Alan E Simon1, Emily F Boss2, Carla E Zelaya3, Howard J Hoffman4. 1. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Md. Electronic address: aes360@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md. 3. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Md. 4. Epidemiology and Statistics Program, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pressure equalization tube (PET) placement (also referred to as tympanostomy tube placement) is among the most common ambulatory surgical procedures performed on US children. More than 20 years ago, differences according to race/ethnicity in the national prevalence of having had PETs placed were documented. Whether these differences persist is unknown. METHODS: We used data from the 2014 National Health Interview Survey to examine the percentage of children 0 to 17 years of age who have ever undergone PET placement. Unadjusted logistic regression with predictive margins was used to assess the relationship between having received PETs and race/ethnicity, as well as other clinical, socioeconomic, and geographic factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether other factors could account for any observed differences according to race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Overall, 8.9% of children 0 to 17 years of age had undergone PET surgery. By race/ethnicity, 12.6% of non-Hispanic white children received PETs, which was significantly greater than the 4.8% of non-Hispanic black, 4.4% of Hispanic, and 5.6% of non-Hispanic other/multiple race children who had this surgery (P < .001 for all comparisons). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted prevalence for non-Hispanic white children (10.8%) was greater than for non-Hispanic black (5.4%) and Hispanic (5.8%) children (P < .001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 9% of US children have had PETs placed. Non-Hispanic white children still have a greater prevalence of PET placement compared with non-Hispanic black and Hispanic children. These differences could not be fully explained by other demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, or geographic differences between racial/ethnic groups. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Pressure equalization tube (PET) placement (also referred to as tympanostomy tube placement) is among the most common ambulatory surgical procedures performed on US children. More than 20 years ago, differences according to race/ethnicity in the national prevalence of having had PETs placed were documented. Whether these differences persist is unknown. METHODS: We used data from the 2014 National Health Interview Survey to examine the percentage of children 0 to 17 years of age who have ever undergone PET placement. Unadjusted logistic regression with predictive margins was used to assess the relationship between having received PETs and race/ethnicity, as well as other clinical, socioeconomic, and geographic factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether other factors could account for any observed differences according to race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Overall, 8.9% of children 0 to 17 years of age had undergone PET surgery. By race/ethnicity, 12.6% of non-Hispanic white children received PETs, which was significantly greater than the 4.8% of non-Hispanic black, 4.4% of Hispanic, and 5.6% of non-Hispanic other/multiple race children who had this surgery (P < .001 for all comparisons). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted prevalence for non-Hispanic white children (10.8%) was greater than for non-Hispanic black (5.4%) and Hispanic (5.8%) children (P < .001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 9% of US children have had PETs placed. Non-Hispanic white children still have a greater prevalence of PET placement compared with non-Hispanic black and Hispanic children. These differences could not be fully explained by other demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, or geographic differences between racial/ethnic groups. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Salomeh Keyhani; Lawrence C Kleinman; Michael Rothschild; Joseph M Bernstein; Rebecca Anderson; Melissa Simon; Mark Chassin Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Richard M Rosenfeld; Seth R Schwartz; Melissa A Pynnonen; David E Tunkel; Heather M Hussey; Jeffrey S Fichera; Alison M Grimes; Jesse M Hackell; Melody F Harrison; Helen Haskell; David S Haynes; Tae W Kim; Denis C Lafreniere; Katie LeBlanc; Wendy L Mackey; James L Netterville; Mary E Pipan; Nikhila P Raol; Kenneth G Schellhase Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Tal Marom; Alai Tan; Gregg S Wilkinson; Karen S Pierson; Jean L Freeman; Tasnee Chonmaitree Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Elizabeth H Theng; Carmen C Brewer; Ralf Oheim; Christopher K Zalewski; Kelly A King; Maximillian M Delsmann; Tim Rolvien; Rachel I Gafni; Demetrios T Braddock; H Jeffrey Kim; Carlos R Ferreira Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 4.303
Authors: Cornelius B Groenewald; Helen H Lee; Nathalia Jimenez; Odinakachukwu Ehie; Jennifer A Rabbitts Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 2.549