| Literature DB >> 27430897 |
Md Aminul Haque1, Surjya Kanta Dash2, Muhammad Abdul Baker Chowdhury3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The state of maternal healthcare (MHC) in Bangladesh is a grave concern especially in the remote haor areas. In this study, we aimed to determine the factors affecting the utilization of MHC services in the haor areas, to discover mothers' knowledge of MHC, and explore their attitudes toward MHC as well as practices in seeking MHC services.Entities:
Keywords: Antenatal care (ANC) services; Bangladesh; Hoar areas; Maternal health care (MHC); Postnatal care (PNC)
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27430897 PMCID: PMC4949891 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3296-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Distribution of the respondents by their socio-demographic characteristics
| Categories | Frequency | Percent | ||
| 15–19 | 33 | 8.3 | ||
| 20–24 | 100 | 25.0 | ||
| 25–29 | 133 | 33.3 | Mean age : 27.62 Years; | |
| 30–34 | 84 | 21.0 | ||
| 35–39 | 45 | 11.3 | ||
| 40+ | 5 | 1.3 | ||
| Total | 400 | 100.0 | ||
| Number of children | ||||
| 1 | 87 | 21.8 | ||
| 2 | 101 | 25.3 | Mean number of children:2.64/ household | |
| 3 | 118 | 29.5 | ||
| 4 | 60 | 15.0 | ||
| 5 | 31 | 7.8 | ||
| 6+ | 3 | 0.8 | ||
| Total | 400 | 100.0 | ||
| Type of family | ||||
| Nuclear family | 84 | 21.0 | ||
| Extended family | 316 | 79.0 | ||
| Total | 400 | 400 | ||
| Number of family member | ||||
| Less than 5 | 106 | 26.5 | ||
| 6–8 | 265 | 66.3 | Mean: 6.42 | |
| 9+ | 29 | 7.3 | ||
| Total | 400 | 100.0 | ||
| Occupation of the husband of the respondents | ||||
| Agriculture | 118 | 29.5 | ||
| Day Laborer | 137 | 34.3 | ||
| Small business | 120 | 30.0 | ||
| Service | 18 | 4.5 | ||
| Other | 7 | 1.8 | ||
| Total | 400 | 100 | ||
| Monthly income (TK) | ||||
| 2000–4000 | 256 | 64.0 | ||
| 4000–6000 | 93 | 23.3 | Mean: 4339.25 | |
| 6000–8000 | 36 | 9.0 | ||
| 8000–10,000 | 7 | 1.8 | ||
| 10,000–12,000 | 8 | 2.0 | ||
| Total | 400 | 100.0 | ||
| Level of education | Respondent | Husband of respondent | ||
| Frequency | Percent | Frequency | Percent | |
| No education | 151 | 37.8 | 135 | 33.8 |
| Primary (1–5) | 203 | 50.8 | 219 | 54.8 |
| Secondary (6–10) | 39 | 9.8 | 34 | 8.5 |
| Higher Secondary (11–12) | 7 | 1.8 | 5 | 1.3 |
| Graduation | – | – | 7 | 1.8 |
| Total | 400 | 100.0 | 400 | 100.0 |
Distribution of respondents by Antenatal Care Visits, sources of ANC, providers and place of delivery
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Antenatal care visits at the time of last pregnancy | ||
| Yes | 144 | 36.0 |
| No | 256 | 64.0 |
| Total | 400 | 100 |
| Source of antenatal care | ||
| Government health care institutions | 69 | 47.9 |
| Pharmacy | 28 | 19.4 |
| Quack | 47 | 32.6 |
| Total | 144 | 100.0 |
| Place of delivery | ||
| Home | 380 | 95.0 |
| Health facility | 20 | 5.0 |
| Total | 400 | 100.0 |
| Post-natal care for mothers ( | ||
| Yes | 55 | 13.8 |
| Post-natal care for child ( | ||
| Yes | 49 | 12.3 |
Distribution of respondents by problems for which they did and did not sought ANC
| Problems | Response | Percent of cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | Percent | ||
| Reason for seeking ANC | |||
| Regular check-up | 10 | 3.7 | 6.8 |
| Headache | 57 | 21.0 | 38.8 |
| High blood pressure | 11 | 4.0 | 7.5 |
| Tetanus | 9 | 3.3 | 6.1 |
| Abdominal pain | 89 | 32.7 | 60.5 |
| Injury | 17 | 6.3 | 11.6 |
| Excess vomiting | 74 | 27.2 | 50.3 |
| Other | 5 | 1.8 | 3.4 |
| Total | 272 | 100.0 | 185.0 |
| Reason for not seeking ANC | |||
| Lack of need of ANC services | 66 | 10 | 26.1 |
| Expensive | 164 | 24.8 | 64.8 |
| Lack of money | 177 | 26.8 | 70.0 |
| Too far/distance | 48 | 7.3 | 19.0 |
| Problem with transportation | 125 | 18.9 | 49.4 |
| Lack of companion | 10 | 1.5 | 4.0 |
| No permission from family | 70 | 10.6 | 27.7 |
| Total | 660 | 100.0 | 260.9 |
a Multiple responses
Socio-demographic profile by antenatal care received
