Literature DB >> 27430261

Vertical stratification of adult mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) within a tropical rainforest in Sabah, Malaysia.

Hayley L Brant1, Robert M Ewers2, Indra Vythilingam3, Chris Drakeley4, Suzan Benedick5, John D Mumford6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malaria cases caused by Plasmodium knowlesi, a simian parasite naturally found in long-tailed and pig-tailed macaques, are increasing rapidly in Sabah, Malaysia. One hypothesis is that this increase is associated with changes in land use. A study was carried out to identify the anopheline vectors present in different forest types and to observe the human landing behaviour of mosquitoes.
METHODS: Mosquito collections were carried out using human landing catches at ground and canopy levels in the Tawau Division of Sabah. Collections were conducted along an anthropogenic disturbance gradient (primary forest, lightly logged virgin jungle reserve and salvage logged forest) between 18:00 and 22:00 h.
RESULTS: Anopheles balabacensis, a vector of P. knowlesi, was the predominant species in all collection areas, accounting for 70 % of the total catch, with a peak landing time of 18:30-20:00 h. Anopheles balabacensis had a preference for landing on humans at ground level compared to the canopy (p < 0.0001). A greater abundance of mosquitoes were landing in the logged forest compared to the primary forest (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between mosquito abundance in the logged forest and lightly logged forest (p = 0.554). A higher evening temperature (p < 0.0001) and rainfall (p < 0.0001) significantly decreased mosquito abundance during collection nights.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential ability of An. balabacensis to transmit P. knowlesi between canopy-dwelling simian hosts and ground-dwelling humans, and that forest disturbance increases the abundance of this disease vector. These results, in combination with regional patterns of land use change, may partly explain the rapid rise in P. knowlesi cases in Sabah. This study provides essential data on anthropophily for the principal vector of P. knowlesi which is important for the planning of vector control strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anopheles balabacensis; Deforestation; Malaysia; Plasmodium knowlesi; Vector

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27430261      PMCID: PMC4950076          DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1416-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malar J        ISSN: 1475-2875            Impact factor:   2.979


Background

Malaria still remains a public health problem throughout tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world, with an estimated 214 million new cases and 438,000 deaths in 2015 [1]. Four Plasmodium species are recognised as causing human malaria; Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium vivax, but recently a fifth species, Plasmodium knowlesi, has been recognized as causing symptomatic malaria in humans [2-4]. Plasmodium knowlesi, transmitted by the forest-dwelling Anopheles from the Leucosphyrus group, is an emerging cause for zoonotic human malaria in Southeast Asia [3, 5–7]. Malaysia has had a successful malaria control programme, aimed to eliminate malaria by 2020, with marked reductions in reported cases of P. falciparum and P. vivax, but there has been a recent increase in P. knowlesi cases [8-11]. Plasmodium knowlesi is now the most common cause of malaria in the Malaysian state of Sabah, accounting for 62 % of all malaria incidences in 2013 and presenting a threat to malaria elimination [8]. It has been proposed that land use change, including deforestation, forest fragmentation and agricultural practices, has increased the incidence of P. knowlesi by increasing the encroachment of humans into previously forested areas, allowing a higher interaction between vectors and human and macaque hosts [9, 12]. The increase in P. knowlesi cases may also be underestimated due to misdiagnosis during microscopic examination [13, 14]. Microscopy of stained blood smears allows differentiation between species, but frequent misdiagnosis occurs in areas containing P. falciparum, P. vivax and P. knowlesi [14]. Monkeys, particularly the long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) and the pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina) found in Southeast Asia, are the two main natural hosts of P. knowlesi [15]. A study in Sabah showed nearly all patients with P. knowlesi malaria had a recent history of forest or forest-edge exposure, and had seen a monkey in the preceding month [16]. Most members of the Leucosphyrus group, from the genus Anopheles, feed primarily on monkeys in the canopy and are capable of transmitting various Plasmodium species [17]. Anopheles balabacensis is the predominant vector of human malaria in Sabah [18, 19], and has also been incriminated as a P. knowlesi vector [20, 21]. Most primates are arboreal. Although some species of chimpanzees, baboons and macaques rest and feed at ground level during the day, primates almost always sleep in the canopy during the night [22]. As Anopheles species generally bite between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m., primate roosting sites are potentially a key location for disease transmission between primate hosts. It is hypothesized that vectors are biting humans at ground level, but if given the opportunity, will bite at canopy level. This study expects that key vector species should be present in the disturbed forest habitats where people come into contact with monkeys, but it is unknown which species should expect to be present in primary forest. Since transmission is increasing in Sabah, it is important to identify the P. knowlesi vectors present and understand their biting behaviour within forest habitats. While other vector assessments are ongoing in the Interior, West Coast, Kudat and Sandakan Divisions in Sabah, the Tawau Division has not been studied. This study was conducted to determine the vertical distribution of mosquitoes and their biting preference in Sabah, Malaysia.

