Literature DB >> 27421239

Diving physiology of seabirds and marine mammals: Relevance, challenges and some solutions for field studies.

Russel D Andrews1, Manfred R Enstipp2.   

Abstract

To fully understand how diving seabirds and marine mammals balance the potentially conflicting demands of holding their breath while living their lives underwater (and maintaining physiological homeostasis during exercise, feeding, growth, and reproduction), physiological studies must be conducted with animals in their natural environments. The purpose of this article is to review the importance of making physiological measurements on diving animals in field settings, while acknowledging the challenges and highlighting some solutions. The most extreme divers are great candidates for study, especially in a comparative and mechanistic context. However, physiological data are also required of a wide range of species for problems relating to other disciplines, in particular ecology and conservation biology. Physiological data help with understanding and predicting the outcomes of environmental change, and the direct impacts of anthropogenic activities. Methodological approaches that have facilitated the development of field-based diving physiology include the isolated diving hole protocol and the translocation paradigm, and while there are many techniques for remote observation, animal-borne biotelemetry, or "biologging", has been critical. We discuss issues related to the attachment of instruments, the retrieval of data and sensing of physiological variables, while also considering negative impacts of tagging. This is illustrated with examples from a variety of species, and an in-depth look at one of the best studied and most extreme divers, the emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri). With a variety of approaches and high demand for data on the physiology of diving seabirds and marine mammals, the future of field studies is bright.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biologging; Cetacean; Diving behavior; Diving physiology; Energetics; Foraging; Logger; Penguin; Pinniped; Seal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27421239     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol        ISSN: 1095-6433            Impact factor:   2.320


  4 in total

1.  Future trends in measuring physiology in free-living animals.

Authors:  H J Williams; J Ryan Shipley; C Rutz; M Wikelski; M Wilkes; L A Hawkes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Common metabolic constraints on dive duration in endothermic and ectothermic vertebrates.

Authors:  April Hayward; Mariela Pajuelo; Catherine G Haase; David M Anderson; James F Gillooly
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  The evolution of dermal shield vascularization in Testudinata and Pseudosuchia: phylogenetic constraints versus ecophysiological adaptations.

Authors:  François Clarac; Torsten M Scheyer; Julia B Desojo; Ignacio A Cerda; Sophie Sanchez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Influence of hunting strategy on foraging efficiency in Galapagos sea lions.

Authors:  Jessica-Anne Blakeway; John P Y Arnould; Andrew J Hoskins; Patricia Martin-Cabrera; Grace J Sutton; Luis A Huckstadt; Daniel P Costa; Diego Páez-Rosas; Stella Villegas-Amtmann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.