Jonathan Chan1, Ismail Sari1, David Salonen1, Robert D Inman1, Nigil Haroon2. 1. From the Spondylitis Program, Toronto Western Hospital; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Department of Radiology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Rheumatology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.J. Chan, MD, FRCPC, Spondylitis Program, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Department of Rheumatology, University of British Columbia; I. Sari, MD, Spondylitis Program, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Department of Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine; D. Salonen, MD, FRCPC, Department of Radiology, Toronto Western Hospital; R.D. Inman, MD, FRCPC, FACP, Spondylitis Program, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; N. Haroon, MD, PhD, DM, Spondylitis Program, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto. 2. From the Spondylitis Program, Toronto Western Hospital; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Department of Radiology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Rheumatology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.J. Chan, MD, FRCPC, Spondylitis Program, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Department of Rheumatology, University of British Columbia; I. Sari, MD, Spondylitis Program, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Department of Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine; D. Salonen, MD, FRCPC, Department of Radiology, Toronto Western Hospital; R.D. Inman, MD, FRCPC, FACP, Spondylitis Program, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; N. Haroon, MD, PhD, DM, Spondylitis Program, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto. Nigil.Haroon@uhn.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a screening tool for the identification of sacroiliitis on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: Variables including erosions (number and size), sclerosis (depths of > 0.3 cm or > 0.5 cm), and ankylosis were identified through a training exercise involving 12 CT scans containing the sacroiliac joints. Two blinded readers read 24 CT scans from a derivation cohort to propose a screening tool for identifying discriminating features of sacroiliitis. A test cohort of 68 patients was used to confirm the utility of this tool. Inter- and intraobserver values, sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative likelihood ratios were calculated for individual as well as combinations of variables. Erosions were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Analysis of the derivation cohort determined that counting the number of erosions on the worst coronal slice in each of 4 articular surfaces was not inferior to analyzing each individual slice in either transverse or coronal view. In the test cohort, interreader reliability for ankylosis and iliac and sacral erosions was very good (κ = 1, ICC = 0.989 and 0.995, respectively) whereas for sclerosis, it was moderate (κ = 0.39-0.96). A total erosion score of ≥ 3 was found to have the highest sensitivity and specificity for sacroiliitis (91% for each). The addition of a > 0.5 cm of iliac sclerosis or a > 0.3 cm of sacral sclerosis marginally increased the sensitivity (94%) but decreased specificity (85%). CONCLUSION: The presence of ankylosis or a total erosion score of ≥ 3 on CT is sufficient for identifying patients at high risk of sacroiliitis and may prompt more timely referrals to a rheumatologist.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a screening tool for the identification of sacroiliitis on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: Variables including erosions (number and size), sclerosis (depths of > 0.3 cm or > 0.5 cm), and ankylosis were identified through a training exercise involving 12 CT scans containing the sacroiliac joints. Two blinded readers read 24 CT scans from a derivation cohort to propose a screening tool for identifying discriminating features of sacroiliitis. A test cohort of 68 patients was used to confirm the utility of this tool. Inter- and intraobserver values, sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative likelihood ratios were calculated for individual as well as combinations of variables. Erosions were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Analysis of the derivation cohort determined that counting the number of erosions on the worst coronal slice in each of 4 articular surfaces was not inferior to analyzing each individual slice in either transverse or coronal view. In the test cohort, interreader reliability for ankylosis and iliac and sacral erosions was very good (κ = 1, ICC = 0.989 and 0.995, respectively) whereas for sclerosis, it was moderate (κ = 0.39-0.96). A total erosion score of ≥ 3 was found to have the highest sensitivity and specificity for sacroiliitis (91% for each). The addition of a > 0.5 cm of iliac sclerosis or a > 0.3 cm of sacral sclerosis marginally increased the sensitivity (94%) but decreased specificity (85%). CONCLUSION: The presence of ankylosis or a total erosion score of ≥ 3 on CT is sufficient for identifying patients at high risk of sacroiliitis and may prompt more timely referrals to a rheumatologist.
Authors: You-Jung Ha; Hyo Jin Kim; Eugene Lee; Ji Hye Park; Young Soo Park; Yun Jong Lee; Yusuhn Kang; Hyuk Yoon Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 2.884