Literature DB >> 27421878

A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework to investigate why patients were or were not assessed for rehabilitation after stroke.

Elizabeth A Lynch1, Julie A Luker1,2,3, Dominique A Cadilhac2,3,4, Caroline E Fryer1, Susan L Hillier1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the factors perceived to affect rehabilitation assessment and referral practices for patients with stroke.
DESIGN: Qualitative study using data from focus groups analysed thematically and then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.
SETTING: Eight acute stroke units in two states of Australia.
SUBJECTS: Health professionals working in acute stroke units.
INTERVENTIONS: Health professionals at all sites had participated in interventions to improve rehabilitation assessment and referral practices, which included provision of copies of an evidence-based decision-making rehabilitation Assessment Tool and pathway.
RESULTS: Eight focus groups were conducted (32 total participants). Reported rehabilitation assessment and referral practices varied markedly between units. Continence and mood were not routinely assessed (4 units), and people with stroke symptoms were not consistently referred to rehabilitation (4 units). Key factors influencing practice were identified and included whether health professionals perceived that use of the Assessment Tool would improve rehabilitation assessment practices (theoretical domain 'social and professional role'); beliefs about outcomes from changing practice such as increased equity for patients or conversely that changing rehabilitation referral patterns would not affect access to rehabilitation ('belief about consequences'); the influence of the unit's relationships with other groups including rehabilitation teams ('social influences' domain) and understanding within the acute stroke unit team of the purpose of changing assessment practices ('knowledge' domain).
CONCLUSION: This study has identified that health professionals' perceived roles, beliefs about consequences from changing practice and relationships with rehabilitation service providers were perceived to influence rehabilitation assessment and referral practices on Australian acute stroke units.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; Theoretical Domains Framework; acute stroke unit; assessment for rehabilitation; qualitative study

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27421878     DOI: 10.1177/0269215516658938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  6 in total

1.  Does pre-existing cognitive impairment impact on amount of stroke rehabilitation received? An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Verity Longley; Sarah Peters; Caroline Swarbrick; Sarah Rhodes; Audrey Bowen
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.477

2.  Exploring the usability of the COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to define the helpers of and hindrances to evidence-based practice in midwifery.

Authors:  Annemarie De Leo; Sara Bayes; Dianne Bloxsome; Janice Butt
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-01-12

3.  Factors influencing follow-up care post-TIA and minor stroke: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.

Authors:  Grace M Turner; Maria Raisa Jessica V Aquino; Lou Atkins; Robbie Foy; Jonathan Mant; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Education-only versus a multifaceted intervention for improving assessment of rehabilitation needs after stroke; a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lynch; Dominique A Cadilhac; Julie A Luker; Susan L Hillier
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  What influences decisions about ongoing stroke rehabilitation for patients with pre-existing dementia or cognitive impairment: a qualitative study?

Authors:  Verity Longley; Sarah Peters; Caroline Swarbrick; Audrey Bowen
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.477

6.  What factors affect clinical decision-making about access to stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review.

Authors:  Verity Longley; Sarah Peters; Caroline Swarbrick; Audrey Bowen
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.477

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.