Literature DB >> 27423374

A sorrow shared is a sorrow halved? A three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing internet-based clinician-guided individual versus group treatment for social anxiety disorder.

Ava Schulz1, Timo Stolz2, Alessia Vincent3, Tobias Krieger4, Gerhard Andersson5, Thomas Berger6.   

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that internet-based cognitive behavioural treatments (ICBT) are effective to treat social anxiety disorder (SAD). Whereas the efficacy of clinician-guided ICBT has been established, ICBT in a group format has not yet been systematically investigated. This three-arm RCT compared the efficacy of clinician-guided group ICBT (GT) with clinician guided individual ICBT (IT) and a wait-list (WL). A total of 149 individuals meeting the diagnostic criteria for SAD were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Primary endpoints were self-report measures of SAD and diagnostic status taken at baseline, after the twelve-week intervention and at six-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints were symptoms of depression, interpersonal problems and general symptomatology. At post-treatment, both active conditions showed superior outcome regarding SAD symptoms (GT vs. WL: d = 0.84-0.74; IT vs. WL: d = 0.94-1.22). The two active conditions did not differ significantly in symptom reduction (d = 0.12-0.26, all ps > 0.63), diagnostic response rate or attrition. Treatment gains were maintained at follow-up. The group format reduced weekly therapist time per participant by 71% (IT: 17 min, GT: 5 min). Findings indicate that a clinician-guided group format is a promising approach in treating SAD.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Group therapy; Guided self-help; ICBT; Internet treatment; Peer support; RCT; Social anxiety disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27423374     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  8 in total

Review 1.  Digitally Delivered Psychological Interventions for Anxiety Disorders: a Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Evgenia Stefanopoulou; David Lewis; Matthew Taylor; James Broscombe; Jan Larkin
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2019-03

2.  Efficacy of an unguided internet-based self-help intervention for social anxiety disorder in university students: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fanny Kählke; Thomas Berger; Ava Schulz; Harald Baumeister; Matthias Berking; Randy P Auerbach; Ronny Bruffaerts; Pim Cuijpers; Ronald C Kessler; David Daniel Ebert
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-01-27       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Feasibility of a blended group treatment (bGT) for major depression: uncontrolled interventional study in a university setting.

Authors:  Raphael Schuster; Isabelle Fichtenbauer; Verena Maria Sparr; Thomas Berger; Anton-Rupert Laireiter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  To Each Stress Its Own Screen: A Cross-Sectional Survey of the Patterns of Stress and Various Screen Uses in Relation to Self-Admitted Screen Addiction.

Authors:  Najmeh Khalili-Mahani; Anna Smyrnova; Lisa Kakinami
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 5.  Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders in Open Community Versus Clinical Service Recruitment: Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Geke Romijn; Neeltje Batelaan; Robin Kok; Jeroen Koning; Anton van Balkom; Nickolai Titov; Heleen Riper
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Adherence Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Examining Manualized Multisession Online Interventions: Systematic Review of Practices and Proposal for Reporting Standards.

Authors:  Ina Beintner; Bianka Vollert; Anna-Carlotta Zarski; Felix Bolinski; Peter Musiat; Dennis Görlich; David Daniel Ebert; Corinna Jacobi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Optimizing cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder and understanding the mechanisms of change: Study protocol for a randomized factorial trial.

Authors:  Rodrigo C T Lopes; Dajana Šipka; Tobias Krieger; Jan Philipp Klein; Thomas Berger
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2021-11-10

Review 8.  Clarifying the Concept of Adherence to eHealth Technology: Systematic Review on When Usage Becomes Adherence.

Authors:  Floor Sieverink; Saskia M Kelders; Julia Ewc van Gemert-Pijnen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.