Literature DB >> 27424184

Chemoradiation of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck (LASCCHN): Is 20mg/m(2) cisplatin on five days every four weeks an alternative to 100mg/m(2) cisplatin every three weeks?

Dirk Rades1, Daniel Seidl2, Stefan Janssen3, Amira Bajrovic4, Samer G Hakim5, Barbara Wollenberg6, Katarina Karner7, Primoz Strojan7, Steven E Schild8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare chemoradiation with 100mg/m(2) cisplatin every three weeks to 20mg/m(2) on five days every four weeks for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck (LASCCHN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 230 patients receiving chemoradiation for LASCCHN, 100mg/m(2) cisplatin every three weeks (N=126) and 20mg/m(2) cisplatin on five days every four weeks (N=104) were retrospectively compared. Chemoradiation plus eleven characteristics (T-/N-classification, performance score, gender, age, tumor site, grading, surgery, radiation technique, pre-chemoradiation hemoglobin, cumulative cisplatin dose) were analyzed for locoregional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Chemoradiation groups were compared for adverse events.
RESULTS: On univariate analyses, chemoradiation had no impact on LRC (p=0.53), MFS (p=0.67) and OS (p=0.14). On multivariate analysis of LRC, T-classification (p=0.045) and hemoglobin (p<0.001) were significant. On multivariate analysis of MFS, performance score (p=0.028) was significant. On multivariate analysis of OS, performance score (p=0.009) and hemoglobin levels (p=0.002) achieved significance. Chemoradiation with 100mg/m(2) cisplatin was associated with more pneumonia/sepsis (p=0.003), grade ⩾2nausea/vomiting (p<0.001), grade ⩾2 nephrotoxicity (p=0.005), grade ⩾2 xerostomia (p=0.002), grade ⩾3 hematotoxicity (p=0.052) and grade ⩾2 ototoxicity (p=0.048). CONCLUDING STATEMENT: 20mg/m(2) cisplatin on five days every four weeks was associated with fewer adverse events than 100mg/m(2) cisplatin every three weeks. 100mg/m(2) cisplatin was not significantly superior to 20mg/m(2) cisplatin regarding LRC, MFS and OS. Given the limitations of a retrospective study, 20mg/m(2) cisplatin appeared preferable. The results should be confirmed in a randomized trial.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Chemoradiation; Higher-dose cisplatin; LASCCHN; Lower-dose fractionated cisplatin; Treatment outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27424184     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  3 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury After the First Course of Cisplatin.

Authors:  Shveta S Motwani; Gearoid M McMahon; Benjamin D Humphreys; Ann H Partridge; Sushrut S Waikar; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  The Cisplatin Total Dose and Concomitant Radiation in Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Any Recent Evidence for Dose Efficacy?

Authors:  Lindsay Carlsson; Scott V Bratman; Lillian L Siu; Anna Spreafico
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-07

3.  The characteristics and risk factors for cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury in the elderly.

Authors:  Jie-Qiong Liu; Guang-Yan Cai; Si-Yang Wang; Yu-Huan Song; Yuan-Yuan Xia; Shuang Liang; Wen-Ling Wang; Sa-Sa Nie; Zhe Feng; Xiang-Mei Chen
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.423

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.