Literature DB >> 27426229

Contrasting effects of summer and winter warming on body mass explain population dynamics in a food-limited Arctic herbivore.

Steve D Albon1, R Justin Irvine1, Odd Halvorsen2, Rolf Langvatn3,4, Leif E Loe5, Erik Ropstad6, Vebjørn Veiberg4, René van der Wal7, Eirin M Bjørkvoll8, Elizabeth I Duff9, Brage B Hansen8, Aline M Lee8, Torkild Tveraa10, Audun Stien10.   

Abstract

The cumulative effects of climate warming on herbivore vital rates and population dynamics are hard to predict, given that the expected effects differ between seasons. In the Arctic, warmer summers enhance plant growth which should lead to heavier and more fertile individuals in the autumn. Conversely, warm spells in winter with rainfall (rain-on-snow) can cause 'icing', restricting access to forage, resulting in starvation, lower survival and fecundity. As body condition is a 'barometer' of energy demands relative to energy intake, we explored the causes and consequences of variation in body mass of wild female Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) from 1994 to 2015, a period of marked climate warming. Late winter (April) body mass explained 88% of the between-year variation in population growth rate, because it strongly influenced reproductive loss, and hence subsequent fecundity (92%), as well as survival (94%) and recruitment (93%). Autumn (October) body mass affected ovulation rates but did not affect fecundity. April body mass showed no long-term trend (coefficient of variation, CV = 8.8%) and was higher following warm autumn (October) weather, reflecting delays in winter onset, but most strongly, and negatively, related to 'rain-on-snow' events. October body mass (CV = 2.5%) increased over the study due to higher plant productivity in the increasingly warm summers. Density-dependent mass change suggested competition for resources in both winter and summer but was less pronounced in recent years, despite an increasing population size. While continued climate warming is expected to increase the carrying capacity of the high Arctic tundra, it is also likely to cause more frequent icing events. Our analyses suggest that these contrasting effects may cause larger seasonal fluctuations in body mass and vital rates. Overall our findings provide an important 'missing' mechanistic link in the current understanding of the population biology of a keystone species in a rapidly warming Arctic.
© 2016 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Rangiferzzm321990; Svalbard; climate change; density dependence; extreme events; icing; nutrition; primary production; reindeer; weather

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27426229     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  16 in total

1.  Antler growth as a cost of reproduction in female reindeer.

Authors:  Leif Egil Loe; Gabriel Pigeon; Steve D Albon; Pernille E Giske; R Justin Irvine; Erik Ropstad; Audun Stien; Vebjørn Veiberg; Atle Mysterud
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The influence of weather conditions during gestation on life histories in a wild Arctic ungulate.

Authors:  Mathieu Douhard; Leif Egil Loe; Audun Stien; Christophe Bonenfant; R Justin Irvine; Vebjørn Veiberg; Erik Ropstad; Steve Albon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Response of reindeer mating time to climatic variability.

Authors:  Amélie Paoli; Robert B Weladji; Øystein Holand; Jouko Kumpula
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.964

4.  Circadian rhythmicity persists through the Polar night and midnight sun in Svalbard reindeer.

Authors:  Walter Arnold; Thomas Ruf; Leif Egil Loe; R Justin Irvine; Erik Ropstad; Vebjørn Veiberg; Steve D Albon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Size does matter: Parallel evolution of adaptive thermal tolerance and body size facilitates adaptation to climate change in domestic cattle.

Authors:  Muhammed Elayadeth-Meethal; Aravindakshan Thazhathu Veettil; Shane K Maloney; Nichola Hawkins; Tom H Misselbrook; Veerasamy Sejian; M Jordana Rivero; Michael R F Lee
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Cohort antler size signals environmental stress in a moderate climate.

Authors:  Bronson K Strickland; P Grady Dixon; Phillip D Jones; Stephen Demarais; Nathan O Owen; David A Cox; Katie Landry-Guyton; W Mark Baldwin; William T McKinley
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.787

7.  Determinants of heart rate in Svalbard reindeer reveal mechanisms of seasonal energy management.

Authors:  L Monica Trondrud; Gabriel Pigeon; Steve Albon; Walter Arnold; Alina L Evans; R Justin Irvine; Elżbieta Król; Erik Ropstad; Audun Stien; Vebjørn Veiberg; John R Speakman; Leif Egil Loe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Bison body size and climate change.

Authors:  Jeff M Martin; Jim I Mead; Perry S Barboza
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Body condition and adrenal glucocorticoid activity affects metabolic marker and lipid profiles in captive female elephants in Thailand.

Authors:  Treepradab Norkaew; Janine L Brown; Pakkanut Bansiddhi; Chaleamchat Somgird; Chatchote Thitaram; Veerasak Punyapornwithaya; Khanittha Punturee; Preeyanat Vongchan; Nopphamas Somboon; Jaruwan Khonmee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of climate change in lizards of the genus Xenosaurus (Xenosauridae) based on projected changes in climatic suitability and climatic niche conservatism.

Authors:  Christian Berriozabal-Islas; João Fabrício Mota Rodrigues; Aurelio Ramírez-Bautista; Jorge L Becerra-López; Adrián Nieto-Montes de Oca
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.