Samantha R Tucker1, Susan A Speer2, Sarah Peters3. 1. School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Electronic address: samantha.tucker@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk. 2. School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Electronic address: susan.speer@manchester.ac.uk. 3. School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Electronic address: sarah.peters@manchester.ac.uk.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer in men, affecting one in eight. An ageing population coupled with increased testing indicates that the incidence of early-stage prostate cancer is rising rapidly. Treatments are effective, but all can result in chronic sexual side effects and impact on the psychological, emotional and relational components of sexual functioning. Whilst the physical consequences of treatment are well documented, we lack a comprehensive picture of the effects of localised prostate cancer treatment on men's experience of sexual intimacy and how this may affect survivorship and recovery. OBJECTIVE: This study synthesises the qualitative literature related to men's experience of sexual intimacy in the context of localised prostate cancer. METHODS: A systematic search strategy identified 12 studies, which were assessed using a modified version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Using Noblit and Hare's (1988) approach, a meta-synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Findings are organised within four inter-related themes that form the basis of a new conceptual explanatory model: (i) Loss and grief: Destroyed intimacy; (ii) Going through the motions: Artificial intimacy; (iii) Fear of failure: Avoiding intimacy and (iv) Breaking barriers: Constructing an alternative intimacy. CONCLUSION: The LMAC (Loss, Motions, Avoidance and Construction) model provides a new way of conceptualising sexual recovery following prostate cancer treatment and opportunities for health care professionals to support men and their partners.
RATIONALE: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer in men, affecting one in eight. An ageing population coupled with increased testing indicates that the incidence of early-stage prostate cancer is rising rapidly. Treatments are effective, but all can result in chronic sexual side effects and impact on the psychological, emotional and relational components of sexual functioning. Whilst the physical consequences of treatment are well documented, we lack a comprehensive picture of the effects of localised prostate cancer treatment on men's experience of sexual intimacy and how this may affect survivorship and recovery. OBJECTIVE: This study synthesises the qualitative literature related to men's experience of sexual intimacy in the context of localised prostate cancer. METHODS: A systematic search strategy identified 12 studies, which were assessed using a modified version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Using Noblit and Hare's (1988) approach, a meta-synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Findings are organised within four inter-related themes that form the basis of a new conceptual explanatory model: (i) Loss and grief: Destroyed intimacy; (ii) Going through the motions: Artificial intimacy; (iii) Fear of failure: Avoiding intimacy and (iv) Breaking barriers: Constructing an alternative intimacy. CONCLUSION: The LMAC (Loss, Motions, Avoidance and Construction) model provides a new way of conceptualising sexual recovery following prostate cancer treatment and opportunities for health care professionals to support men and their partners.
Authors: David-Dan Nguyen; Alejandro Berlin; Andrew G Matthew; Nathan Perlis; Dean S Elterman Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 2.896
Authors: Nicole Collaço; Carol Rivas; Lauren Matheson; Johana Nayoan; Richard Wagland; Obrey Alexis; Anna Gavin; Adam Glaser; Eila Watson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marigdalia K Ramirez-Fort; Paula Suarez; Margely Carrion; Daniel Weiner; Claire Postl; Ricardo Arribas; Mehdi Sayyah; Digna V Forta; M Junaid Niaz; Amir Feily; Christopher S Lange; Zhahedia Zhaythseff Fort; Migdalia Fort Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2020-04-30
Authors: Bach Xuan Tran; Carl A Latkin; Noha Sharafeldin; Katherina Nguyen; Giang Thu Vu; Wilson W S Tam; Ngai-Man Cheung; Huong Lan Thi Nguyen; Cyrus S H Ho; Roger C M Ho Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2019-09-15
Authors: Christopher W Wheldon; Elizabeth J Polter; B R Simon Rosser; Aditya Kapoor; Kristine M C Talley; Ryan Haggart; Nidhi Kohli; Badrinath R Konety; Darryl Mitteldorf; Michael W Ross; William West; Morgan Wright Journal: J Sex Res Date: 2021-07-03