Literature DB >> 27424524

Genetic variation in the major mitotic checkpoint genes associated with chromosomal aberrations in healthy humans.

Asta Försti1, Christoph Frank2, Bozena Smolkova3, Alena Kazimirova4, Magdalena Barancokova4, Veronika Vymetalkova5, Michal Kroupa6, Alessio Naccarati7, Ludmila Vodickova8, Janka Buchancova9, Maria Dusinska10, Ludovit Musak11, Pavel Vodicka5, Kari Hemminki12.   

Abstract

Non-specific chromosomal aberrations (CAs) are microscopically detected in about 1% of lymphocytes drawn from healthy persons. Causes of CAs in general population are not known but they may be related to risk of cancer. In view of the importance of the mitotic checkpoint machinery on maintaining chromosomal integrity we selected 9 variants in main checkpoint related genes (BUB1B, BUB3, MAD2L1, CENPF, ESPL1/separase, NEK2, PTTG1/securin, ZWILCH and ZWINT) for a genotyping study on samples from healthy individuals (N = 330 to 729) whose lymphocytes had an increased number of CAs compared to persons with a low number of CAs. Genetic variation in individual genes played a minor importance, consistent with the high conservation and selection pressure of the checkpoint system. However, gene pairs were significantly associated with CAs: PTTG1-ZWILCH and PTTG1-ZWINT. MAD2L1 and PTTG1 were the most common partners in any of the two-way interactions. The results suggest that interactions at the level of cohesin (PTTG1) and kinetochore function (ZWINT, ZWILCH and MAD2L1) contribute to the frequency of CAs, suggesting that gene variants at different checkpoint functions appeared to be required for the formation of CAs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal integrity; Cytogenetics; DNA double-stranded break; Spindle checkpoint

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27424524     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  4 in total

1.  Of mice, genes and aging.

Authors:  James DeGregori
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Oxidative Damage in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: Molecular Mapping of Base Excision Repair Glycosylases in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Pavel Vodicka; Marketa Urbanova; Pavol Makovicky; Kristyna Tomasova; Michal Kroupa; Rudolf Stetina; Alena Opattova; Klara Kostovcikova; Anna Siskova; Michaela Schneiderova; Veronika Vymetalkova; Ludmila Vodickova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Applications of Genome Editing Technology in Research on Chromosome Aneuploidy Disorders.

Authors:  Silvia Natsuko Akutsu; Kazumasa Fujita; Keita Tomioka; Tatsuo Miyamoto; Shinya Matsuura
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Identification of driver genes and key pathways of non-functional pituitary adenomas predicts the therapeutic effect of STO-609.

Authors:  Bo Wu; Shanshan Jiang; Xinhui Wang; Sheng Zhong; Yiming Bi; Dazhuang Yi; Ge Liu; Fangfei Hu; Gaojing Dou; Yong Chen; Yi Wu; Jiajun Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.