Literature DB >> 27428440

Chronic Kidney Disease, Time in Therapeutic Range and Adverse Clinical Outcomes in Anticoagulated Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Observations from the SPORTIF Trials.

Marco Proietti1, Deirdre A Lane1, Gregory Y H Lip2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Our objectives were to study clinical features associated with CKD in AF patients and the impact of CKD on anticoagulation control, as reflected by time in therapeutic range (TTR). We also determined the impact of CKD and TTR in predicting adverse outcomes. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analysed pooled datasets from SPORTIF III and V trials, including 3646 patients assigned to warfarin with data on renal function. CKD (creatinine clearance <60ml/min) was present in 952 (26%) patients. TTR was higher in patients with normal renal function compared to those with CKD (p<0.001). On logistic analysis, chronic AF and male sex were associated with TTR>70%, whilst diabetes mellitus, aspirin use and CKD were inversely associated with TTR>70%. On Cox regression analysis, CKD was an independent predictor for stroke (p=0.006) and death (p<0.001). TTR>70% was independently associated with a lower risk of stroke (p=0.024), death (p=0.001) and major bleeding (p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: CKD is highly prevalent amongst AF patients and a risk factor for stroke and death. Adjusting for CKD, good quality anticoagulation control (TTR>70%) was an independent predictor for lower risks of stroke, death and major bleeding.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic kidney disease; Clinical outcomes; Major bleeding; Non-valvular atrial fibrillation; Stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27428440      PMCID: PMC4919727          DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EBioMedicine        ISSN: 2352-3964            Impact factor:   8.143


Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in non-valvular AF patients, ranging from 26% to 32%, especially in the elderly (Apostolakis et al., 2013, Banerjee et al., 2013). The presence of CKD in AF patients is associated with a greater risk of adverse clinical outcomes, including stroke, thromboembolism and bleeding. In the Danish nationwide cohort study, for example, the presence of CKD amongst patients with AF was significantly associated with an increased risk for stroke/systemic embolism (by 1.49-fold), all-cause mortality (by 2.37-fold), myocardial infarction (by 2-fold) and major bleeding (by 1.33-fold) (Olesen et al., 2012). Warfarin use amongst such patients has been associated with a substantial risk reduction in overall event rates, with a positive net clinical benefit (Bonde et al., 2014). Similarly, the Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation Project confirmed the high risk associated with CKD in patients with AF (Banerjee et al., 2014, Banerjee et al., 2013). In clinical trial populations, CKD also confers a much higher relative risk for both stroke and bleeding (Apostolakis et al., 2013, Piccini et al., 2013). When Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs, e.g. warfarin) are used for thromboprophylaxis, good quality anticoagulation control, as reflected by time in therapeutic range (TTR) > 70% is recommended (De Caterina et al., 2013). Limited information been reported on the relationship between CKD and TTR in AF patients, but good TTR has been associated with lower risks of thromboembolism and bleeding (Connolly et al., 2008, Friberg et al., 2014, Pokorney et al., 2015). In this study, our objectives were to study clinical features associated with CKD in AF patients; second, we studied the impact of CKD on anticoagulation control, as reflected by the time in therapeutic range (TTR). Third, we determined the impact of CKD as a risk factor for stroke, myocardial infarction, major bleeding and death amongst warfarin-treated AF patients, after adjustment for TTR as measure of anticoagulation control.

Methods

For the present analysis, we used the pooled study populations of the Stroke Prevention using an Oral Thrombin Inhibitor in patients with atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) III and V trials. The original protocol and principal results have been previously described (Albers et al., 2005, Halperin, 2003, Olsson, 2003). In brief, the SPORTIF trials were two multicentre phase III clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of the direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, against warfarin in patients with non-valvular AF. SPORTIF III was an open label trial, while SPORTIF V was a double blind study (Halperin, 2003). Signed, informed consent was required from each participant in accordance with protocol regulations approved by the local review boards governing research involving human subjects, and the Declaration of Helsinki. In both SPORTIF trials, ximelagatran was non-inferior in efficacy and safety as warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF patients (Lip, 2005) but due to hepatotoxicity, ximelagatran was withdrawn. For the purpose of this study, we studied only SPORTIF patients assigned to warfarin treatment where complete information on renal function was available.

