| Literature DB >> 27428070 |
Abstract
Cynopoecilines comprise a diversified clade of small killifishes occurring in the Atlantic Forest, one of the most endangered biodiversity hotspots in the world. They are found in temporary pools of savannah-like and dense forest habitats, and most of them are highly threatened with extinction if not already extinct. The greatest gap in our knowledge of cynopoecilines stems from the absence of an integrative approach incorporating molecular phylogenetic data of species still found in their habitats with phylogenetic data taken from the rare and possibly extinct species without accessible molecular information. An integrative analysis combining 115 morphological characters with a multigene dataset of 2,108 bp comprising three nuclear loci (GLYT1, ENC1, Rho), provided a robust phylogeny of cynopoeciline killifishes, which was herein used to attain an accurate phylogenetic placement of nearly extinct species. The analysis indicates that the most recent common ancestor of the Cynopoecilini lived in open vegetation habitats of the Atlantic Forest of eastern Brazil and was a miniature species, reaching between 25 and 28 mm of standard length. The rare cases of cynopoecilines specialized in inhabiting pools within dense forests are interpreted as derived from four independent evolutionary events. Shifts in habitat usage and biogeographic patterns are tentatively associated to Cenozoic paleogeographic events, but the evolutionary history of cynopoecilines may be partially lost by a combination of poor past sampling and recent habitat decline. A sharp evolutionary shift directed to increased body size in a clade encompassing the genera Campellolebias and Cynopoecilus may be related to a parallel acquisition of an internally-fertilizing reproductive strategy, unique among aplocheiloid killifishes. This study reinforces the importance of adding morphological information to molecular databases as a tool to understand the biological complexity of organisms under intense pressure from loss of habitat.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27428070 PMCID: PMC4948875 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of locations and respective habitats of cynopoecilines.
| Species | Location | Habitat |
|---|---|---|
| 28°46’43”S 49°19’36”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 28°45’45”S 49°17’32”W | canal in open vegetation | |
| 27°39’56”S 48°33’18”W | pool at forest border | |
| 26°23’00”S 48°40’00”W | pool at forest border | |
| 26°24’46”S 48°38’23”W | pool at forest border | |
| 26°24’33”S 48°38’31”W | pool at forest border | |
| 24°40’00”S 47°26’04”W | pool at forest border | |
| about 24°20’S 47°35’W | pool among shrubs | |
| 28°55’51”S 49°30’53”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 28°30’26”S 48°48’01”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 31°58’01”S 51°59’48”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 31°49’19”S 51°41’21”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 31°15’52”S 51°02’40”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 30°50’59”S 50°41’21”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 30°09’37”S 50°13’26”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 30°09’09”S 50°14’25”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 29°59’20”S 50°11’33”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 29°57’34”S 50°13’53”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 29°56’33”S 53°42’24”W | swamp at gallery forest border | |
| 32°04’33”S 52°15’54”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 32°04’15”S 52°15’51”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 32°07’40”S 52°11’03”W | pool among shrubs | |
| 32°06’01”S 52°09’55”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 31°46’54”S 52°13’45”W | cattail swamp | |
| 31°54’26”S 52°18’58”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 32°31’47”S 52°32’31”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 32°44’16”S 52°38’32”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 32°44’40”S 52°38’41”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 31°06’56”S 52°01’41”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 30°55’17”S 51°54’01”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 31°04’41”S 52°02’18”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 30°03’27”S 51°46’33”W | pool at forest border | |
| 29°56’20”S 51°46’00”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 29°49’21”S 51°21’09”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 29°40’13”S 51°25’32”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 30°05’48”S 50°51’06”W | channels within dense semi-deciduous forest | |
| 25°42’16”S 48°34’27”W | channels within dense rain forest | |
| 25°40’42”S 48°30’13”W | channels within dense rain forest | |
| 25°30’32”S 48°21’54”W | channels within dense rain forest | |
| 25°04’25”S 47°55’27”W | channels within dense rain forest | |
| 24°43’24”S 47°34’43”W | channels within dense rain forest | |
| 22°57’57”S 42°53’33”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 22°58’04”S 42°57’31”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 24°13’09”S 46°55’25”W | channels within dense rain forest | |
| 22°39’30”S 43°25’46”W | channels within dense rain forest | |
| 22°38’09”S 43°15’57”W | channels within dense rain forest | |
| 22°38’24”S 43°16’31”W | cattail swamp at border of forest | |
| 22°39’55”S 43°26’24”W | cattail swamp | |
| 22°51’06”S 43°26’16”W | pool among shrubs | |
| 22°38’09”S 43°15’57”W | channels within dense rain forest | |
| 22°34’43”S 43°01’30”W | channels within dense rain forest | |
| 18°06’05”S 39°39’47”W | pool within dense Tabuleiro forest | |
| 22°33’50”S 41°58’56”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 22°34’34”S 41°59’10”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 22°55’21”S 42°55’42”W | cattail swamp | |
| 22°54’26”S 42°49’20”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 22°58’04”S 42°57’31”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 22°59’50”S 43°22’17”W | pool at Restinga forest border | |
| 22°43’28”S 43°42’12”W | cattail swamp | |
| 22°57’00”S 43°36’45”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 22°58’43”S 43°36’39”W | cattail swamp | |
| 22°51’53”S 42°33’15”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 22°51’19”S 42°34’10”W | pool in open vegetation | |
| 22°56’16”S 42°40’23”W | pool in open vegetation |
Fig 1Phylogenetic relationships among 13 taxa of the Cynopoecilini and four out-group taxa.
Single most parsimonious tree from the combined analysis of 115 morphological characters and a molecular data set, total of 2,108 bp, comprising segments of the nuclear genes GLYT1, ENC1, Rho. Numbers above branches are posterior probabilities of the Bayesian analysis higher than 95% (above) and bootstrap percentages of the maximum parsimony analysis higher than 50% (below), for the combined analysis; below branches, are bootstrap percentages higher than 50% for the analysis of morphological data alone. Photographs of male specimens were taken between five and 24 hours after field collection; unpaired fins are often damaged as a result of the strong aggressive behaviour occurring in cynopoeciline males.
Fig 2Evolution of habitat usage and body size in cynopoeciline killifishes.
(A) Evolution of habitat usage, including open, savannah-like vegetation and dense forest, and (B) biogeographic reconstruction based on four areas of endemism for cynopoecilines, inferred from the Bayesian model for ancestral area reconstruction implemented in RASP 3.02, using the model F8l with gamma distribution, and maximum number of ancestral areas = 1 and 2, respectively; photographs above represent a typical costal open vegetation habitat and a dense rain forest habitat, and map illustrates geographic limits of areas of endemism. (C) Reconstruction of ancestral maximum standard length (values above branches), measured between snout and caudal-fin base (see also fish photographs in Fig 1 to see relative body size among different cynopoeciline lineages); numbers just before a species name refer to the maximum recorded standard length for that species.