Methods

Study site

The study was conducted in the Tawau Division of Sabah, Malaysia. Three areas were selected along a forest disturbance gradient; primary lowland dipterocarp rainforest (PF), virgin jungle reserve (VJR) and twice-logged disturbed dipterocarp rainforest (LF) with forest disturbance quantified using on-the-ground forest plots [23]. Primary forest survey points were selected in the vicinity of Danum Valley Field Centre (4°58′N, 117°42′E), located within the Danum Valley Conservation Area. This area consists of 43,800 ha of protected dipterocarp rainforest [24]. Virgin jungle reserve (4°40′N, 117°32′E) and logged forest survey points (4°41′N, 117°34′E) were selected within the Benta Wawasan oil palm plantation. The 45,601 ha area is a mixture of twice-logged rainforest, virgin jungle reserve, acacia and oil palm. The VJR, of 2200 ha, has been logged around the edge, but never logged in the steep interior [25]. Survey points were selected 500–1000 m from the VJR edge in locations that had undergone light logging. Logged forest survey points were in selectively twice-logged forest, logged during 1970s, 1990s–2000s resulting in the cumulative removal of ~180 m3 ha−1 of timber [26], and currently being further disturbed by additional salvage logging activity in surrounding areas. Further details of the project area are given by Ewers et al. [25]. Three survey points, with a minimum separation distance of 500 m, were selected in each area. One tree was selected at each point based on its accessibility into the canopy, low density of epiphytes and height. Visual tree assessments were carried out to make sure every tree was safe to climb. The trees selected ranged from a height of 15 m in the logged forest to 30 m in the virgin jungle reserve and primary forest. Survey points were a subset of those designated as part of the central sampling design of the ‘Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems (SAFE) Project’, a large-scale fragmentation experiment, which is investigating the long-term effects of forest fragmentation [25].

Data collection

All data collection was carried out from April to July 2014, and mosquitoes were collected using human landing catches at ground and canopy height between 18:00 and 22:00 h. Four consecutive nights of collections were carried out in PF and VJR, and five nights in LF, using a rotation of collectors. Access was gained into the canopy using line insertion to high branches [27], followed by the double rope climbing technique taught by Canopy Access Limited [28]. Canopy samples were collected at a height of two-thirds the average canopy height at that location (10–20 m). Ground and canopy collections were conducted simultaneously. The average canopy height surrounding each selected tree was calculated using a laser rangefinder. The collectors, with the aid of a red torch-light, aspirated mosquitoes off their own legs. Collected mosquitoes were placed into cups covered with a net cloth, and a new cup was used during every half an hour of collection. Mosquitoes were taken back to the field laboratory to be killed and sorted into individual tubes with silica gel. All mosquitoes were identified morphologically using keys [29-35].

Meteorological data

Air temperature (°C) and relative humidity (%) were measured at each site using microclimate dataloggers at the base and in the canopy of each tree during sampling. Nightly rainfall (mm) data were obtained from the nearest rain gauges located at SAFE Project and Danum Valley Field Centre for the duration of the field survey (March to July 2014; range 1.0–3.5 km from sample sites). In addition, lunar illumination (%), cloud cover and unusual climatic events (e.g. strong winds) were recorded every half an hour by the collectors.

