Literature DB >> 27427180

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Voice-Related Quality of Life Measure.

Zahide Çiler Tezcaner1, Songül Aksoy2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) questionnaire. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a nonrandomized, prospective study with control group.
METHODS: The questionnaire was administered to 249 individuals-130 with vocal complaint and 119 without-with a mean age of 37.8 ± 12.3 years. The Turkish version of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and perceptual voice evaluation measures were also administered at 2-14 days for retest reliability. The instrument was submitted to validity and reliability evaluation.
RESULTS: The V-RQOL measure showed a strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability; the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the overall V-RQOL was 0.969, the physical functioning domain was 0.949, and the social-emotional domain was 0.940. In the test-retest reliability test, the overall V-RQOL was found to be 0.989. The construct validity of the V-RQOL was determined based on the strength and direction of its relation to the VHI and the perceptual voice evaluation measure. The higher the VHI level, the lower the physical functioning, social-emotional, and overall score levels of the V-RQOL (r = -0.927, r = -0.912, r = -0.944, respectively; P < 0.001). Following the perceptual voice self-assessment, a statistically significant difference was found between the V-RQOL scores of individuals who defined their voices as good, very good, and perfect, and those who defined their voices as bad and very bad (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the Turkish version of the V-RQOL measure has reliability and validity and may play a crucial role in evaluating Turkish-speaking patients with voice disorders.
Copyright © 2017 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  quality of life; reliability; validity; voice; voice disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27427180     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  5 in total

1.  Vocal outcomes after COVID-19 infection: acoustic voice analyses, durational measurements, self-reported findings, and auditory-perceptual evaluations.

Authors:  Hakan Gölaç; Güzide Atalık; Esra Özcebe; Bülent Gündüz; Recep Karamert; Yusuf Kemal Kemaloğlu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.236

2.  Evaluation of the Correlation Between Turkish Voice Handicap Index-10 and Turkish Voice-Related Quality of Life Scale.

Authors:  Berna Deniz Kuntman; Mustafa Şahin; Mehmet Fatih Öğüt
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-01

3.  Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index

Authors:  Seher Şirin; Mehmet Fatih Öğüt; Cem Bilgen
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 0.973

4.  The Voice-Related Quality Of Life: A Study on the Reliability and Validity of the Tamil Version.

Authors:  Akshaya Rangarajan; Jasmine Lydia Selvaraj; Divya Perumal Santhanam
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2019-03-07

5.  Development of a Diagnostic Questionnaire for Damp Phlegm Pattern and Blood Stasis Pattern in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (CHD-DPBSPQ).

Authors:  Ge Fang; Ling-Lin Zhang; Qi Ren; Xiao-Wen Zhou; Bin Wang; Xuan Zhou; Xiao-Qi Liu; Dan-Hong Peng; Xin-Lin Chen; Xian-Tao Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.629

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.