Literature DB >> 27423234

An Integrated Model of Breastfeeding Peer Counseling Support is Feasible and Associated with Improved Exclusive Breastfeeding.

Mary R Rozga1,2, Patricia A Benton3, Jean M Kerver4, Beth H Olson5.   

Abstract

Background Though in-person contacts in the home have demonstrated efficacy in improving breastfeeding outcomes in peer counseling programs, home contacts are resource-intensive. Objective To compare the feasibility and effectiveness of an Integrated Model of peer counseling breastfeeding support characterized by select home visits augmented with individual WIC clinic visits and group education, in contrast to the Standard Model which includes a standard number of in-person home contacts. Methods Six counties (n = 226 participants) and nine counties (n = 472 participants) were assigned to the Standard Model and the Integrated Model, respectively. Differences in demographic characteristics and breastfeeding outcomes were tested using Chi square tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results Participants in counties where the Integrated Model was implemented had fewer home contacts (p = 0.03) and were more likely to have a hospital (p = 0.03) or group education (p < 0.001) contact, whereas Standard Model participants were more likely to receive an individual WIC clinic contact (p < 0.001). While there was no difference in the hazard of discontinuing any breastfeeding between groups, participants in the Integrated Model group had a lower hazard of discontinuing exclusive breastfeeding by 3 months postpartum (p = 0.02). Among participants within the Integrated Model, group education classes were associated with higher hazard of discontinuation (p = 0.04 and p = 0.003 for any and exclusive breastfeeding, respectively). Conclusions It was feasible for peer counselors to implement changes in program delivery to achieve fewer home visits without a detrimental impact on breastfeeding outcomes. However, group education classes did not appear to be beneficial for improving breastfeeding outcomes in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breastfeeding; Home visits; Low income; Peer counseling; Prenatal education

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27423234     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-2086-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  12 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of peer support for breastfeeding continuation: metaregression analysis of the effect of setting, intensity, and timing.

Authors:  Kate Jolly; Lucy Ingram; Khalid S Khan; Jonathan J Deeks; Nick Freemantle; Christine MacArthur
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-25

2.  Self-reported reasons for breastfeeding cessation among low-income women enrolled in a peer counseling breastfeeding support program.

Authors:  Mary R Rozga; Jean M Kerver; Beth H Olson
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.219

Review 3.  Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Breastfeeding peer counseling: from efficacy through scale-up.

Authors:  Donna J Chapman; Katherine Morel; Alex Kojo Anderson; Grace Damio; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.219

Review 5.  Breastfeeding peer counselors in the United States: helping to build a culture and tradition of breastfeeding.

Authors:  Beverly Rossman
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Impact of peer counselling breast-feeding support programme protocols on any and exclusive breast-feeding discontinuation in low-income women.

Authors:  Mary R Rozga; Jean M Kerver; Beth H Olson
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  A quasi-experimental evaluation of a breastfeeding support program for low income women in Michigan.

Authors:  Beth H Olson; Steven J Haider; Lenisa Vangjel; Tracie A Bolton; Jonathan G Gold
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-12-11

Review 8.  Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Haroon; Jai K Das; Rehana A Salam; Aamer Imdad; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators.

Authors:  Ted Greiner
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.461

10.  Scaling-up exclusive breastfeeding support programmes: the example of KwaZulu-Natal.

Authors:  Chris Desmond; Ruth M Bland; Gerard Boyce; Hoosen M Coovadia; Anna Coutsoudis; Nigel Rollins; Marie-Louise Newell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prenatal Provider Breastfeeding Toolkit: Results of a Pilot to Increase Women's Prenatal Breastfeeding Support, Intentions, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Casey Rosen-Carole; Jill Halterman; Constance D Baldwin; Hayley Martin; Nicolas P N Goldstein; Katherine Allen; Maria Fagnano; Holly Widanka; Ann Dozier
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.219

2.  Periconception weight management in the Women, Infants, and Children program.

Authors:  L A Gilmore; M Augustyn; S M Gross; P M Vallo; D M Paige; L M Redman
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2019-01-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.