| Characteristics | Antenatal care received | Total ( |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| n | % | n | % | |||
| Mothers age at birth | ||||||
| Less than 25 | 66 | 49.6 | 67 | 50.4 | 133 | |
| 25–29 | 45 | 33.8 | 88 | 66.2 | 133 | 0.000 |
| 30–34 | 27 | 32.1 | 57 | 67.9 | 84 | |
| More than 35 | 6 | 12.0 | 44 | 88.0 | 50 | |
| Birth Order | ||||||
| 1 | 48 | 55.2 | 39 | 44.8 | 87 | |
| 2 | 36 | 33.6 | 65 | 64.4 | 101 | 0.000 |
| 3 | 41 | 34.7 | 77 | 65.3 | 118 | |
| 4 | 19 | 20.2 | 75 | 79.8 | 94 | |
| Type of family | ||||||
| Nuclear family | 13 | 35.1 | 24 | 64.9 | 37 | |
| Extended family | 131 | 36.1 | 232 | 63.9 | 363 | 0.908 |
| Mother’s education | ||||||
| No education | 38 | 25.2 | 113 | 74.8 | 151 | |
| Primary | 71 | 35.4 | 132 | 65.0 | 203 | 0.000 |
| Secondary and more | 35 | 76.1 | 11 | 23.9 | 46 | |
| Husband’s education | ||||||
| No education | 32 | 23.7 | 103 | 76.3 | 135 | |
| Primary | 81 | 37.0 | 138 | 63.0 | 219 | 0.001 |
| Secondary and more | 31 | 67.4 | 15 | 32.6 | 46 | |
| Husband’s occupation | ||||||
| Agriculture | 40 | 33.9 | 78 | 66.1 | 118 | |
| Laborer | 31 | 22.6 | 106 | 77.4 | 137 | |
| Small business | 55 | 45.8 | 65 | 54.2 | 120 | 0.000 |
| Service | 14 | 77.8 | 4 | 22.2 | 18 | |
| Others | 4 | 57.1 | 3 | 42.9 | 7 | |
| Family income | ||||||
| 2000–4000 | 81 | 31.6 | 175 | 68.4 | 256 | |
| 4000–6000 | 36 | 38.7 | 57 | 61.3 | 93 | 0.000 |
| 6000–8000 | 18 | 50.0 | 18 | 50.0 | 36 | |
| More than 8000 | 9 | 60.0 | 6 | 40.0 | 15 | |
Background characteristics of participants who received ANC by different type of provider
| Background characteristics | Medically trained providers | Non-trained provider | Total ( |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBBS doctor | Nurse/paramedic | |||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |||
| Mother’s age at birth | ||||||||
| Young aged mother (≤25 years) | 23 | 34.8 | 29 | 43.9 | 14 | 21.2 | 66 | 0.022 |
| Old aged mother (>25 years) | 17 | 21.8 | 28 | 35.9 | 33 | 42.3 | 78 | |
| Birth order | ||||||||
| 1 | 21 | 43.8 | 18 | 37.5 | 9 | 18.8 | 48 | |
| 2 | 6 | 16.7 | 18 | 50.0 | 12 | 33.3 | 36 | 0.038 |
| 3 | 9 | 22.0 | 15 | 36.6 | 17 | 41.5 | 41 | |
| 4 | 4 | 21.1 | 6 | 31.6 | 9 | 47.4 | 19 | |
| Type of family | ||||||||
| Nuclear family | 4 | 30.8 | 7 | 53.8 | 2 | 15.4 | 13 | |
| Extended family | 36 | 27.5 | 50 | 38.2 | 45 | 34.4 | 131 | 0.353 |
| Mother’s education | ||||||||
| No education | 5 | 13.2 | 17 | 44.7 | 16 | 42.1 | 38 | |
| Primary | 17 | 23.9 | 29 | 40.8 | 25 | 35.2 | 71 | 0.005 |
| Secondary and more | 18 | 51.4 | 11 | 31.4 | 6 | 24.3 | 35 | |
| Husband’s education | ||||||||
| No education | 6 | 18.8 | 10 | 31.3 | 16 | 50.0 | 32 | |
| Primary | 23 | 28.4 | 33 | 40.7 | 25 | 30.9 | 81 | 0.128 |
| Secondary and more | 11 | 35.5 | 14 | 45.2 | 6 | 19.4 | 31 | |
p-values obtained from Chi-Squire test
Place of delivery according to background characteristics
| Background characteristics | Home | THC/ UFWC | Total ( |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | |||
| Mother’s age at birth | 0.000 | |||||
| Young aged mother (≤25) | 117 | 88.0 | 16 | 12.0 | 133 | |
| Old aged mother (>25) | 263 | 98.5 | 4 | 1.5 | 267 | |
| Birth Order | 0.000 | |||||
| 1 | 74 | 85.1 | 13 | 14.9 | 87 | |
| 2 | 97 | 96.0 | 4 | 4.0 | 101 | |
| 3 | 117 | 99.2 | 1 | 0.8 | 118 | |
| 4 | 92 | 97.9 | 2 | 2.1 | 94 | |
| Type of family | 0.001 | |||||
| Nuclear family | 31 | 83.8 | 6 | 16.2 | 37 | |
| Extended family | 349 | 96.1 | 14 | 3.9 | 363 | |
| Mother’s education | 0.111 | |||||
| No education | 143 | 94.7 | 8 | 5.3 | 151 | |
| Primary | 196 | 96.6 | 7 | 3.4 | 203 | |
| Secondary and more | 41 | 89.1 | 5 | 10.9 | 46 | |
| Husband’s education | 0.301 | |||||
| No education | 127 | 94.1 | 8 | 5.9 | 135 | |
| Primary | 211 | 96.3 | 8 | 3.7 | 219 | |
| Secondary and more | 42 | 91.3 | 4 | 8.7 | 46 | |
p-values obtained from Chi-Squire test
Percentage of the respondents received postnatal care by some socio-economic and demographic factor