Data analysis

Analyses were performed using R version 3.1.1 [36]. Simpson and Shannon diversity indices were calculated in each area using the vegan function ‘diversity’ (R package vegan, ‘diversity’) [37]. Species accumulation curves were calculated in each area using the vegan function ‘specaccum’ (R package vegan, ‘specaccum’) [37]. To estimate the number of undetected species and add them to the observed richness, true richness estimators were used. These estimators included the Chao species estimator (Chao 1) and Abundance Coverage Estimator (ACE). Chao 1 and ACE were used to estimate the extrapolated species richness in each area using ‘chao1’ and ‘ACE’ functions in the R package ‘fossil’ (R package fossil, ‘chao1’, ‘ACE’) [38]. The effect of canopy height (a dichotomous variable representing ground or canopy level) and forest disturbance (PF, VJR and LF) on mosquito abundance was analysed using a generalized linear mixed-effect model (R package lme4) [39], using day and site as random factors, with Poisson error distribution. Chi squared tests were used to compare the relative abundance of vector and non-vector species in each area, and between ground and canopy level. Differences in community composition at ground and canopy height were explored using Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA, vegan function ‘decorana’) [37]. The number of mosquitoes landing per night was used as a measure of relative abundance. Significant differences were tested for in community composition using a linear model with the first DCA axis as the response variable against canopy height and forest disturbance.

Results

Mosquito abundance

A total of 807 mosquitoes were collected from 39 human landing catch nights, consisting of 743 (92.1 %) anophelines, and 64 (7.9 %) culicines. A total of 555 (68.8 %) mosquitoes from 21 species were found at ground level in comparison to 252 (31.2 %) mosquitoes from 10 species at canopy level. Anopheles balabacensis was the predominant species at ground (62.4–87.5 % of all individuals) and canopy level (43.4–73.5 %) at each collection site. A full list of species is given in Table 1.
Table 1

Mosquitoes collected from different collection sites in the district of Tawau, Sabah, Malaysia

Mosquito genera and speciesNumber collected at:
Primary forestVirgin jungle reserveLogged forest
GroundCanopyGroundCanopyGroundCanopy
Am. orbitae 000010
An. Aitkenii group00210180
An. barbirostris 001030
An. sp. a 0010103
An. balabacensis 21128323296130
An. latens 011511
An. macarthuri 01104165
An. maculatus 1072124
An. watsonii 163151411
Arm. confusus 001000
Arm. jugraensis 000050
Arm. sp. a 001000
Col. pseudotaeniatus 001000
Coq. crassipes 000101
Cx. sitiens 000051
Cx. vishnui 000020
Cx. (Lophoceraomyia) 000010
Do. ganapathi 1203416
Pr. ostentatio 001000
Ph. prominens 000010
Stg. albopicta 000040
Stg. sp. a 001042
Ve. sp. a 001013
Total mosquitoes242213353398177
No. of collection nights121212121515
Mosquitoes/nights21.811.14.4226.511.8

aCouldn’t be identified to species level

Mosquitoes collected from different collection sites in the district of Tawau, Sabah, Malaysia aCouldn’t be identified to species level The number of species collected, Shannon index, Simpson index, Chao1 and ACE varied across forest disturbance and between ground and canopy level (Tables 2, 3). The Chao 1 and ACE predicted a higher number of species in the logged forest than the primary forest, and a higher number of species at ground level (Tables 2, 3). These patterns were also seen with the number of species collected, Shannon index and Simpson index. The species accumulation curves did not reach an asymptote at ground and canopy level, indicating not all species of mosquitoes had been collected (see Additional file 1).
Table 2

Mean species richness and diversity indices (±SE) of mosquito communities, collected at ground level

