Literature DB >> 27430904

Establishing a control system using QbD principles.

J Felix Kepert1, Mary Cromwell2, Niklas Engler3, Christof Finkler3, Gerald Gellermann4, Lynn Gennaro2, Reed Harris2, Raquel Iverson2, Brian Kelley2, Lynne Krummen2, Nathan McKnight2, Paul Motchnik5, Volker Schnaible3, Ron Taticek2.   

Abstract

Quality by design (QbD) is a global regulatory initiative with the goal of enhancing pharmaceutical development through the proactive design of pharmaceutical manufacturing process and controls to consistently deliver the intended performance of the product. The principles of pharmaceutical development relevant to QbD are described in the ICH guidance documents (ICHQ8-11). An integrated set of risk assessments and their related elements developed at Roche/Genentech were designed to provide an overview of product and process knowledge for the production of a recombinant monoclonal antibody. This chapter describes the elements and tools used to establish acceptance criteria and an attribute testing strategy (ATS) for product variants and process related impurities. The acceptable ranges for CQAs are set based on their potential impact on efficacy and safety/immunogenicity. This approach is focused on the management of patient impacts, rather than simply maintaining a consistent analytical profile. The ATS tools were designed to identify quality attributes that required process and/or testing controls, or that could be captured in a monitoring system to enable lifecycle management of the control strategy.
Copyright © 2016 International Alliance for Biological Standardization. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Control strategy; Critical quality attributes; Quality by design

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27430904     DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biologicals        ISSN: 1045-1056            Impact factor:   1.856


  7 in total

1.  Determination of Critical Quality Attributes for a Biotherapeutic in the QbD Paradigm: GCSF as a Case Study.

Authors:  Sumit K Singh; Deepak Kumar; Anurag S Rathore
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Micro-Heterogeneity of Antibody Molecules.

Authors:  Yusuke Mimura; Radka Saldova; Yuka Mimura-Kimura; Pauline M Rudd; Roy Jefferis
Journal:  Exp Suppl       Date:  2021

3.  Native peptide mapping - A simple method to routinely monitor higher order structure changes and relation to functional activity.

Authors:  Michel Degueldre; Annemie Wielant; Eglantine Girot; Will Burkitt; John O'Hara; Gaël Debauve; Annick Gervais; Carl Jone
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 5.857

4.  Upstream cell culture process characterization and in-process control strategy development at pandemic speed.

Authors:  Jianlin Xu; Jianfa Ou; Kyle P McHugh; Michael C Borys; Anurag Khetan
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 5.  Amorphous solid dispersions: An update for preparation, characterization, mechanism on bioavailability, stability, regulatory considerations and marketed products.

Authors:  Palpandi Pandi; Raviteja Bulusu; Nagavendra Kommineni; Wahid Khan; Mandip Singh
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.875

6.  Quality by Design risk assessments supporting approved antibody products.

Authors:  Brian Kelley
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 5.857

7.  Assessment of susceptible chemical modification sites of trastuzumab and endogenous human immunoglobulins at physiological conditions.

Authors:  Ingrid Schmid; Lea Bonnington; Monika Gerl; Katrin Bomans; Anna Louisa Thaller; Katharina Wagner; Tilman Schlothauer; Roberto Falkenstein; Boris Zimmermann; Jürgen Kopitz; Max Hasmann; Frieder Bauss; Markus Haberger; Dietmar Reusch; Patrick Bulau
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-04-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.