Thromboembolic Risk and Anticoagulation Control

Thromboembolic risk was categorised according to both CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (Gage et al., 2004, Lip et al., 2010). Based on CHADS2, patients were categorised as “low risk” when with CHADS2 = 0, “moderate risk” with CHADS2 = 1 and “high risk” when CHADS2 ≥ 2 (Gage et al., 2004). Based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score, “low risk” was defined as a CHA2DS2-VASc 0 in males or 1 in females; “moderate risk” as male patients with CHA2DS2-VASc = 1; and “high risk” with CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 2 (Camm et al., 2012, Lip et al., 2015). Anticoagulation control, as reflected by the TTR was calculated using the standardized Rosendaal interpolation method (Rosendaal et al., 1993), by assigning an INR value to each day between two successive observed INR values. The percentage of time that the interpolated INR remained between 2.0 and 3.0 was used to establish TTR value, and the cut-off value for defining optimal anticoagulation was a mean individual TTR of ≥ 70% (De Caterina et al., 2013).

Renal Function

Renal function was based on the estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl), using the 4-item Cockroft-Gault formula [(140 − age) ∗ (weight in kg) ∗ (0.85 if female) / (72 ∗ creatinine)]. Accordingly, an estimated CrCl level of < 60 ml/min was used to define CKD, based on established guidelines (“K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification.,” 2002).

Study Outcomes

Principal clinical outcomes were based on the original study protocol, and were centrally adjudicated (Halperin, 2003). Stroke was defined as the acute onset of a focal neurological deficit in any of the carotid, vertebral or cerebral artery distribution territories lasting > 24 h. As per the SPORTIF trials protocol, myocardial infarction (MI) diagnosis required 2 out of 3 of the following criteria: (i) typical chest pain lasting at least 20 min; (ii) electrocardiographic changes clearly indicating an acute MI; (iii) significant, i.e. > 2 × upper limit, elevation of cardiac biomarkers (creatine kinase-MB, troponin). Based on the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria (Schulman and Kearon, 2005), major bleeding was defined by one of the following: clinically overt bleeding with a concomitant fall in haemoglobin levels > 2 g/dl or requiring blood transfusion of at least 2 units of whole blood or erythrocytes; bleeding episode involving a critical site.

Statistical Analysis

All continuous variables were tested for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Variables with normal distribution were expressed as means and standard deviations (SD), and tested for differences using a t-test. Non-parametric variables were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR) and differences tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables, expressed as counts and percentages, were analysed by chi-squared test. A linear regression analysis between CrCl and TTR was performed, adjusted for type of AF and thromboembolic risk. Regression analysis was performed in order to establish clinical factors significantly associated with the presence of CKD. All variables different between the two groups at the baseline with a level of significance of at least p < 0.10 underwent a univariate analysis, and those predictors with a level significance of p < 0.10 were inserted into a forward multivariate logistic model. To determine the factors associated with a TTR > 70%, both for general population and CKD-only population, all baseline clinical variables underwent univariate analyses and those predictors with a level significance of p < 0.10 were inserted into a forward multivariate logistic model. In order to explore the incremental value of TTR in determining events occurrence, a correlation analysis between TTR and hazard risk for study outcomes was performed using Pearson product-moment correlation test, both for the overall cohort and stratified according to CKD presence. Correlation coefficients were then compared using the z test, after being processed with Fisher transformation. Survival analysis, assessed by an intention-to-treat approach, was performed according to the presence of CKD and differences in survival distributors between subgroups were analysed using the Log-Rank test. Evaluation of the clinical characteristics significantly associated with outcomes was performed using a Cox proportional hazards analysis, corrected according to thromboembolic risk, performed with CKD both as a categorical variable and CrCl as a continuous variable. All demographic variables, comorbidities and risk factors analysed at baseline underwent a univariate analysis. All variables with a p-value < 0.10 for the association with clinical outcome at the univariate analysis, were inserted into the forward stepwise multivariate model. A backward model was then performed to verify the results of the forward one. A two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS v. 22.0 (IBM, NY, USA) and R v. 3.2.1 (The R Foundation).