Forest disturbanceHuman landing catches
NSpecies no.Shannon indexSimpson indexChao1ACE
PF1240.06 (0.04)0.45 (0.14)77
VJR12140.70 (0.10)0.40 (0.05)5019.4
LF15180.88 (0.12)0.43 (0.06)30.519.8

Mean species richness and diversity indices (±SE) of mosquito communities, collected at ground level using human landing catches, in primary forest PF, virgin jungle reserve VJR and logged forest LF

Table 3

Mean species richness and diversity indices (±SE) of mosquito communities, collected at canopy level

Forest disturbanceHuman landing catches
NSpecies no.Shannon indexSimpson indexChao1ACE
PF1250.24 (0.13)0.65 (0.12)76
VJR1270.71 (0.15)0.50 (0.09)7.57.36
LF15110.56 (0.11)0.32 (0.06)15.512.41

Mean species richness and diversity indices (±SE) of mosquito communities, collected at canopy level using human landing catches, in primary forest PF, virgin jungle reserve VJR and logged forest LF

Mean species richness and diversity indices (±SE) of mosquito communities, collected at ground level Mean species richness and diversity indices (±SE) of mosquito communities, collected at ground level using human landing catches, in primary forest PF, virgin jungle reserve VJR and logged forest LF Mean species richness and diversity indices (±SE) of mosquito communities, collected at canopy level Mean species richness and diversity indices (±SE) of mosquito communities, collected at canopy level using human landing catches, in primary forest PF, virgin jungle reserve VJR and logged forest LF

Effect of height and forest disturbance on mosquito abundance

Mosquito abundance in the canopy was significantly lower than at ground level (χ2 = 81.89, df = 1, p < 0.0001) (Table 4; Fig. 1a). Logged forest had a higher abundance than virgin jungle reserve or primary forest (χ2 = 10.94, df = 2, p < 0.05) (Fig. 1a). Similar patterns were seen with abundance of An. balabacensis (Table 4; Fig. 1b). Rainfall and a higher evening temperature decreased mosquito abundance (χ2 = 14.55, df = 1, p < 0.0001), whereas moonlight increased the abundance (χ2 = 4.49, df = 1, p < 0.05) (Table 4). Collector identity had no effect on mosquito abundance (χ2 = 3.871, df = 2, p = 0.144). Peak biting of An. balabacensis during the collection period was observed between 19:00 and 20:00 h in logged forest and virgin jungle reserve (Fig. 2).
Table 4

Effects of parameters on mosquito abundance

PredictorAll species Anopheles balabacensis
βSEzpβSEzp
Intercept10.3671.2418.356<0.0001***10.2331.4237.190<0.0001***
Height−0.0500.006−8.804<0.0001***−0.0600.007−8.348<0.0001***
Area PF−2.2680.545−4.165<0.0001***−2.1470.676−3.1760.001**
Area VJR−0.3070.518−0.5930.554−0.6330.657−0.9650.335
Temperature−0.2950.047−6.330<0.0001***−0.3070.053−5.788<0.0001***
Rainfall−0.4270.100−4.306<0.0001***−0.4480.115−3.883<0.0001***
Moonlight0.0060.0032.1290.033*0.0070.0032.5070.012*

Effects of height, area and habitat characteristics on daily mosquito abundance of all species combined, and on Anopheles balabacensis abundance separately in primary forest PF, virgin jungle reserve VJR and logged forest LF. Coefficient estimates (β), standard errors, associated Wald’s z-score, and p values are given

Fig. 1

Effects of collection height on the human landing rate across a forest disturbance gradient. Effects of collection height on the human landing rate (number of mosquitoes per night per bait) across a forest disturbance gradient: primary forest (PF), lightly logged virgin jungle reserve (VJR), and twice-logged forest (LF). a Total abundance of all species combined, b Abundance of the most common species, Anopheles balabacensis, alone. Error bars show ± SE of the mean

Fig. 2

Hourly number of Anopheles balabacensis landing per person per night. Hourly number of Anopheles balabacensis landing per person per night, at ground and canopy level, across an anthropogenic disturbance gradient from a Primary forest, b Virgin jungle reserve and c Logged forest. Error bars show ± SE of the mean

