Literature DB >> 27422991

Effect of PEEP, blood volume, and inspiratory hold maneuvers on venous return.

David Berger1, Per W Moller2, Alberto Weber3, Andreas Bloch1, Stefan Bloechlinger4, Matthias Haenggi1, Soren Sondergaard5, Stephan M Jakob1, Sheldon Magder6, Jukka Takala7.   

Abstract

According to Guyton's model of circulation, mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP), right atrial pressure (RAP), and resistance to venous return (RVR) determine venous return. MSFP has been estimated from inspiratory hold-induced changes in RAP and blood flow. We studied the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and blood volume on venous return and MSFP in pigs. MSFP was measured by balloon occlusion of the right atrium (MSFPRAO), and the MSFP obtained via extrapolation of pressure-flow relationships with airway occlusion (MSFPinsp_hold) was extrapolated from RAP/pulmonary artery flow (QPA) relationships during inspiratory holds at PEEP 5 and 10 cmH2O, after bleeding, and in hypervolemia. MSFPRAO increased with PEEP [PEEP 5, 12.9 (SD 2.5) mmHg; PEEP 10, 14.0 (SD 2.6) mmHg, P = 0.002] without change in QPA [2.75 (SD 0.43) vs. 2.56 (SD 0.45) l/min, P = 0.094]. MSFPRAO decreased after bleeding and increased in hypervolemia [10.8 (SD 2.2) and 16.4 (SD 3.0) mmHg, respectively, P < 0.001], with parallel changes in QPA Neither PEEP nor volume state altered RVR (P = 0.489). MSFPinsp_hold overestimated MSFPRAO [16.5 (SD 5.8) vs. 13.6 (SD 3.2) mmHg, P = 0.001; mean difference 3.0 (SD 5.1) mmHg]. Inspiratory holds shifted the RAP/QPA relationship rightward in euvolemia because inferior vena cava flow (QIVC) recovered early after an inspiratory hold nadir. The QIVC nadir was lowest after bleeding [36% (SD 24%) of preinspiratory hold at 15 cmH2O inspiratory pressure], and the QIVC recovery was most complete at the lowest inspiratory pressures independent of volume state [range from 80% (SD 7%) after bleeding to 103% (SD 8%) at PEEP 10 cmH2O of QIVC before inspiratory hold]. The QIVC recovery thus defends venous return, possibly via hepatosplanchnic vascular waterfall.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood volume; cardiac output; mean systemic filling pressure; mechanical ventilation; positive end-expiratory pressure; right atrial pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27422991     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00931.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  17 in total

Review 1.  Value of measuring esophageal pressure to evaluate heart-lung interactions-applications for invasive hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Xavier Repessé; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Guillaume Geri
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

Review 2.  Determinants of systemic venous return and the impact of positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  David Berger; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

Review 3.  Venous return and the physical connection between distribution of segmental pressures and volumes.

Authors:  George L Brengelmann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Lung-borne systemic inflammation in mechanically ventilated infant rats due to high PEEP, oxygen, and hypocapnia.

Authors:  Philipp Baumann; Francesco Greco; Pietro L'Abate; Sven Wellmann; Susanne Wiegert; Vincenzo Cannizzaro
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  Heart-lung interactions during mechanical ventilation: the basics.

Authors:  Syed S Mahmood; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  Effect of norepinephrine challenge on cardiovascular determinants assessed using a mathematical model in septic shock: a physiological study.

Authors:  Huaiwu He; Siyi Yuan; Yun Long; Dawei Liu; Xiang Zhou; Can Ince
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

7.  Mechanical ventilation strategies alter cardiovascular biomarkers in an infant rat model.

Authors:  Philipp Baumann; Susanne Wiegert; Francesco Greco; Sven Wellmann; Pietro L'Abate; Vincenzo Cannizzaro
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-01

Review 8.  Renal failure in critically ill patients, beware of applying (central venous) pressure on the kidney.

Authors:  Xiukai Chen; Xiaoting Wang; Patrick M Honore; Herbert D Spapen; Dawei Liu
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 9.  Estimating mean circulatory filling pressure in clinical practice: a systematic review comparing three bedside methods in the critically ill.

Authors:  Marije Wijnberge; Daniko P Sindhunata; Michael R Pinsky; Alexander P Vlaar; Else Ouweneel; Jos R Jansen; Denise P Veelo; Bart F Geerts
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Effect of mechanical ventilation versus spontaneous breathing on abdominal edema and inflammation in ARDS: an experimental porcine model.

Authors:  Silvia Marchesi; Göran Hedenstierna; Aki Hata; Ricardo Feinstein; Anders Larsson; Anders Olof Larsson; Miklós Lipcsey
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.