| Literature DB >> 27428972 |
Jianghong Mao1, Fangyuan Xu2, Qian Gao3,4, Shenglin Liu5,6, Weiliang Jin7, Yidong Xu8.
Abstract
Corrosion cracking of reinforced concrete caused by chloride salt is one of the main determinants of structure durability. Monitoring the entire process of concrete corrosion cracking is critical for assessing the remaining life of the structure and determining if maintenance is needed. Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensing technology is extensively developed in photoelectric monitoring technology and has been used on many projects. FBG can detect the quasi-distribution of strain and temperature under corrosive environments, and thus it is suitable for monitoring reinforced concrete cracking. According to the mechanical principle that corrosion expansion is responsible for the reinforced concrete cracking, a package design of reinforced concrete cracking sensors based on FBG was proposed and investigated in this study. The corresponding relationship between the grating wavelength and strain was calibrated by an equal strength beam test. The effectiveness of the proposed method was verified by an electrically accelerated corrosion experiment. The fiber grating sensing technology was able to track the corrosion expansion and corrosion cracking in real time and provided data to inform decision-making for the maintenance and management of the engineering structure.Entities:
Keywords: Fiber Bragg Grating; corrosion cracking; reinforced concrete; reinforcement corrosion; structural health monitoring
Year: 2016 PMID: 27428972 PMCID: PMC4970139 DOI: 10.3390/s16071093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Mechanical model of reinforced concrete corrosion.
Figure 2Schematic of FBG sensor technology.
Figure 3Design and embedding of CCM-FBG.
Figure 4Schematic of the structure of CCM-FBG.
Figure 5Layout of the calibration test.
Figure 6Calibration results of strain for CCM-FBG.
Simple linear regression model of the wavelength/strain coefficient.
| Senor | Wavelength/Strain Coefficient | Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| CCM-FBG (S)-1 | 0.0016 | 0.998 |
| CCM-FBG (S)-2 | 0.0007 | 0.996 |
| CCM-FBG (S)-3 | 0.0007 | 0.999 |
Figure 7Calibration results of temperature for CCM-FBG: (a) CCM-FBG (S); (b) CCM-FBG (T).
Simple linear regression model of the wavelength/temperature coefficient.
| Sensor | Wavelength/Temperature Coefficient | Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| CCM-FBG (S)-1 | 0.01944 | 0.998 |
| CCM-FBG (S)-2 | 0.02316 | 0.995 |
| CCM-FBG (S)-3 | 0.02593 | 0.997 |
| CCM-FBG (T)-1 | 0.01107 | 0.999 |
| CCM-FBG (T)-2 | 0.01247 | 0.996 |
| CCM-FBG (T)-3 | 0.00972 | 0.999 |
Figure 8Layout of the accelerated corrosion experiment.
Figure 9Concrete strain over the course of the accelerated corrosion experiment.
Figure 10Stage of electrically accelerated corrosion cracking.