Results

The pooled study population constituted 7329 patients, of which 3665 were assigned to the warfarin treatment arm. Complete data on renal function were available for 3646 (99.5%) [Fig. 1]. Of the selected cohort, 30.5% (n = 1113) were female, median age was 72 [IQR 66–77] years, and median CrCl was 78.60 [59.1–102.1] ml/min. Of the entire cohort, 10.8% (n = 393) had paroxysmal AF.
Fig. 1

Patients included in this analysis.

Prevalence of CKD and Associated Clinical Characteristics

CKD (defined as CrCl < 60 ml/min) was present in 952 (26.1%) patients. Clinical characteristics of patients with and without CKD are shown in Table 1. Patients with CKD were significantly older (p < 0.001), more commonly female (p < 0.001) or paroxysmal AF (p = 0.009) and a lower median weight (p < 0.001). CKD patients had more prevalent coronary heart disease (CHD) (p = 0.042) and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (p < 0.001). Thromboembolic risk was higher in patients with CKD compared to those with normal renal function, whether based on CHADS2 (median [IQR] 2 [2-2] vs. 2 [1-2] respectively, p < 0.001) and CHA2DS2-VASc (median [IQR] 4 [3-5] vs. 3 [2-3], p < 0.001).
Table 1

Patient characteristics in relation to baseline renal function.

N (%)Normal renal function (≥ 60 ml/min)N = 2694Chronic kidney disease (< 60 ml/min)N = 952p
Age, years (median [IQR])70 [64–75]78 [74–82]< 0.001
Weight, kg (median [IQR])89 [78–100]70 [61–79]< 0.001
Female656 (24.4)457 (48.0)< 0.001
Creatinine clearance, ml/min88.86 [74.02–111.57]49.77 [43.01–55.25]< 0.001
Type of atrial fibrillation (n = 3644)0.009
 Paroxysmal269 (10.0)124 (13.0)
 Chronic2424 (90.0)827 (87.0)
Heart rate (n = 3510), per min76 [67–87]73 [64–86]< 0.001
Hypertension2082 (77.3)717 (75.3)0.216
Diabetes mellitus652 (24.2)205 (21.5)0.095
Current smoker272 (10.1)58 (6.1)< 0.001
Coronary heart disease1162 (43.2)447 (46.9)0.042
Chronic heart failure988 (36.7)378 (39.7)0.097
Previous stroke/TIA485 (18.0)263 (27.6)< 0.001
Previous bleeding154 (5.7)54 (5.7)0.958
Aspirin use518 (19.2)205 (21.6)0.119
TTR (n = 3606), % (median [IQR])69.6 [56.7–80.2]66.6 [51.9–76.8]< 0.001
TTR > 70% (n = 3606)1307 (48.9)390 (41.8)< 0.001
Median [IQR] CHADS22 [1–2]2 [2–2]< 0.001
CHADS2 score
 099 (3.7)13 (1.4)
 11233 (45.8)196 (20.6)< 0.001
 ≥ 21362 (50.6)743 (78.0)
Median [IQR] CHA2DS2-VASc3 [2–3]4 [3–5]< 0.001
CHA2DS2-VASC risk class< 0.001
 Low risk8 (0.3)1 (0.1)
 Intermediate risk457 (17.0)19 (2.0)
 High risk2229 (82.7)932 (97.9)

Legend: BPM = beats per minute; IQR = interquartile range; TIA = transient ischemic attack; TTR = time in therapeutic range. Low risk = male patients with CHA2DS2-VASC 0 or female patients with CHA2DS2-VASC 1; intermediate risk = male patients with CHA2DS2-VASC 1; high risk = all patients with CHA2DS2-VASC ≥ 2.