Effects of parameters on mosquito abundance Effects of height, area and habitat characteristics on daily mosquito abundance of all species combined, and on Anopheles balabacensis abundance separately in primary forest PF, virgin jungle reserve VJR and logged forest LF. Coefficient estimates (β), standard errors, associated Wald’s z-score, and p values are given Effects of collection height on the human landing rate across a forest disturbance gradient. Effects of collection height on the human landing rate (number of mosquitoes per night per bait) across a forest disturbance gradient: primary forest (PF), lightly logged virgin jungle reserve (VJR), and twice-logged forest (LF). a Total abundance of all species combined, b Abundance of the most common species, Anopheles balabacensis, alone. Error bars show ± SE of the mean Hourly number of Anopheles balabacensis landing per person per night. Hourly number of Anopheles balabacensis landing per person per night, at ground and canopy level, across an anthropogenic disturbance gradient from a Primary forest, b Virgin jungle reserve and c Logged forest. Error bars show ± SE of the mean

Community composition

The DCA plot indicated that the community composition of the canopy was significantly different to ground level collection and across forest disturbance, with the community from the two height strata being strongly separated on the first axis (F1, 60 = 24.72, p < 0.0001, Fig. 3). The communities in the three categories of forest disturbance were not separated along the first axis (F2, 60 = 0.92, p = 0.4), but the interaction between height and forest disturbance was significant (F2, 60 = 8.37, p < 0.001). The first two axes accounted for 66.9 % of the total variance. Anopheles balabacensis was prevalent at both ground and canopy level, but the ground level community also included species such as Anopheles barbirostris, Armigeres jugraensis, Culex vishnui and the Anopheles Aitkenii group, which were not present in the canopy. The species turnover that causes the difference in community composition between ground and canopy was driven by species that have not been reported to cause disease transmission.
Fig. 3

Detrended correspondence analysis for adult mosquito abundance at ground level and in the canopy. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) plot showing the major axes of variation for adult mosquito abundance at ground level and in the canopy of a tropical rainforest. The two axes represent linear summaries of the variation in the species numbers and areas

Detrended correspondence analysis for adult mosquito abundance at ground level and in the canopy. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) plot showing the major axes of variation for adult mosquito abundance at ground level and in the canopy of a tropical rainforest. The two axes represent linear summaries of the variation in the species numbers and areas