| Background characteristics | Postnatal care received | Total |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| N | % | N | % | N | ||
| Mother’s age at birth | ||||||
| Young aged mother (≤25) | 29 | 21.8 | 104 | 78.2 | 133 | 0.506 |
| Old aged mother (>25) | 50 | 18.7 | 217 | 81.3 | 267 | |
| Mother’s education | ||||||
| No education | 22 | 14.6 | 129 | 85.4 | 151 | |
| Primary | 46 | 22.7 | 157 | 77.3 | 203 | 0.126 |
| Secondary and more | 11 | 23.9 | 35 | 76.1 | 46 | |
| Husband’s education | ||||||
| No education | 20 | 14.8 | 115 | 85.2 | 135 | |
| Primary | 49 | 22.4 | 170 | 77.6 | 219 | 0.208 |
| Secondary and more | 10 | 21.7 | 36 | 78.3 | 46 | |
p-values obtained from Chi-Squire test
Logistic regression estimates for use of antenatal care
| Independent variable | Regression coefficient | Odds ratio = Exp (B) | 95 % C.I. for Exp (B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Mother’s age at last birth | ||||
| Less than 25 years (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| 25 years and more | −0.390 | 0.677 | .372 | 1.232 |
| Birth order | ||||
| First birth (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| Second birth and more | −0.414 | 0.661 | .333 | 1.314 |
| Mother’s education | ||||
| No education (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| Primary | 1.248 | 3.378* | 1.394 | 8.696 |
| Secondary and more | 1.217 | 3.482* | 1.495 | 7.631 |
| Husband’s education | ||||
| No education (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| Primary | 0.888 | 2.429 | .984 | 6.001 |
| Secondary and more | 0.576 | 1.779 | 0.825 | 3.839 |
| Monthly family income | ||||
| Less than Tk. 2500 (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| TK. 2500 and more | .084 | 1.087 | 0.657 | 1.799 |
| Occupation of husband | ||||
| Laborer (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| Other than laborer | 0.488 | 1.630 | .932 | 2.849 |
| Constant | −1.092 | .336 | ||
| HosmerLomshow test = Chi-square 7.942 sig. 0.439 | ||||
| −2 Log likelihood = 466.256 | ||||
| Nagelekerke R. = .188 | ||||
* = p <0.05, RC reference category
Logistic regression estimate for place of delivery of respondents
| Independent variable | Regression coefficient | Odds ratio = Exp (B) | 95 % C.I. for Exp (B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Mother’s age at last birth | ||||
| Less than 25 years (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| 25 years and more | −1.436 | 0.24* | 0.059 | 0.954 |
| Birth order | ||||
| First birth (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| Second birth and more | −0.971 | 0.379 | 0.115 | 1.251 |
| Family type | ||||
| Nuclear family (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| Extended family | −0.920 | 0.399 | 0.135 | 1.181 |
| Constant | 4.314 | 74.725 | ||
| HosmerLomshow test = Chi-square 5.73, sig. 0.125 | ||||
| −2 Log likelihood = 133.33 | ||||
| Nagelekerke R. = .188 | ||||
* = p <0.05, RC reference category
Logistic regression estimates for assistance at delivery of respondents
| Independent variable | Regression coefficient | Odds ratio = Exp (B) | 95 % C.I. for Exp (B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Mother’s age at last birth | ||||
| Less than 25 years (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| 25 years and more | 0.009 | 1.009 | 0.475 | 2.142 |
| Birth order | ||||
| First birth (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| Second birth and more | 0.626 | 1.871 | 0.832 | 4.208 |
| Family type | ||||
| Nuclear family (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| Extended family | 0.057 | 1.059 | .438 | 2.558 |
| Mother’s education | ||||
| No education (RC) | 1.00 | |||
| Primary | −.783 | 0.457* | 0.179 | 0.948 |
| Secondary and more | −0.887 | 0.412* | 0.216 | 0.968 |
| Constant | −1.024 | .359 | ||
| HosmerLomshow test = Chi-square 1.72, sig. 0.786 | ||||
| −2 Log likelihood = 357.33 | ||||
| Nagelekerke R. = 0.056 | ||||
* = p <0.05, RC reference category