Literature DB >> 27427265

Biogeochemical controls on methylmercury in soils and sediments: Implications for site management.

Gary N Bigham1, Karen J Murray2, Yoko Masue-Slowey3, Elizabeth A Henry4.   

Abstract

Management of Hg-contaminated sites poses particular challenges because methylmercury (MeHg), a potent bio-accumulative neurotoxin, is formed in the environment, and concentrations are not generally predictable based solely on total Hg (THg) concentrations. In this review, we examine the state of knowledge regarding the chemical, biological, and physical controls on MeHg production and identify those most critical for contaminated site assessment and management. We provide a list of parameters to assess Hg-contaminated soils and sediments with regard to their potential to be a source of MeHg to biota and therefore a risk to humans and ecological receptors. Because some measurable geochemical parameters (e.g., DOC) can have opposing effects on Hg methylation, we recommend focusing first on factors that describe the potential for Hg bio-accumulation: site characteristics, Hg and MeHg concentrations, Hg availability, and microbial activity, where practical. At some sites, more detailed assessment of biogeochemistry may be required to develop a conceptual site model for remedial decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:249-263.
© 2016 SETAC. © 2016 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contaminated; Mercury; Methylmercury; Sediment; Site assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27427265     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  8 in total

1.  Mobility of mercury in soil and its transport into the sea.

Authors:  Karolina Gębka; Dominika Saniewska; Magdalena Bełdowska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Mercury horizontal spatial distribution in paddy field and accumulation of mercury in rice as well as their influencing factors in a typical mining area of Tongren City, Guizhou, China.

Authors:  Jingjing Du; Fang Liu; Ling Zhao; Chong Liu; Zhaocong Fu; Ying Teng
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-07-17

3.  Development of a Novel Equilibrium Passive Sampling Device for Methylmercury in Sediment and Soil Porewaters.

Authors:  James P Sanders; Alyssa McBurney; Cynthia C Gilmour; Grace E Schwartz; Spencer Washburn; Susan B Kane Driscoll; Steven S Brown; Upal Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.218

4.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 5.  Biotic formation of methylmercury: A bio-physico-chemical conundrum.

Authors:  Andrea G Bravo; Claudia Cosio
Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.745

6.  Methylmercury in Industrial Harbor Sediments in Taiwan: First Observations on its Occurrence, Distribution, and Measurement.

Authors:  Chih-Feng Chen; Yun-Ru Ju; Guan-Ting Lin; Chiu-Wen Chen; Cheng-Di Dong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Mercury methylating microbial communities of boreal forest soils.

Authors:  Jingying Xu; Moritz Buck; Karin Eklöf; Omneya O Ahmed; Jeffra K Schaefer; Kevin Bishop; Ulf Skyllberg; Erik Björn; Stefan Bertilsson; Andrea G Bravo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Plankton population dynamics and methylmercury bioaccumulation in the pelagic food web of mine-impacted surface water reservoirs.

Authors:  Mark Seelos; Marc Beutel; Stephen McCord; Sora Kim; Katie Vigil
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.