Discussion

Studying the anthropophily of simian malaria vectors in the canopy of tropical forests is essential because the hosts are primarily arboreal. In order to develop, sustain or adapt a good control programme, it is important to monitor mosquito populations as well as their hosts and host-seeking preference, distribution and behaviour. Although previous studies in Southeast Asia have used monkey-baited traps at different canopy heights [12, 40, 41], this is the first study to attempt human landing catches, using this method, in the canopy. This study found that there was a higher abundance and human landing rate of mosquitoes at ground level, where people tend to be, than in the canopy where the simian hosts reside. This trend was driven by An. balabacensis, a key malaria vector in Sabah, and highlights the potential importance of this species in transmitting Plasmodium species from simian to human hosts. Anopheles balabacensis was the most abundant mosquito in all sampled areas, accounting for 70 % of all collected species. Anopheles balabacensis is considered the most important vector of human malaria parasites on Banggi Island and mainland Sabah, Malaysia [18, 19, 30, 42]. In Sabah, An. balabacensis was found to be mainly exophagic, but could also be endophagic and exophilic [30, 43]. These behaviours cause An. balabacensis to be an effective vector of P. knowlesi from human to primate hosts. There were also two distinct subpopulations, one more zoophilic and one more anthropophilic [44-46]. Anopheles balabacensis occurs in forested areas, and readily bites human and monkey hosts, making it an ideal vector of simian malaria [20, 47]. Currently insecticide-treated bed nets and indoor residual spraying are the two main control methods in Malaysia [48]. This study showed An. balabacensis bites as early as 18:00 h in the Tawau Division. Other studies have shown the species bites as early as 18:00 h in recent years in comparison to late night biters in previous decades [44, 49–51]. Given that An. balabacensis is early evening biting, highly anthropophilic, exophagic and exophilic, current control methods are not sufficient to break the transmission cycle of P. knowlesi [52]. In Vietnam and Cambodia, long-lasting insecticidal hammocks (LLIH) were shown to reduce malaria incidence and prevalence in forested areas, and may prove to be an additional effective tool in reduction of malaria in Malaysia [52-54]. The use of repellents have been used for malaria control, but need to be tested in forest and plantations areas. This study found a different community composition of mosquitoes in the canopy to that at ground level. Different mosquito species have particular flight distributions, with certain species flying and feeding close to ground, some species showing a preference for higher canopy heights, while others show a random distribution [55, 56]. The percentage biting at different canopy heights can be affected by microclimate conditions, such as relative humidity, temperature, wind speed and rainfall [57, 58], but may also change according to time of day [59]. Moonlight appeared to have a significant impact on mosquito activity, with human landing rates increasing on bright nights. Although some studies have shown moonlight increases relative abundance of biting vectors [60-64], others have shown a decrease [65-68] or no effect at all [69]. Collection bias was reduced in this study by collecting in each area under different phases of the moon. This study also showed how forest disturbance affected mosquito abundance, species richness and human landing rates. Vector abundance was greater in the lightly modified virgin jungle reserve and heavily modified logged forest than in the unmodified primary forest. These results may be explained by the availability of larval breeding sites. Wheel tracks in logged areas due to logging activities can provide breeding sites for a range of mosquito species, whereas wheel tracks are not present within primary forests or virgin jungle reserves [31]. Species richness, estimated by the Chao1 index and ACE, differed across forest disturbance and height, with logged forest and ground level having a higher species richness than primary forest and canopy.

Conclusions

This study has given an overview of mosquito species found in the Tawau Division, including the anthropophily of P. knowlesi vectors at canopy and ground levels. Anophelesbalabacensis was the predominant species found in primary forest, virgin jungle reserve and logged forest with a preference for landing on humans at ground level. As An. balabacensis is a vector of human and simian malaria, these findings will be useful for the planning of control strategies of malaria vectors.
  44 in total

Review 1.  A large-scale forest fragmentation experiment: the Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems Project.

Authors:  Robert M Ewers; Raphael K Didham; Lenore Fahrig; Gonçalo Ferraz; Andy Hector; Robert D Holt; Valerie Kapos; Glen Reynolds; Waidi Sinun; Jake L Snaddon; Edgar C Turner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Does moonlight influence the biting behaviour of Anopheles funestus?

Authors:  A Kampango; N Cuamba; J D Charlwood
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 2.739

3.  Illustrated keys to the mosquitoes of Thailand I. Background; geographic distribution; lists of genera, subgenera, and species; and a key to the genera.

Authors:  Rampa Rattanarithikul; Bruce A Harrison; Prachong Panthusiri; Russell E Coleman
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.267

4.  Illustrated keys to the mosquitoes of Thailand. IV. Anopheles.

Authors:  Rampa Rattanarithikul; Bruce A Harrison; Ralph E Harbach; Prachong Panthusiri; Russell E Coleman; Prachong Panthusiri
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 0.267

5.  Six new species of the Anopheles leucosphyrus group, reinterpretation of An. elegans and vector implications.

Authors:  M A M Sallum; E L Peyton; R C Wilkerson
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.739

6.  STUDIES ON MALARIA AND ANOPHELES BALABACENSIS IN CAMBODIA.

Authors:  D E EYLES; R H WHARTON; W H CHEONG; M WARREN
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1964       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 7.  Plasmodium knowlesi: the emerging zoonotic malaria parasite.