On multivariable logistic regression analysis, clinical characteristics significantly associated with the presence of CKD were age (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.16 per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.18, p < 0.001), weight (OR for any kg 0.92, 95% CI 0.91–0.92, p < 0.001), paroxysmal AF (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.23–2.27, p = 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.16–1.86, p = 0.001), chronic heart failure (CHF) (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.32–1.96, p < 0.001), and previous stroke/TIA (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13–1.75, p = 0.002).

Relationship between CKD and TTR

Median TTR in the whole cohort was 68.6% [IQR 56.5–80.6%], being significantly higher in patients with normal renal function when compared with CKD patients (p < 0.001). Also, the proportion with TTR > 70% was more prevalent in patients with normal renal function (p < 0.001). After adjustment for type of AF and thromboembolic risk, a linear relationship was found between CrCl and TTR (standardized beta: 0.054, p = 0.003) [Fig. 2]. On multivariable logistic analysis, the presence of chronic AF (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.25–1.94, p < 0.001) and male sex (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01–1.35, p = 0.033) were positively associated with a TTR > 70%. Conversely, a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.96, p = 0.011), concomitant use of aspirin (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63–0.88, p < 0.001) and the presence of CKD (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67–0.92, p = 0.002) were negatively associated with achieving a TTR > 70%.
Fig. 2

Scatterplot and regression line between creatinine clearance and TTR

Legend = TTR: time in therapeutic range.

In the CKD subgroup (n = 952), the weight (OR per kg 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.02, p = 0.041), the presence of CHF (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05–1.81, p = 0.022) and chronic AF (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.22–2.81, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with TTR > 70%.

Impact of CKD in Predicting Adverse Clinical Outcomes

After a median [IQR] follow-up time of 1.6 [1.3–1.8] years, 504 events (13.8% of patients) were recorded, as follows: 90 strokes (17.9% of total events), 52 myocardial infarctions (10.3%), 198 deaths (39.3%) and 164 major bleeding events (32.5%).

Stroke

Stroke was more common in CKD patients than in patients with normal renal function (2.6% patient-years vs. 1.3% patient-years, respectively), with the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for stroke being 1.99 (95% CI: 1.30–3.03, p = 0.001). With CrCl as a continuous variable, every decrease of 10 ml/min was associated with a higher risk of stroke (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00–1.14, p = 0.048). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, CKD patients had a higher risk of stroke compared to patients with normal renal function (Log-Rank test: 10.56; p = 0.001) [Fig. 3, Panel A]. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, a clinical history of CHD (p = 0.045), a previous stroke/TIA (p < 0.001) and the presence of CKD (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors associated with the occurrence of stroke, while TTR > 70% (p = 0.004) was inversely associated with the risk of stroke (Table 2). Cox regression analysis performed using CrCl as a continuous variable (Table 2) shows that its influence in determining stroke risk became non-significant, after adjusting for other clinical risk factors (p = 0.337). A backward selection model also confirmed these results. TTR and HR for occurrence of stroke were inversely correlated (r = − 0.772, p < 0.001). Similarly, there was a significant correlation between TTRs and stroke HRs according to renal function subgroups [Fig. 4, Panel A] (r = − 0.569, p < 0.001). A significant difference when comparing the two correlation coefficients for the overall cohort and stratified according to CKD presence, respectively (z = 8.61, p < 0.001).
Fig. 3

Cumulative event-free survival in patients according to the presence of chronic kidney disease.

Panel A) Stroke p = 0.001; Panel B) Major bleeding p = 0.002; Panel C) Death p < 0.001.

Legend = Solid line: normal renal function; dashed line: CKD.

