Kathleen Jentsch-Ullrich1, Judith Eberhardt2, Vanja Zeremski2, Michael Koehler2, Denise Wolleschak2, Florian H Heidel3. 1. Gemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie und Onkologie, Hasselbachplatz, Magdeburg, Germany. 2. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Otto-von-Guericke University Medical Center Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. 3. Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Aging Research Center (ARC) Jena, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany. florian.heidel@med.uni-jena.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Treatment recommendations for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) are well established. Most multicenter trials investigating novel therapeutic strategies for PV are developed and conducted at university hospitals and specialized academic centers. The majority of patients in Germany, however, are treated in an outpatient (ambulatory) setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 'real-life' situation in a cohort of 1467 patients by analyzing data from a survey conducted at private practices and primary care centers. METHODS: Eligible private practices and primary care centers treating patients with MPN were recruited to participate in a paper-pencil-based survey conducted from March 2015 until March 2016 in Germany. Hematologists were asked to report from patient charts. Descriptive analyses were conducted to assess for outcomes examined by reported prognostic risk scores, symptom scores and clinical response criteria. RESULTS: In total, 34 centers participated in our retrospective survey and provided data on 1476 patients. Most patients were of older age (66.7 % older than 66 years of age), which was the main risk factor according to the criteria published by Tefferi and colleagues. Molecular status at diagnosis was not evaluated in 23 % of patients. Low rates of constitutional symptoms were reported in this physician-based survey with concentration problems, fatigue and itching being the main PV-related symptoms. Phlebotomy and hydroxyurea were the main cytoreductive measures for hematocrit control. The majority of patients were responsive (67.8 %) and tolerant (77.3 %) to hydroxyurea therapy. Interferon and JAK inhibitor therapy were used in <10 % of patients, respectively. Overall, leukocytosis, thrombocytosis and hematocrit could be effectively controlled by any therapy applied. Lack of efficacy was reported on reduction of constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly. CONCLUSIONS: The patient population investigated was older than participants in published large multicenter trials. The majority of patients were categorized as 'high risk.' Age was the main risk factor. Molecular status was unavailable in the majority of patients diagnosed prior to 2008. The physician-based survey reported on significantly lower rates of constitutional symptoms than patient-based surveys in the literature. Consistent with previously published reports, hydroxyurea is the main agent used for PV therapy in an outpatient setting resulting in efficient control of hematopoietic parameters. Constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly, however, may not be reduced efficiently, which could be improved by the use of JAK inhibitor treatment for high-risk patients in the future.
PURPOSE: Treatment recommendations for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) are well established. Most multicenter trials investigating novel therapeutic strategies for PV are developed and conducted at university hospitals and specialized academic centers. The majority of patients in Germany, however, are treated in an outpatient (ambulatory) setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 'real-life' situation in a cohort of 1467 patients by analyzing data from a survey conducted at private practices and primary care centers. METHODS: Eligible private practices and primary care centers treating patients with MPN were recruited to participate in a paper-pencil-based survey conducted from March 2015 until March 2016 in Germany. Hematologists were asked to report from patient charts. Descriptive analyses were conducted to assess for outcomes examined by reported prognostic risk scores, symptom scores and clinical response criteria. RESULTS: In total, 34 centers participated in our retrospective survey and provided data on 1476 patients. Most patients were of older age (66.7 % older than 66 years of age), which was the main risk factor according to the criteria published by Tefferi and colleagues. Molecular status at diagnosis was not evaluated in 23 % of patients. Low rates of constitutional symptoms were reported in this physician-based survey with concentration problems, fatigue and itching being the main PV-related symptoms. Phlebotomy and hydroxyurea were the main cytoreductive measures for hematocrit control. The majority of patients were responsive (67.8 %) and tolerant (77.3 %) to hydroxyurea therapy. Interferon and JAK inhibitor therapy were used in <10 % of patients, respectively. Overall, leukocytosis, thrombocytosis and hematocrit could be effectively controlled by any therapy applied. Lack of efficacy was reported on reduction of constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly. CONCLUSIONS: The patient population investigated was older than participants in published large multicenter trials. The majority of patients were categorized as 'high risk.' Age was the main risk factor. Molecular status was unavailable in the majority of patients diagnosed prior to 2008. The physician-based survey reported on significantly lower rates of constitutional symptoms than patient-based surveys in the literature. Consistent with previously published reports, hydroxyurea is the main agent used for PV therapy in an outpatient setting resulting in efficient control of hematopoietic parameters. Constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly, however, may not be reduced efficiently, which could be improved by the use of JAK inhibitor treatment for high-risk patients in the future.