Authors:  Spinello Antinori; Laura Galimberti; Laura Milazzo; Mario Corbellino
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.112

8.  A prospective comparative study of knowlesi, falciparum, and vivax malaria in Sabah, Malaysia: high proportion with severe disease from Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax but no mortality with early referral and artesunate therapy.

Authors:  Bridget E Barber; Timothy William; Matthew J Grigg; Jayaram Menon; Sarah Auburn; Jutta Marfurt; Nicholas M Anstey; Tsin W Yeo
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Limitations of microscopy to differentiate Plasmodium species in a region co-endemic for Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium knowlesi.

Authors:  Bridget E Barber; Timothy William; Matthew J Grigg; Tsin W Yeo; Nicholas M Anstey
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Bionomics of Anopheles latens in Kapit, Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo in relation to the transmission of zoonotic simian malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi.

Authors:  Cheong H Tan; Indra Vythilingam; Asmad Matusop; Seng T Chan; Balbir Singh
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 2.979

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Ecological Linkage Mechanisms in Plasmodium knowlesi Transmission and Spread.

Authors:  Gael Davidson; Tock H Chua; Angus Cook; Peter Speldewinde; Philip Weinstein
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  The drivers of avian-haemosporidian prevalence in tropical lowland forests of New Guinea in three dimensions.

Authors:  Celia Vinagre-Izquierdo; Kasun H Bodawatta; Kryštof Chmel; Justinn Renelies-Hamilton; Luda Paul; Pavel Munclinger; Michael Poulsen; Knud A Jønsson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 3.  Non-Human Primate Malaria Infections: A Review on the Epidemiology in Malaysia.

Authors:  Nor Diyana Dian; Mohd Amirul Fitri A Rahim; Sherwin Chan; Zulkarnain Md Idris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  Human-mediated impacts on biodiversity and the consequences for zoonotic disease spillover.

Authors:  Caroline K Glidden; Nicole Nova; Morgan P Kain; Katherine M Lagerstrom; Eloise B Skinner; Lisa Mandle; Susanne H Sokolow; Raina K Plowright; Rodolfo Dirzo; Giulio A De Leo; Erin A Mordecai
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 10.900

5.  Shifts in mosquito diversity and abundance along a gradient from oil palm plantations to conterminous forests in Borneo.

Authors:  Katherine I Young; Michaela Buenemann; Nikos Vasilakis; David Perera; Kathryn A Hanley
Journal:  Ecosphere       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.171

6.  Environmental and spatial risk factors for the larval habitats of Plasmodium knowlesi vectors in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo.

Authors:  Tock H Chua; Kimberly M Fornace; Isabel Byrne; Wilfredo Aure; Benny O Manin; Indra Vythilingam; Heather M Ferguson; Chris J Drakeley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Investigating the Contribution of Peri-domestic Transmission to Risk of Zoonotic Malaria Infection in Humans.

Authors:  Benny O Manin; Heather M Ferguson; Indra Vythilingam; Kim Fornace; Timothy William; Steve J Torr; Chris Drakeley; Tock H Chua
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-10-14

8.  Individual-level factors associated with the risk of acquiring human Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in Malaysia: a case-control study.

Authors:  Matthew J Grigg; Jonathan Cox; Timothy William; Jenarun Jelip; Kimberly M Fornace; Patrick M Brock; Lorenz von Seidlein; Bridget E Barber; Nicholas M Anstey; Tsin W Yeo; Christopher J Drakeley
Journal:  Lancet Planet Health       Date:  2017-06-09

9.  Abundance and distribution of sylvatic dengue virus vectors in three different land cover types in Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo.

Authors:  Katherine I Young; Stephanie Mundis; Steven G Widen; Thomas G Wood; Robert B Tesh; Jane Cardosa; Nikos Vasilakis; David Perera; Kathryn A Hanley
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Evaluation of electric nets as means to sample mosquito vectors host-seeking on humans and primates.

Authors:  Frances Hawkes; Benny Obrain Manin; Sui Han Ng; Stephen J Torr; Chris Drakeley; Tock H Chua; Heather M Ferguson
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.