the figure indicated
S.D.: Standard Deviation, *: significant
Relations among SD-related outlays and scores, with incomes and BMI
| Incomes & Outlays of | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incomes (1) | 1 | 0.0382 | 0.0028 | −0.0025 | −0.0059 | 0.0030 | 0.0978 | −0.0525 | 0.0570 |
| Eating utensils (2) | 1 | 0.2155*** | 0.0328 | 0.0855 | 0.2096** | 0.1490* | 0.2355*** | −0.1036 | |
| Care foods (3) | 1 | −0.0250 | 0.0445 | 0.0825 | 0.1349* | 0.2453*** | 0.0053 | ||
| Dietary modifications (4) | 1 | 0.0938 | 0.0168 | 0.0682 | −0.0232 | 0.0682 | |||
| Supplements (5) | 1 | 0.2108** | 0.1488* | 0.0678 | 0.1014 | ||||
| Alternatives (6) | 1 | 0.1342* | 0.0355 | 0.0160 | |||||
| Score of SD (7) | 1 | 0.3913*** | −0.0548 | ||||||
| Score of modifications (8) | 1 | −0.2184*** | |||||||
| BMI (9) | 1 |
*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.001; ***: p < 0.0001, the numbers in the Table are Spearman’s coefficients
Characteristics of caregivers at meals and persons residing with patients
| Presence of caregivers at meals | Persons residing with participants (patients) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No |
| Child only | Presence of child | Spouse only |
| |
| Age (years) | 73.9 ± 6.8 | 70.9 ± 8.5 | 0.0217* | 77.7 ± 6.2 a, b | 71.0 . ± 8.6 a | 70.8 ± 7.0 b | a: |
| PD duration (years) | 12.1 ± 7.8 | 7.6 ± 6.1 | 0.0022* | 10.7 ± 9.3 | 7.8 ± 5.4 | 8.0 ± 5.8 | ns |
| Score of SD | 12.4 ± 9.5 | 6.9 ± 7.8 | 0.0019* | 9.2 ± 8.8 | 7.6 ± 7.8 | 8.7 ± 9.1 | ns |
| Modification score | 1.7 ± 0.9 | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 0.0028* | 1.5 ± 0.9 | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | ns |
| Modified H&Y scale | 6.4 ± 1.2 | 4.3 ± 1.4 | <0.0001* | 5.1 ± 1.3 c, d | 4.4 ± 1.4 c | 4.5 ± 1.4 d | c: |
| BMI | 21.3 ± 3.6 | 22.5 ± 3.6 | ns | 21.9 ± 4.1 | 22.3 ± 3.7 | 22.5 ± 3.5 | ns |
| Goodness of fit for | Presence of caregivers at meals | Child only | Presence of child | Spouse only | |||
| Use of dietary modifications | OR: 6.8, CI: 3.1-15.2, | ns | OR: 3.4, CI: 1.2-11.4, | ns | |||
| Use of care foods | ns | ns | OR: 0.2, CI: 0.03-0.82, | ns | |||
“Presence of child” means the number of patients residing with child(ren) plus that residing with child(ren) and spouse. *: significant, ns: non-significant
a, b, c and d show values where statistical significance as per the p values in the very right hand column is reached
Characteristics of participant responses based on types of foods
| Foods | Ordinary rice &/or only | Porridge rice &/or only | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Care foods ( | Only ( | Processed side dishes ( | Care foods ( | Only ( | ||
| Items | mean ± S.D. | mean ± S.D. | mean ± S.D. | mean ± S.D. | mean ± S.D. |
|
| Age | 78.3 ± 4.2 a | 70.0 ± 8.3 a, b, c | 72.8 ± 8.3 | 77.4 ± 3.6 b | 76.3 ± 6.5 c | a: 0.018, b: 0.017, c: 0.0004 |
| PD duration | 5.8 ± 4.4 | 7.6 ± 5.8 a, b | 9.9 ± 7.0 a | 9.2 ± 6.3 | 12.3 ± 9.7 b | a: 0.049, b: 0.013 |
| Score of SD | 7.1 ± 3.8 a | 5.9 ± 6.9 b, c, d | 8.9 ± 8.0 b, e | 18.2 ± 12.8 c | 16.8 ± 9.8 a, d, e | a: 0.04. b: 0.013, c: 0.015, d: <0.0001, e: 0.003, |
| BMI | 23.4 ± 3.4 a | 22.7 ± 3.7 b | 22.0 ± 3.3 | 21.2 ± 3.2 | 20.4 ± 3.2 a, b | a: 0.035, b: 0.003 |
| Modified H&Y scale | 4.2 ± 1.3 | 4.1 ± 1.4 a, b, c | 5.0 ± 1.3 a | 5.8 ± 0.8 b | 5.3 ± 1.3 c | a: 0.001, b: 0.002, c: 0.0005 |
S.D.: Standard Deviation
a, b, c, d and e show values where statistical significance as per the p values in the very right hand column is reached
Fig. 1Mean BMI values based on types of foods. Shows mean BMI values as detailed in Table 5