| Literature DB >> 27429883 |
M J Lynch1, M J Mulvaney2, S C Hodges1, T L Thompson1, W E Thomason1.
Abstract
Cover crops are a major focus of conservation agriculture efforts because they can provide soil cover and increase nutrient availability after their mineralization in cropping systems. To evaluate the effect of residue type and placement on rate of decomposition and carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) mineralization, residues from two food crops, maize (Zea mays L.) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and two promising cover crops, sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) and sorghum sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench x S. bicolor var. Sudanese [Piper] Stapf) were used in a litterbag study in the Central Plateau region of Haiti from May to September, 2013. Residues were placed in litterbags at a rate equivalent to 3.25 Mg residue ha(-1) either on the soil surface or buried at 15 cm to represent a tilled and no-tillage system, respectively. Initial C:N ratios were: maize > common bean > sorghum sudangrass > sunn hemp. Highest residue mass loss rates and C and N mineralization generally occurred in the reverse order. Overall, surface-placed residues decomposed more slowly with 40 and 17 % of initial residue mass of surface and buried residues, respectively, remaining at 112 days. Carbon and N mineralization was higher when residues were buried. Net N mineralization of buried residues was 0.12, 0.07, 0.06, and 0.03 g N g residue(-1) for sunn hemp, sorghum sudangrass, maize, and common bean, respectively over 112 days. To achieve the goal of increasing nutrient supply while maintaining year-round cover, a combination of grass and legume cover crops may be required with benefits increasing over multiple seasons.Entities:
Keywords: Conservation agriculture; Cover crop; Haiti; No tillage; Nutrient cycling
Year: 2016 PMID: 27429883 PMCID: PMC4932013 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2651-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Initial physical and chemical parameters for soil (0–15 cm) at the Corporant experimental site, 2013
| pHa | 7.4 |
| NO3-Nb (mg/kg) | 2.1 |
| NH4-Nb (mg/kg) | 1.8 |
| Total N (mg/kg) | 1412 |
| Phosphorusc (mg/kg) | 12 |
| Potassiumd (mg/kg) | 87 |
| Magnesiumd (mg/kg) | 328 |
| Calciumd (mg/kg) | 5438 |
| Cation Exchanged (meq/100 g) | 30 |
| Organic Mattere (%) | 1.6 |
| Sandf (%) | 41 |
| Siltf (%) | 38 |
| Clayf (%) | 21 |
a1:1 soil water
bNH4-N and NO3-N: 2 M KCL; automated flow injection analysis
cNaHCO3 extraction
dMehlich 1 extraction
eLoss on ignition
fHydrometer method
Initial nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) concentrations and C:N ratio for plant residues used in the litterbag decomposition study
| Residue | N (%) | C (%) | C:N |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maize | 0.65 | 36.7 | 56.4 |
| Sorghum sudangrass | 1.09 | 34.3 | 31.4 |
| Common beana | 0.64 | 34.8 | 54.4 |
| Sunn hemp | 1.23 | 36.9 | 30.0 |
aCommon bean residue was weathered post-harvest
Fig. 1Daily average temperature and cumulative rainfall near Corporant, Haiti, May to September, 2013
Fig. 2Buried and surface-placed maize and sorghum sudangrass residue mass loss (dry weight basis) over 112 days
Regression equations and statistics for residue mass loss, on a percent dry weight basis, over 112 days, where X = time in days after application
| Residue species and placement | Equation | RMSEa | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maize, buried | y = 66.65e−0.0123x + 33.35e−17.3890x | 6.214 | 0.974 |
| Maize, surface | y = 100e−0.006x | 5.152 | 0.939 |
