Literature DB >> 27423640

Videofluoroscopic evaluation of pharyngeal swallowing dysfunction after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection.

Yoshihiko Kumai1, Yasuhiro Samejima2, Masayuki Watanabe2, Eiji Yumoto3.   

Abstract

To determine the factors inducing aspiration following esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection (3FL) and the effect of the chin-down maneuver combined with supraglottic swallow (CDSS). Retrospective analysis of a consecutive case series. Videofluoroscopic (VF) evaluations of 25 patients who consulted with our out-patient clinic from 2006 to 2012 for swallowing dysfunction following esophagectomy with 3FL without tracheostomy were reviewed. The penetration aspiration scale (PAS) was used for evaluation. The assessment parameters of VF examination were set as follows: laryngeal elevation, peristaltic wave of the pharynx, upper esophageal sphincter opening, and bolus residue in the pyriform sinus and vallecula after swallowing. Associations of the degree of aspiration with these parameters and the effect of CDSS maneuver on PAS were statistically examined. Fourteen patients had swallowing dysfunction with PAS score (1-3). Disturbance of laryngeal elevation was significantly correlated with the degree of aspiration (p = 0.021). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that reduced laryngeal elevation significantly enhanced aspiration (p = 0.0026). Sixteen patients had already acquired compensated chin-down swallowing at the time of VF (Group I). Among the remaining nine patients (Group II), the PAS score was significantly (p < 0.05) improved after training in chin-down swallowing. The mean PAS score of the Group I patients was not significantly different from that of the Group II patients after the training in CDSS. Laryngeal aspiration following esophagectomy with 3FL is significantly correlated with reduced laryngeal elevation and can be ameliorated after training in CDSS. Level of evidence IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspiration; Chin down; Esophagectomy; Laryngeal elevation; Pharyngeal swallowing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27423640     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4209-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  15 in total

1.  Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in assessing aspiration after transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Steven B Leder; Sancar Bayar; Clarence T Sasaki; Ronald R Salem
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Evaluation of dysphagia and diminished airway protection after three-field esophagectomy and a remedy.

Authors:  Takushi Yasuda; Masahiko Yano; Hiroshi Miyata; Makoto Yamasaki; Shuji Takiguchi; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Videomanometric analysis of supraglottic swallow, effortful swallow, and chin tuck in patients with pharyngeal dysfunction.

Authors:  M Bülow; R Olsson; O Ekberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Postoperative pulmonary complications are associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes after extended esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shoichi Kinugasa; Mitsuo Tachibana; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Shuhei Ueda; Toshiyuki Fujii; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Takeru Nakamoto; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Effects of postural change on aspiration in head and neck surgical patients.

Authors:  J A Logemann; A W Rademaker; B R Pauloski; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Chin-down posture effect on aspiration in dysphagic patients.

Authors:  T K Shanahan; J A Logemann; A W Rademaker; B R Pauloski; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  H Akiyama; M Tsurumaru; H Udagawa; Y Kajiyama
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Respiratory complications after surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. A study of 309 patients according to the type of resection.

Authors:  P Dumont; J M Wihlm; J G Hentz; N Roeslin; R Lion; G Morand
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Selective three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  W-T Fang; W-H Chen; Y Chen; Y Jiang
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.429

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Past, present, and future of three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Harushi Udagawa
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-05-14

2.  Presentation of oropharyngeal dysphagia and rehabilitative intervention following esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Kaneoka; S Yang; H Inokuchi; R Ueha; H Yamashita; T Nito; Y Seto; N Haga
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  An Investigation of Factors Related to Food Intake Ability and Swallowing Difficulty After Surgery for Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Taichi Mafune; Shinya Mikami; Takehito Otsubo; Osamu Saji; Tsunehisa Matsushita; Takeharu Enomoto; Futaba Maki; Shinobu Tochimoto
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.438

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.