Table 2

Multivariable Cox regression analysis for clinical outcomes performed with chronic kidney disease as a categorical variable or creatinine clearance as a continuous variable.


Multivariable analysis
Hazard ratio95% CIp
Categorical variable
Stroke
 TTR > 70%0.630.41–0.980.040
 Coronary heart disease1.541.01–2.340.042
 Chronic kidney diseasea1.821.19–2.800.006
 Previous stroke/TIA2.231.44–3.44< 0.001
Major bleeding
 TTR > 70%0.580.42–0.800.001
 Age (per year)1.031.01–1.050.009
 Chronic heart failure1.401.02–1.920.036
Death
 TTR > 70%0.630.47–0.840.002
 Female0.660.47–0.920.013
 Chronic heart failure1.531.14–2.040.003
 Current smoker1.541.00–2.380.049
 Coronary heart disease1.771.32–2.37< 0.001
 Chronic kidney diseasea2.581.92–3.46< 0.001



Continuous variable
Stroke
 TTR > 70%0.600.39–0.930.024
 Coronary heart disease1.541.01–2.340.045
 Previous stroke/TIA2.181.40–3.380.001
Major bleeding
 TTR > 70%0.580.42–0.800.001
 Age (per year)1.031.01–1.050.009
 Chronic heart failure1.401.02–1.920.036
Death
 TTR > 70%0.610.46–0.820.001
 Female0.690.49–0.960.029
 Current smoker1.551.00–2.380.047
 Chronic heart failure1.581.19–2.120.002
 Coronary heart disease1.751.30–2.35< 0.001
 Creatinine clearance (per 10 ml/min decrease)1.131.07–1.19< 0.001

Legend: CI = confidence interval; TIA = transient ischemic attack; TTR = time in therapeutic range.

Creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min.

Fig. 4

Correlation between TTR and hazard risk according to presence of chronic kidney disease.

Panel A) Stroke p < 0.001; Panel B) Major bleeding p < 0.001; Panel C) Death p < 0.001.

Legend = Cross and solid line: normal renal function; square and dashed line: CKD.

Myocardial Infarction

The crude incidence rate of MI was similar between those with CKD and normal renal function (1.1% and 0.9% patient-years, respectively). No significant association was found between CKD and MI (unadjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.66–2.18, p = 0.563).

Major Bleeding

Major bleeding was more common in patients with CKD than in those with normal renal function (4.6% patient-years, vs. 2.8% patient-years, respectively). Similar to stroke, patients with CKD had a significantly higher risk of a major bleeding event, compared to those with normal renal function (Log-Rank: 10.03; p = 0.002) [Fig. 3, Panel B]. CKD conferred a higher risk of major bleeding (unadjusted HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.21–2.31, p = 0.002). This risk was non-significant when CrCl was considered as a continuous variable (per decrease of 10 ml/min, HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99–1.09, p = 0.093). On multivariable analysis (see Table 2), increasing age (p = 0.009) and clinical history of CHF (p = 0.036) were risk factors for major bleeding; conversely, TTR > 70% (p = 0.007) was independently associated with less major bleeding. Entering CrCl in the analysis as a continuous variable did not affect the multivariable model (Table 2). Similar data were obtained when performing a backward selection model. When correlating TTR and HR for major bleeding, a significant inverse relationship was found in the overall cohort (r = − 0.527, p < 0.001). When performed with HR according to renal function subgroups [Fig. 4, Panel B], there was a numerical reduction in correlation coefficient (r = − 0.490, p < 0.001), but this was non-significant (z = 1.57, p = 0.116).

