Literature DB >> 27421779

Natural History of Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Evaluation of Factors Related to Clinical Events and Intervention.

Daniel Olvera-Posada1, Sohrab Naushad Ali2, Marie Dion2, Husain Alenezi2, John D Denstedt2, Hassan Razvi3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the natural history of residual fragments (RF) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in long-term patient follow-up and to identify possible predictive factors for future intervention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed all patients from 2006 to 2013 with postoperative computed tomography scan revealing RF, who did not undergo second-look nephroscopy or immediate ancillary procedures, and with at least 12 months of clinical follow-up. We evaluated factors associated with clinical, radiological, and surgical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to calculate the proportion of asymptomatic and treatment-free patients during follow-up.
RESULTS: From 781 percutaneous nephrolithotomies performed, 202 patients underwent postoperative computed tomography scan and 44 patients with residual stones were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 57.9 months. A total of 24 patients (54.5%) developed at least 1 clinical outcome, and 32 (72.7%) patients had a surgical intervention. Only 4 patients had radiological evidence of stone passage. Multivariate analysis found that RF >4 mm and struvite or apatite stones were significant predictors for surgical intervention. The 5-year estimated probability to remain intervention free was 29%.
CONCLUSION: Despite the size of the RF, the vast majority of patients required an intervention during long-term follow-up. We identified that RFs of diameter >4 mm associate with the need for a surgical therapy, but the rate of clinical events was not affected by the size or location of the stones. Struvite or apatite composition stones had an increased risk of intervention during follow-up. Spontaneous passage was an uncommon event in this cohort.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27421779     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Risk factors for sepsis in patients with struvite stones following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Xiaomin Gao; Chaoyue Lu; Fei Xie; Ling Li; Min Liu; Ziyu Fang; Zeyu Wang; Shaoxiong Ming; Hao Dong; Rong Shen; Yinghao Sun; Yonghan Peng; Xiaofeng Gao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Physical therapy in the management of stone fragments: progress, status, and needs.

Authors:  Suoshi Jing; Qiongyan Gai; Xin Zhao; Juan Wang; Yuwen Gong; Yangyang Pang; Chen Peng; Yuejun Tian; Yuhan Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Asymptomatic Renal Stones-to Treat or Not to Treat.

Authors:  Necole M Streeper
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Shock Wave Lithotripsy is More Effective for Residual Fragments after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy than for Primary Stones of the Same Size: A Matched Pair Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Dariush Irani; Hossein Amirzargar
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2018-06-30

5.  Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography for detecting residual stones in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  R A Kingma; M J H Voskamp; B H J Doornweerd; I J de Jong; S Roemeling
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.436

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.