Literature DB >> 27422610

The modulation of tumor vessel permeability by thalidomide and its impacts on different types of targeted drug delivery systems in a sarcoma mouse model.

Dan Wang1, Jijun Fu1, Yujie Shi1, Dong Peng2, Lan Yuan3, Bing He1, Wenbing Dai1, Hua Zhang1, Xueqing Wang1, Jie Tian2, Qiang Zhang4.   

Abstract

The transport of nanocarriers is supposed to be based on EPR effect which is affected by diverse factors, so the modulation of EPR effect seems very significant for nanocarriers including targeted drug delivery systems (TDDSs). Besides, it is extremely unclear how the EPR effect impacts the fate of different types of TDDSs. To make the most advantage of EPR effect for TDDSs, it is definitely necessary to clarify these key issues. Here, we construct and characterize various TDDSs, including sterically-stabilized liposomes (SSL), RGD functionalized SSL (RGD-SSL) and novel 7PEP functionalized SSL (7PEP-SSL), loaded with doxorubicin (DOX), DIR or DID. Here, we modulate the permeability of tumor vessels by thalidomide (THD) in a sarcoma-bearing EPR mouse model via monitoring endogenous deoxygenated hemoglobin in circulation, and then we confirm the effect of THD on tumor vessel permeability by vessel density, vessel maturity, VEGF expression and so on. Importantly, we investigate and find the impacts of EPR effect on the antitumor efficacy, in vivo distribution and intratumoral microdistribution of the three TDDSs. Interestingly, the EPR effects affect different TDDSs differently. The elevated EPR effect enhances the tumor accumulation of SSL and RGD-SSL but fails to increase their efficacy. The RGD-SSL exhibits the best efficacy with the least fluctuation, demonstrating the advantage of angiogenesis targeted systems. 7PEP-SSL seems the biggest beneficiary of EPR effect, suggesting the significance of EPR modulation for cells targeted systems. Generally, this study demonstrates the feasibility of modulating EPR effect bidirectionally by THD as well as the impacts of EPR effect on different type of testing TDDSs based on this animal model. It certainly provides novel insight into the design and potential use of TDDSs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model of EPR effect; Antitumor efficacy; Distribution; Targeted drug delivery systems; Thalidomide; Tumor vessel permeability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27422610     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  5 in total

1.  Anti-Cancer Activity Based on the High Docetaxel Loaded Poly(2-Oxazoline)s Micelles.

Authors:  Min Xu; Chong Yao; Wei Zhang; Shen Gao; Hao Zou; Jing Gao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-04-09

Review 2.  Strategies for the enhanced intracellular delivery of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Cláudia Azevedo; Maria Helena Macedo; Bruno Sarmento
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Sequential Modulations of Tumor Vasculature and Stromal Barriers Augment the Active Targeting Efficacy of Antibody-Modified Nanophotosensitizer in Desmoplastic Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yue Yan; Binlong Chen; Zenghui Wang; Qingqing Yin; Yaoqi Wang; Fangjie Wan; Yulin Mo; Bo Xu; Qiang Zhang; Siling Wang; Yiguang Wang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 16.806

4.  Preparation, characterization, in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor effect of thalidomide nanoparticles on lung cancer.

Authors:  Long Xia Chen; Xiao Ling Ni; Heng Zhang; Min Wu; Jing Liu; Shan Xu; Ling Lin Yang; Shao Zhi Fu; Jingbo Wu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-04-23

5.  Colorimetric in situ assay of membrane-bound enzyme based on lipid bilayer inhibition of ion transport.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Defeng Li; Xiquan Yue; Meiling Zhang; Ping Liu; Genxi Li
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 11.556

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.