All-cause Death

A higher rate of death was found in patients with CKD compared to those with normal renal function (crude incidence rate 6.4% patient-years vs. 2.5% patient-years; unadjusted HR 2.54 (95% CI 1.92–3.36, p < 0.001)). As for stroke, a decrease of 10 ml/min in CrCl was found associated with a higher risk of death (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08–1.20, p < 0.001). Survival analysis confirmed a higher mortality of patients with CKD compared to patients with normal renal function (Log-Rank test: 45.62; p < 0.001) [Fig. 3, Panel C]. Multivariable Cox regression analysis (Table 2) shows that female sex (p = 0.013) and TTR > 70% (p = 0.002) were independently associated with a lower risk of death; conversely, a clinical history of CHF (p = 0.004), CHD (p < 0.001), smoking habit (p = 0.049) and the presence of CKD (p < 0.001) were risk factors associated with an increased risk of death. When the Cox multivariable analysis was performed using CrCl as a continuous variable, a decrease of 10 ml/min was associated with a higher risk of death (Table 2). No difference was found when backward selection model was performed. Similar to stroke, there was significant inverse correlation between unadjusted HR for death and TTR (r = − 0.676, p < 0.001), but the correlation coefficient was reduced (r = − 0.478, p < 0.001) when stratifying according to CKD presence [Fig. 4, Panel C]. The difference between correlation coefficients was significant (z = 8.40, p < 0.001).

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate that more than a quarter of AF patients have CKD, and that age, female sex, CHF, previous stroke/TIA and the occurrence of paroxysmal AF were significantly associated with CKD in AF patients. Second, we found a linear association between CrCl and TTR in AF, and those patients with CKD had poorer anticoagulation control, as shown by a lower TTR when compared to patients with normal renal function. Importantly, the presence of CKD was negatively associated with achieving a TTR > 70%. Third, CKD was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of stroke and death, independently from TTR; however, no significant association was found between CKD and both myocardial infarction or major bleeding after adjusting for TTR. Conversely, adequate anticoagulation control as expressed by TTR > 70% was inversely associated with major bleeding. Clinical factors associated with CKD have been previously reported in a smaller real-world’ populations of AF patients and our data are broadly confirmatory of the role of age, diabetes mellitus and CHF in predicting the presence of CKD in AF patients (Roldán et al., 2013). Indeed, both increasing age and diabetes mellitus are major predictors of CKD in the general population (Fox, 2004). Conversely, hypertension (an important risk factor for CKD in general population (Fox, 2004)) had no significant influence on CKD amongst AF patients in our trial cohort. CKD is predictive of stroke in AF patients, whilst oral anticoagulation with VKA lowers stroke risk albeit at a higher risk of bleeding (Hart et al., 2011). The Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation Project showed that CKD, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, was associated with a higher incidence of ischemic stroke/thromboembolism events, but multivariable Cox regression analysis did not demonstrate an independent effect of renal impairment on predicting major adverse events, after adjusting for CHA2DS2-VASc score risk factors (Banerjee et al., 2014, Banerjee et al., 2013). Our results demonstrate that even in AF patients treated with warfarin, CKD was still associated with a higher incidence of stroke, independent of other concomitant risk factors. These data support previous findings from another prospective randomised trial, where the presence of a CrCl < 60 ml/min was associated with two-fold higher risk of stroke compared with those with CrCl ≥ 60 ml/min (Apostolakis et al., 2013). Importantly, we show that the predictive ability of CKD in identifying patients with a greater risk of stroke was independent of anticoagulation control, as reflected by the TTR, notwithstanding the latter being a strong predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with AF (White et al., 2007). The lack of significant association between CrCl when analysed as a continuous variable, and the risk of stroke could be attributed to more complex and multifactorial physiological alterations present in patients with established CKD that statistical adjustments would not be able to fully adjust for. Indeed, the risk of cardiovascular disease is non-linear in the transition from one functional CKD class to another, but increases exponentially with greater impairment of renal function (Schiffrin et al., 2007). Our study also supports previous evidence showing that CKD is associated with a higher risk for major bleeding (Apostolakis et al., 2013, Banerjee et al., 2014), even when stratified according to VKA treatment (Banerjee et al., 2014). Nonetheless, major bleeding is strongly related to the quality of anticoagulation control, and supra-therapeutic INR values amongst CKD patients are associated with a higher risk of developing a major bleed especially with progressive renal impairment (Limdi et al., 2015). In contrast to other previous studies (Olesen et al., 2012), we failed to show a significant association with MI risk, but given the low number of MIs recorded, this lack of association could partially be due to an inadequate sample size, and being unpowered. Finally, we found that CKD was an independent predictor for a higher risk of all cause death, consistent with prior studies (Apostolakis et al., 2013, Banerjee et al., 2014, Olesen et al., 2012). Importantly, the high risk for death in our study was independently related to CKD and inversely to effective anticoagulation (TTR > 70%). Our data strengthen and reinforce the relationship between renal function and TTR (Kleinow et al., 2011, Kooiman et al., 2014). One study derived from a cohort of anticoagulated AF patients found that patients with moderate and severe CKD had higher TTR than patients with normal renal function, although CKD patients spent more time above therapeutic range and INR-variability significantly increased in patients with moderate and severe CKD (Kooiman et al., 2014). Recently, an analysis from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) registry found that an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 was significantly associated with a reduced TTR (≤ 53%) (Pokorney et al., 2015). Our results strongly reinforce this relationship between renal function and anticoagulation control, and that CKD patients derived benefit from VKA treatment with good TTRs (Bonde et al., 2014). Good quality anticoagulation control (TTR > 70%) was an independent predictor for a lower risk of stroke, death and major bleeding. There was a significant inverse correlation between TTR and HR risk function for stroke, death and major bleeding overall, but when this analysis was repeated in the CKD subgroup, the degree of correlation was reduced for stroke and death risk, perhaps reflecting how CKD modulates the risk of adverse events.

