Amit Bahl1, Ananda Vishnu Pandurangadu2, Jared Tucker2, Michael Bagan2. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI 48073. Electronic address: amit.bahl@beaumont.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI 48073.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed outcomes associated with nurse-performed ultrasound (US)-guided intravenous (IV) placement compared to standard of care (SOC) palpation IV technique on poor vascular access patients. METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective single-site study. Phase 1 involved education/training of a cohort of nurses to perform US-guided IVs. This consisted of a didactic module and hands-on requirement of 10 proctored functional IVs on live subjects. Phase 2 involved patient enrollment. emergency department patients meeting strict criteria of poor access were randomized to US-guided or SOC palpation arm. A functional IV placed by a study nurse was considered successful. Unsuccessful placement implied the study nurse failed, and a rescue IV was attempted. Time to IV placement was the total time required to obtain a functional IV and, if needed, a rescue IV. RESULTS:A total of 124 subjects were enrolled; 63 were randomized to the US-guided arm, and 61 were randomized into the SOC arm; 2 patients were excluded, leaving 59 patients. Success rate was 76% for the US-guided arm and 56% for the SOC arm (P=.02). Compared to the SOC arm, the odds ratio for success for the US-guided arm was 2.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-5.92). The mean time to IV placement for the US-guided arm was 15.8 and 20.7 minutes for the SOC arm (P=.75). CONCLUSION: In difficult access patients, nurses were more successful in obtaining IV access using US guidance than palpation SOC technique. Lengthier placement times were observed more frequently when the SOC IV technique was used.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed outcomes associated with nurse-performed ultrasound (US)-guided intravenous (IV) placement compared to standard of care (SOC) palpation IV technique on poor vascular access patients. METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective single-site study. Phase 1 involved education/training of a cohort of nurses to perform US-guided IVs. This consisted of a didactic module and hands-on requirement of 10 proctored functional IVs on live subjects. Phase 2 involved patient enrollment. emergency department patients meeting strict criteria of poor access were randomized to US-guided or SOC palpation arm. A functional IV placed by a study nurse was considered successful. Unsuccessful placement implied the study nurse failed, and a rescue IV was attempted. Time to IV placement was the total time required to obtain a functional IV and, if needed, a rescue IV. RESULTS: A total of 124 subjects were enrolled; 63 were randomized to the US-guided arm, and 61 were randomized into the SOC arm; 2 patients were excluded, leaving 59 patients. Success rate was 76% for the US-guided arm and 56% for the SOC arm (P=.02). Compared to the SOC arm, the odds ratio for success for the US-guided arm was 2.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-5.92). The mean time to IV placement for the US-guided arm was 15.8 and 20.7 minutes for the SOC arm (P=.75). CONCLUSION: In difficult access patients, nurses were more successful in obtaining IV access using US guidance than palpation SOC technique. Lengthier placement times were observed more frequently when the SOC IV technique was used.
Authors: Lance S Patak; Kevin M Stroschein; Renelle Risley; Michael Collins; Cornelius B Groenewald Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 2.556
Authors: Céline Bridey; Nathalie Thilly; Thomas Lefevre; Adeline Maire-Richard; Maxime Morel; Bruno Levy; Nicolas Girerd; Antoine Kimmoun Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-06-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Hamid Shokoohi; Michael A Loesche; Nicole M Duggan; Andrew S Liteplo; Calvin Huang; Ahad A Al Saud; Dustin McEvoy; Shan W Liu; Sayon Dutta Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2020-08-19
Authors: Rasmus Jørgensen; Christian B Laursen; Lars Konge; Pia Iben Pietersen Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2021-06-27 Impact factor: 2.953