| Sorghum sudangrass, buried | y = 100e−0.026x | 6.806 | 0.940 |
| Sorghum sudangrass, surface | y = 100e−0.007x | 9.476 | 0.665 |
| Common bean, buried | y = 100e−0.012x | 7.873 | 0.915 |
| Common bean, surface | y = 100e−0.004x | 6.777 | 0.609 |
| Sunn hemp, buried | y = 52.30e−0.0079x + 47.70e−0.3136x | 3.742 | 0.990 |
| Sunn hemp, surface | y = 63.44e−0.0001x + 37.76e−0.0306x | 7.932 | 0.863 |
aRoot mean square error
Regression equations and statistics for change in mass of residue N remaining over 112 days, where X = time in days after application
| Residue species and placement | Equation | RMSEa | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maize, buried | y = 0.03e−0.0010x + 0.03e−1.0601x | 0.007 | 0.910 |
| Maize, surface | y = 0.36e−0.0069x + 0.02e−22.3816x | 0.003 | 0.976 |
| Sorghum sudangrass, buried | y = −0.20 + 0.28e−0.0022x | 0.012 | 0.829 |
| Sorghum sudangrass, surface | y = 0.05e−0.0055x + 0.02e−0.6272x | 0.003 | 0.978 |
| Common bean, buried | y = 0.02 + 0.02e−0.0210x | 0.005 | 0.799 |
| Common bean, surface | y = 0.03 + 0.02e−0.0236x | 0.004 | 0.793 |
| Sunn hemp, buried | y = 0.05e−0.0087x + 0.07e−0.3640x | 0.015 | 0.916 |
| Sunn hemp, surface | y = 0.04 + 0.09e−0.0561x | 0.007 | 0.972 |
aRoot mean square error
Fig. 3Buried and surface-placed common bean and sunn hemp residue mass loss (dry weight basis) over 112 days
Fig. 4Net N mineralization from buried and surface-placed maize and sorghum sudangrass residue over 112 days
Fig. 5Net N mineralization from buried and surface-placed common bean and sunn hemp residue over 112 days
Regression equations and statistics for change in residue C:N ratio over 112 days, where X = time in days after application
| Residue species and placement | Equation | RMSEa | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maize, buried | y = 35.04e−0.0040x + 20.94e−0.0579x | 2.184 | 0.985 |
| Maize, surface | y = 40.56e−0.0020x + 14.66e−0.0586x | 2.335 | 0.961 |
| Sorghum sudangrass, buried | y = 21.44e−0.0021x + 10.03e−0.3034x | 1.209 | 0.969 |
| Sorghum sudangrass, surface | y = 31.27 − 0.2126x | 1.411 | 0.944 |
| Common bean, buried | y = 21.88 + 32.50e−0.0283x | 8.769 | 0.734 |
| Common bean, surface | y = 17.26 + 41.10e−0.0093x | 2.235 | 0.966 |
| Sunn hemp, buried | y = 11.04e−0.0623x + 21.85e−0.0048x | 7.306 | 0.670 |
| Sunn hemp, surface | y = 20.26e−0.0006x + 9.98e−0.3873x | 1.418 | 0.939 |
aRoot mean square error
Fig. 6Net C mineralization from buried and surface-placed maize and sorghum sudangrass residue over 112 days
Fig. 7Net C mineralization from buried and surface-placed common bean and sunn hemp residue over 112 days
Regression equations and statistics for change in mass of residue C remaining over 112 days, where X = time in days after application
| Residue species and placement | Equation | RMSEa | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maize, buried | y = 0.03e−0.0010x + 0.03e−1.0601x | 0.007 | 0.910 |
| Maize, surface | y = 0.36e−0.0069x + 0.02e−22.3816x | 0.003 | 0.976 |
| Sorghum sudangrass, buried | y = −0.20 + 0.28e−0.0022x | 0.012 | 0.829 |
| Sorghum sudangrass, surface | y = 0.05e−0.0055x + 0.02e−0.6272x | 0.003 | 0.978 |
| Common bean, buried | y = 0.02 + 0.02e−0.0210x | 0.005 | 0.799 |
| Common bean, surface | y = 0.03 + 0.02e−0.0236x | 0.004 | 0.793 |
| Sunn hemp, buried | y = 0.05e−0.0087x + 0.07e−0.3640x | 0.015 | 0.916 |
| Sunn hemp, surface | y = 0.04 + 0.09e−0.0561x | 0.007 | 0.972 |
aRoot mean square error
Fig. 8Buried and surface-placed maize and sorghum sudangrass residue C:N ratio over 112 days
Fig. 9Buried and surface common bean and sunn hemp residue C:N ratio over 112 days