Limitations

Renal function data was only available based on the Cockroft-Gault formula and not by more recent and validated methods of eGFR evaluation (Levey et al., 2015). The original trial protocol excluded patients with a severe CKD, and this may have led to an underestimate in the prevalence of CKD in AF population. Also, the absence of subjects with severe CKD precluded a more detailed analysis of the wider spectrum of renal function and its influence on TTR and clinical outcomes. Moreover, other parameters used to evaluate anticoagulation control (e.g. time spent below or above the target, proportion of INRs in range, etc.) were not available for this analysis. Since the original trials were run between 2000 and 2002, current clinical practice in managing AF patients could have changed, with possible implications for the generalizability of our results. However, VKAs are still very widely used worldwide for thromboprophylaxis, in particular for treating AF patients with CKD (Potpara et al., 2015). Thus, the association between CKD and TTR remains relevant during the decision-making process to prescribe the right drug for the right patient (Shields and Lip, 2015). Finally, the association of CKD with paroxysmal AF could be spurious, since only a low proportion of these subjects were enrolled in the original trial cohort. In conclusion, CKD is highly prevalent amongst AF patients and associated with several clinical comorbidities. Importantly, CKD in AF patients is an independent risk factor for stroke and death, but not major bleeding after adjustment for TTR. Even after adjusting for CKD, good quality anticoagulation control (TTR > 70%) was an independent predictor for a lower risk of stroke, death and major bleeding.

Author Contributions

MP and GYHL conceived the study, analysed data, interpreted results and drafted the manuscript. DAL provided critical revision of the manuscript.

Funding

None directly related to this manuscript.

Disclosures

GYHL: Chairman, Scientific Documents Committee, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Reviewer for various guidelines and position statements from ESC, EHRA, NICE etc. Steering Committees/trials: Includes steering committees for various Phase II and III studies, Health Economics & Outcomes Research, etc. Investigator in various clinical trials in cardiovascular disease, including those on antithrombotic therapies in atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndrome, lipids, etc. Consultant for Bayer/Janssen, Astellas, Merck, Sanofi, BMS/Pfizer, Biotronik, Medtronic, Portola, Boehringer Ingelheim, Microlife and Daiichi-Sankyo. Speaker for Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, Microlife, Roche and Daiichi-Sankyo. DAL: Investigator-initiated educational grants from Bayer Healthcare and Boehringer Ingelheim. Speaker's bureau for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb and Bayer for lectures at educational meetings. Dr Lane is also on the Steering Committee of a Phase IV clinical trial sponsored by Bristol-Myers-Squibb.
  32 in total

1.  K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 2.  Choosing the right drug to fit the patient when selecting oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A M Shields; G Y H Lip
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Effect of chronic kidney disease on warfarin management in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic.

