Literature DB >> 27421587

International Rates of Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty, 2004-2014.

James F Fraser1, Mark J Spangehl2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patella resurfacing is performed in >80% of primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in the United States, yet far fewer patellae are resurfaced internationally. Recent registry data have begun to question the long-held belief that patellar resurfacing yields lower revision rates. Multiple current meta-analyses have not shown a difference in patient satisfaction, anterior knee pain, or knee society scores based on patellar resurfacing.
METHODS: We sought to determine how the rates of patellar resurfacing have changed over the past 10 years worldwide (2004-2014). Data were abstracted from the annual reports of 7 national joint registries, literature review, or via direct correspondence with registry administrators.
RESULTS: Average rates of patellar resurfacing from 2004 to 2014 ranged from 4% (Norway) to 82% (United States). The largest decrease in resurfacing rates was in Sweden (15%-2%), whereas the biggest increase was in Australia (44%-59%). In 2010, only 48,367 of 137,813 (35%) primary TKAs from all registries outside the United States were resurfaced. Meta-analyses have demonstrated no difference in anterior knee pain or satisfaction scores but do consistently report increased revision rates for unresurfaced patellae. Recent Swedish registry data, however, showed a reverse trend toward higher revision rates after resurfacing.
CONCLUSION: Despite recent registry data and meta-analyses demonstrating equivalent outcomes among resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae in primary TKA, worldwide trends in patellar resurfacing have changed little over the past decade. Most countries outside the United States continue to resurface a much smaller proportion of patellae.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  international; literature review; patella resurfacing; primary knee arthroplasty; revision rates; total joint registry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27421587     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  12 in total

1.  What Can We Learn From Surgeons Who Perform THA and TKA and Have the Lowest Revision Rates? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Wayne Hoskins; Sophia Rainbird; Michelle Lorimer; Stephen E Graves; Roger Bingham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Clinical effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing and selective resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional and observational evidence.

Authors:  Michal Grela; Matthew Barrett; Setor K Kunutsor; Ashley W Blom; Michael R Whitehouse; Gulraj S Matharu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 3.  The Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Prosthesis: Indications for Bone Stock and Patellar Morphology.

Authors:  Luigi Molfetta; Andrea Casabella; Augusto Palermo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-24

4.  Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maeruan Kebbach; Martin Darowski; Sven Krueger; Christoph Schilling; Thomas M Grupp; Rainer Bader; Andreas Geier
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Association Between Femoral Component Sagittal Positioning and Anterior Knee Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Case-Control Follow-up Study of a Cruciate-Retaining Single-Radius Design.

Authors:  Chloe E H Scott; Nicholas D Clement; Liam Z Yapp; Deborah J MacDonald; James T Patton; Richard Burnett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Patella resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty is cost-effective and has lower re-operation rates compared to non-resurfacing.

Authors:  Thomas Parsons; Talal Al-Jabri; Nick D Clement; Nicola Maffulli; Deiary F Kader
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Rare primary patellar resurfacing does not lead to more secondary patellar resurfacing: analysis of 70,014 primary total knee arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).

Authors:  Bart J Robben; Astrid J De Vries; Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren; Rob G H H Nelissen; Reinoud W Brouwer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Patellar osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing: a potentially underappreciated problem.

Authors:  Zachary K Christopher; David G Deckey; Andrew S Chung; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-10-24

9.  The effect of patient and prosthesis factors on revision rates after total knee replacement using a multi-registry meta-analytic approach.

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; Annette W-Dahl; Otto Robertsson; Michelle Lorimer; Heather A Prentice; Stephen E Graves; Elizabeth W Paxton
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Patellar resurfacing versus patellar nonresurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Chengzhi Hou; Xuelei Chu; Bingbing Zhang; Jiaxian Li; Yongli Dong; Yong Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.