Literature DB >> 27427503

The Effect of Introducing a Minimum Price on the Distribution of Alcohol Purchase: A Counterfactual Analysis.

Anurag Sharma1, Fabrice Etilé2, Kompal Sinha1.   

Abstract

We use counterfactual analysis techniques to evaluate the impact of a $2 minimum unit price (MUP) on the distribution of Australian (Victorian) household off-trade alcohol purchases. Our estimates suggest that a $2 MUP significantly reduces the purchases of at-risk households by up to -0.92 [90% CI: -1.55, -0.28] standard drinks at the highest quantiles and has substantially less effect on households purchasing at light and moderate levels. A $2 MUP may reduce the proportions of male and female shoppers purchasing at the public health threshold of more than two standard drinks per household member per day by -3.03 [90% CI: -4.83, -1.22] percentage points (relative variation: -17%); and -1.85 [90% CI: -2.60, -1.10] percentage points (relative variation:-22%), respectively. Implementing an MUP on alcohol thus promises significant positive impacts on public health.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alcohol; counterfactual distribution; decomposition; minimum unit price

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27427503     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  2 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for the effectiveness of minimum pricing of alcohol: a systematic review and assessment using the Bradford Hill criteria for causality.

Authors:  Sadie Boniface; Jack W Scannell; Sally Marlow
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data.

Authors:  Anurag Sharma; Brian Vandenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.