Authors:  Megan E Kleinow; Candice L Garwood; Jennifer L Clemente; Peter Whittaker
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2011-09

4.  Patients' time in therapeutic range on warfarin among US patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from ORBIT-AF registry.

Authors:  Sean D Pokorney; DaJuanicia N Simon; Laine Thomas; Gregg C Fonarow; Peter R Kowey; Paul Chang; Daniel E Singer; Jack Ansell; Rosalia G Blanco; Bernard Gersh; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Elaine M Hylek; Alan S Go; Jonathan P Piccini; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Ximelagatran vs warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Gregory W Albers; Hans-Christoph Diener; Lars Frison; Margaretha Grind; Mark Nevinson; Stephen Partridge; Jonathan L Halperin; Jay Horrow; S Bertil Olsson; Palle Petersen; Alec Vahanian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range.

Authors:  Stuart J Connolly; Janice Pogue; John Eikelboom; Gregory Flaker; Patrick Commerford; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Jeffrey S Healey; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Predictors of new-onset kidney disease in a community-based population.

Authors:  Caroline S Fox; Martin G Larson; Eric P Leip; Bruce Culleton; Peter W F Wilson; Daniel Levy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Renal impairment in a "real-life" cohort of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (implications for thromboembolism and bleeding).

Authors:  Vanessa Roldán; Francisco Marín; Hermógenes Fernández; Sergio Manzano-Fernández; Pilar Gallego; Mariano Valdés; Vicente Vicente; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  F R Rosendaal; S C Cannegieter; F J van der Meer; E Briët
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  Efficacy and safety of vitamin K-antagonists (VKA) for atrial fibrillation in non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Judith Kooiman; Nienke van Rein; Bas Spaans; Koen A J van Beers; Jonna R Bank; Wilke R van de Peppel; Antonio Iglesias del Sol; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Ton J Rabelink; Gregory Y H Lip; Frederikus A Klok; Menno V Huisman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction.

Authors:  Tatjana S Potpara; Charles J Ferro; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease conundrum: an update.

Authors:  Laura Tapoi; Carina Ureche; Radu Sascau; Silvia Badarau; Adrian Covic
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Efficacy and safety of warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and CKD G3-G5D.

Authors:  Frida Welander; Henrik Renlund; Emöke Dimény; Henrik Holmberg; Anders Själander
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2022-01-28

4.  Synergic impact of oral anticoagulation control and renal function in determining major adverse events in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the AFCAS registry.

Authors:  Marco Proietti; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Andrea Rubboli; Axel Schlitt; Tuomas Kiviniemi; Pasi P Karjalainen; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Clinical outcomes associated with kidney function changes in anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients: An ancillary analysis from the BOREALIS trial.

Authors:  Ying Bai; Alena Shantsila; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-02-06

6.  Clinical complexity and impact of the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the ESC-EHRA EURObservational Research Programme in AF General Long-Term Registry.

Authors:  Giulio Francesco Romiti; Marco Proietti; Giuseppe Boriani; Gregory Y H Lip; Marco Vitolo; Niccolò Bonini; Ameenathul Mazaya Fawzy; Wern Yew Ding; Laurent Fauchier; Francisco Marin; Michael Nabauer; Gheorghe Andrei Dan; Tatjana S Potpara
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 11.150

7.  Oral Anticoagulants and Renal Impairment: The Convoluting Dilemma.

Authors:  Victor Serebruany
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 8.143

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.