Literature DB >> 27427379

Complex relationship of obesity and obesity paradox in heart failure - higher risk of developing heart failure and better outcomes in established heart failure.

Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan1, Maciej Banach2, Ali Ahmed3, Wilbert S Aronow4.   

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) and obesity are major public health problems. Studies have shown that obesity may increase the risk of developing new HF but after patients have developed HF, obesity may be associated with improved outcomes. This paradoxical association of obesity with HF remains poorly understood. It is believed that the obesity paradox may in part be due to the inherent limitations of body mass index (BMI) as a measure of obesity. BMI may not appropriately measure important components of body mass like body fat, fat distribution, lean body mass, and body fluid content and may not be ideal for examining the relationship of body composition with health outcomes. Differentiating between body fat and lean body mass may explain some of the paradoxical association between higher BMI and better prognosis in patients with HF. Paradoxical outcomes in HF may also be due to phenotypes of obesity. Future studies need to develop and test metrics that may better measure body composition and may serve as a better tool for the estimation of the true association of obesity and outcomes in HF and determine whether the association may vary by obesity phenotypes. KEY MESSAGES Obesity predisposes to heart failure in all age groups. But obesity in heart failure is an area of controversy, because of obesity paradox, the apparent protective effect of overweight and mild obesity on mortality after development of heart failure. Traditional markers of obesity do not measure different components of body weight like muscle mass, fat, water, and skeletal weight. Body Mass Index in heart failure subjects does not measure accurately body fat or fluid retention. So new markers of obesity like visceral adiposity index, body composition analysis, sarcopenic status assessment may be helpful in the assessment of heart failure outcomes. Different phenotypes of obesity may be responsible for the different morbidity, mortality as well as therapeutic outcomes in heart failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart failure; mortality; obesity; obesity paradox; obesity phenotypes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27427379     DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1197415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med        ISSN: 0785-3890            Impact factor:   4.709


  11 in total

1.  'The obesity paradox': a reconsideration of obesity and the risk of preterm birth.

Authors:  A Tsur; J A Mayo; R J Wong; G M Shaw; D K Stevenson; J B Gould
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Obesity, Blood Pressure, and Intraocular Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italian Children.

Authors:  Claudia Pileggi; Rosa Papadopoli; Caterina De Sarro; Carmelo Giuseppe Angelo Nobile; Maria Pavia
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.942

3.  Non-linear Associations Between Visceral Adiposity Index and Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases: Results From the NHANES (1999-2018).

Authors:  Yangchang Zhang; Qiang He; Weihao Zhang; Yang Xiong; Shisi Shen; Jialu Yang; Mengliang Ye
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-24

4.  The Relationship Between Body Mass Index and In-hospital Survival in Patients Admitted With Acute Heart Failure.

Authors:  Gabby Elbaz-Greener; Guy Rozen; Shemy Carasso; Merav Yarkoni; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Ronny Alcalai; Israel Gotsman; Eldad Rahamim; David Planer; Offer Amir
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in the general population: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhaohua Geng; Lan Huang; Mingbao Song; Yaoming Song
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Association of serum total cholesterol and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with heart failure caused by coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Zirui Hao; Chun Xiao; Ling Liu; Huocheng Liao
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Novel biochemical predictors of unfavorable prognosis for stable coronary disease.

Authors:  Andrzej Cacko; Agnieszka Kondracka; Monika Gawałko; Renata Główczyńska; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Zbigniew Bartoszewicz; Grzegorz Opolski; Marcin Grabowski
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Association of Body Mass Index With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From the FANTASIIA Registry.

Authors:  Vicente Bertomeu-Gonzalez; José Moreno-Arribas; María Asunción Esteve-Pastor; Inmaculada Roldán-Rabadán; Javier Muñiz; Paula Raña-Míguez; Martín Ruiz-Ortiz; Ángel Cequier; Vicente Bertomeu-Martínez; Lina Badimón; Manuel Anguita; Gregory Y H Lip; Francisco Marín
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Prognostic Impact of Statin Intensity in Heart Failure Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report From the CHART-2 (Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku District 2) Study.

Authors:  Takuya Oikawa; Yasuhiko Sakata; Kotaro Nochioka; Masanobu Miura; Kanako Tsuji; Takeo Onose; Ruri Abe; Shintaro Kasahara; Masayuki Sato; Takashi Shiroto; Jun Takahashi; Satoshi Miyata; Hiroaki Shimokawa
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Weight Loss Strategies in the Elderly: A Clinical Conundrum.

Authors:  Robert H Coker; Robert R Wolfe
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.