BACKGROUND The cause of multiple sclerosis (MS) is currently unknown, but it is thought that oxidative damage and iron metabolism mechanisms are involved. The aim of this study was to examine ceruloplasmin concentration in MS patients based on various immunomodifying therapies and to test the effect of antioxidative melatonin on ceruloplasmin levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective study included 102 MS patients and 15 healthy controls. Patients were divided into groups according to different immunomodifying therapies: interferons beta 1a, interferons beta 1b, glatiramer acetate, mitoxantrone, and immunomodifying pre-treatment (A, B, G, Mx, and P groups, respectively), and the relapse R group. MS patients were supplemented with melatonin for 3 months. Serum ceruloplasmin concentrations, EDSS, brain MRI, serum C-reactive protein level, and white blood cell count were examined. RESULTS The results indicated significantly increased levels of ceruloplasmin in MS patients. No differences in ceruloplasmin concentrations between the relapse group and controls were observed. In A and G groups, ceruloplasmin levels before and after melatonin were similar to levels in controls. In group B, ceruloplasmin concentration was significantly higher vs. control and relapse groups. After melatonin administration in group B, ceruloplasmin levels decreased. Ceruloplasmin concentrations in the Mx group were significantly higher compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS We found for the first time that ceruloplasmin concentration in MS patients varies depending on different immunomodulatory treatment and decrease after 3 months of melatonin administration. Ceruloplasmin could be a valuable serum marker for the chronic demyelinating process participating in oxidative stress mechanisms, as well as a neurodegenerative marker, but not a marker of acute-phase MS.
BACKGROUND The cause of multiple sclerosis (MS) is currently unknown, but it is thought that oxidative damage and iron metabolism mechanisms are involved. The aim of this study was to examine ceruloplasmin concentration in MSpatients based on various immunomodifying therapies and to test the effect of antioxidative melatonin on ceruloplasmin levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective study included 102 MSpatients and 15 healthy controls. Patients were divided into groups according to different immunomodifying therapies: interferons beta 1a, interferons beta 1b, glatiramer acetate, mitoxantrone, and immunomodifying pre-treatment (A, B, G, Mx, and P groups, respectively), and the relapse R group. MSpatients were supplemented with melatonin for 3 months. Serum ceruloplasmin concentrations, EDSS, brain MRI, serum C-reactive protein level, and white blood cell count were examined. RESULTS The results indicated significantly increased levels of ceruloplasmin in MSpatients. No differences in ceruloplasmin concentrations between the relapse group and controls were observed. In A and G groups, ceruloplasmin levels before and after melatonin were similar to levels in controls. In group B, ceruloplasmin concentration was significantly higher vs. control and relapse groups. After melatonin administration in group B, ceruloplasmin levels decreased. Ceruloplasmin concentrations in the Mx group were significantly higher compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS We found for the first time that ceruloplasmin concentration in MSpatients varies depending on different immunomodulatory treatment and decrease after 3 months of melatonin administration. Ceruloplasmin could be a valuable serum marker for the chronic demyelinating process participating in oxidative stress mechanisms, as well as a neurodegenerative marker, but not a marker of acute-phase MS.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory-demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease that causes damage to the central nervous system. The incidence is highest in younger women. The main form of MS is remitting-relapsing (RRMS), characterized by occurrence of new symptoms followed by periods of clinical remission. After many years of RRMS, the neurodegenerative process intensifies, as evidenced by lack of relapses and the appearance of the secondary progressive form of MS (SPMS). Neurodegeneration and inflammation are present in all forms of MS, and are morphologically and quantitatively associated with each other [1,2]. Although the cause of MS is currently unknown, recent studies showed that oxidative damage mechanisms are involved [3,4]. Some reports indicate a close relationship between oxidative stress processes and iron metabolism [5,6]. Iron may contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of multiple sclerosis due to its accumulation in the brain, particularly within oligodendrocytes and myelin fibers, and iron contributes to demyelination and neurodegeneration [7]. There are some iron-related proteins involved, such as ferritin, hephaestin, and ceruloplasmin [5].There are many defense systems against oxidative damage processes. They can be divided into enzymatic and non-enzymatic, as well as endogenic and exogenic. Antioxidants are present in serum, plasma, and erythrocytes. Natural defense mechanisms of tissues against oxidative damage involve an acute-phase reaction in which many serum proteins take part, especially albumin, ceruloplasmin, haptoglobin, and transferrin, which may act as antioxidants. Erythrocytes are a source of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutases (SODs), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and glutathione (GSH) [8].Ceruloplasmin is one of the main proteins taking part in copper metabolism by distributing it in the human body; it belongs to the group of alpha2-globulins. One