Entities:
Keywords:
MPN; Myeloproliferative neoplasia; PV; Polycythemia vera
Authors: Giovanni Barosi; Gunnar Birgegard; Guido Finazzi; Martin Griesshammer; Claire Harrison; Hans Carl Hasselbalch; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Eva Lengfelder; Mary Frances McMullin; Francesco Passamonti; John T Reilly; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui Journal: Blood Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Giovanni Barosi; Gunnar Birgegard; Guido Finazzi; Martin Griesshammer; Claire Harrison; Hans Hasselbalch; Jean-Jacques Kiladijan; Eva Lengfelder; Ruben Mesa; Mary F Mc Mullin; Francesco Passamonti; John T Reilly; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Alessandro M Vannucchi; Jean Jacques Kiladjian; Martin Griesshammer; Tamas Masszi; Simon Durrant; Francesco Passamonti; Claire N Harrison; Fabrizio Pane; Pierre Zachee; Ruben Mesa; Shui He; Mark M Jones; William Garrett; Jingjin Li; Ulrich Pirron; Dany Habr; Srdan Verstovsek Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ross L Levine; Martha Wadleigh; Jan Cools; Benjamin L Ebert; Gerlinde Wernig; Brian J P Huntly; Titus J Boggon; Iwona Wlodarska; Jennifer J Clark; Sandra Moore; Jennifer Adelsperger; Sumin Koo; Jeffrey C Lee; Stacey Gabriel; Thomas Mercher; Alan D'Andrea; Stefan Fröhling; Konstanze Döhner; Peter Marynen; Peter Vandenberghe; Ruben A Mesa; Ayalew Tefferi; James D Griffin; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Stephanie J Lee; D Gary Gilliland Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Giulio Genovese; Anna K Kähler; Robert E Handsaker; Johan Lindberg; Samuel A Rose; Samuel F Bakhoum; Kimberly Chambert; Eran Mick; Benjamin M Neale; Menachem Fromer; Shaun M Purcell; Oscar Svantesson; Mikael Landén; Martin Höglund; Sören Lehmann; Stacey B Gabriel; Jennifer L Moran; Eric S Lander; Patrick F Sullivan; Pamela Sklar; Henrik Grönberg; Christina M Hultman; Steven A McCarroll Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robyn Scherber; Amylou C Dueck; Peter Johansson; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Francesco Passamonti; Bjorn Andreasson; Maria L Ferarri; Alessandro Rambaldi; Jan Samuelsson; Gunnar Birgegard; Ayalew Tefferi; Claire N Harrison; Deepti Radia; Ruben A Mesa Journal: Blood Date: 2011-05-02 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Shreekant Parasuraman; Marco DiBonaventura; Kelly Reith; Ahmad Naim; Kristen Concialdi; Nicholas J Sarlis Journal: Exp Hematol Oncol Date: 2016-02-01
Authors: Carl C Crodel; Kathleen Jentsch-Ullrich; Marcel Reiser; Lutz Jacobasch; Annette Sauer; Hans Tesch; Thomas Ulshöfer; Regine Wunschel; Francesca Palandri; Florian H Heidel Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 4.322
Authors: Alberto Alvarez-Larrán; Marta Garrote; Francisca Ferrer-Marín; Manuel Pérez-Encinas; M Isabel Mata-Vazquez; Beatriz Bellosillo; Eduardo Arellano-Rodrigo; Montse Gómez; Regina García; Valentín García-Gutiérrez; Mercedes Gasior; Beatriz Cuevas; Anna Angona; María Teresa Gómez-Casares; Clara M Martínez; Elena Magro; Rosa Ayala; Rafael Del Orbe-Barreto; Raúl Pérez-López; Maria Laura Fox; José-María Raya; Lucía Guerrero; Carmen García-Hernández; Gonzalo Caballero; Ilda Murillo; Blanca Xicoy; M José Ramírez; Gonzalo Carreño-Tarragona; Juan Carlos Hernández-Boluda; Arturo Pereira Journal: Cancer Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 6.921