molecule of ceruloplasmin binds 6 atoms of copper. It is responsible for carrying more than 95% of copper in blood serum, with the rest being transported by albumins [9]. Ceruloplasmin, produced mainly in the liver, is also a positive-phase protein, which means its level changes in chronic and acute inflammatory diseases [10,11]. It was reported that ceruloplasmin as an antioxidant can scavenge ROS (reactive oxygen species) [12]. On the cellular level in the central nervous system, ceruloplasmin was detected mainly in human astrocytes, but also in axons and in extracellular space. During the inflammatory process when the blood-brain barrier is damaged, increased ceruloplasmin uptake by astrocytes and axons is observed [5]. There is little research concerning the importance of ceruloplasmin in MSpatients and the data are inconsistent. Some authors found that the ceruloplasmin level in MSpatients is elevated, particularly during relapse, and decreases after steroid treatment, but others report no differences in ceruloplasmin concentration in healthy controls and MSpatients, both during steroid treatment and without steroids [4,13-16]. Decreased serum ceruloplasmin in MS and other neurological inflammatory-disorderedpatients was also reported [17].The antioxidative properties of melatonin have been shown by many authors [18-20] and also by our team [21,22]. However, its potential role in MS treatment remains unclear. Some recent research suggests the role of melatonin in MS course [23]. Therefore, the seasonally-dependent relapse seems to be related to melatonin secretion, depending on the day length [24]. The depression that is very often observed in MSpatients may be closely connected to alterations in melatonin and consequent serotonin metabolism [25]. The impact of melatonin on MS treatment was also the subject of interest of our team in recent years, and our results show the beneficial role of melatonin supplementation in this disease [26-30].Melatonin influences the oxidative status and was found to affect ceruloplasmin levels in experimental protocols of oxidative stress induced in animals, as well as in clinical trials in diabeticpatients [31-33].Our previous reports showed that MSpatients have increased oxidative stress markers and that oral supplementation with melatonin acts as an antioxidant [26-30]. Based on this promising information, as well as the conflicting information about the role of ceruloplasmin in MS, we conducted the present research. The aim of our study was to examine the serum concentration of ceruloplasmin acute-phase protein in MSpatients based on different immunomodifying therapies. We were also interested in the effect of the potent antioxidant, melatonin, on ceruloplasmin levels. Additionally, we attempted to determine whether there are correlations between serum ceruloplasmin level and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration or white blood cell (WBC) count.
Material and Methods
Patients
This prospective study was carried out on 117 subjects observed in 2014 in the Department of Neurology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Poland. We included 102 MSpatients diagnosed according to the McDonald criteria (2005) with various forms of disease: RRMS, SPMS, and progressive-relapsing form (PRMS) [34]. The control group consisted of 15 healthy subjects matched for age and sex with the MSpatients (p>0.05), but in the Mitoxantrone-treated group age and disease duration were significantly different from others. This exception is a consequence of characteristics of the disease: SPMS and PRMS form develop from previous RRMS form, so they appear in later life. The male-to-female ratio was similar in all groups and ranged from 1:2 to 1:2.75.We excluded patients with the following chronic disorders: diabetes; obesity (BMI over 30); hormonal, urinary, or liver abnormalities; infectious or inflammatory diseases; dyslipidemia; and smoking. We also excluded patients taking antioxidative substances, vitamins, or anti-inflammatory medications, as well as those who received hormonal treatment within the last 3 months before the study and those who took sleeping medication in the last 2 weeks before to the study.Patients were divided into the following groups:Group C (control group): 15 healthy controls visiting in our Department’s ambulatory clinic due to undiagnosed headaches. All control group individuals were considered as healthy and were selected using the exclusion criteria.Group A (interferons beta 1a-treated RRMS group): 21 patients receiving interferon beta-1a, administered once a week as an intramuscular injection or 3 times a week as a subcutaneous injection.Group B (interferons beta 1b-treated RRMS group): 23 patients treated with interferon beta-1b, subcutaneously injected every other day.Group G (glatiramer acetate-treated RRMS group): 11 patients receiving glatiramer acetate daily, subcutaneously injected.Group Mx (Mitoxantrone-treated MS group): 18 patients with SPMS or PRMS form. All of them received 5 doses of mitoxantrone iv quarterly (12 mg/m2/dose).Group P (pre-treated RRMS group): 17 patients with de novo diagnosed RRMS form, without any MS immunomodifying treatment.Group R (relapse RRMS group): 12 patients during diagnosed clinical and radiological relapse before steroid therapy.Demographic characteristics of studied groups are presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics of studied subjects.
Group
C
A
B
G
Mx
P
R
Patients number (n) (Total n=117)
15
21
23
11
18
17
12
Age (years)
36.45±8.16
41.22±7.13
39.48±9.42
38.95±10.76
55.74±6.21
37.33±9.23
41.90±7.13
Age significance value (vs. C group)
NA
0.17
0.13
0.56
0.0042
0.84
0.09
Female/Male number (n) (ratio)
11/4 (2.75)
14/7 (2)
16/7 (2.28)
8/3 (2.66)
13/5 (2.6)
12/5 (2.4)
8/4 (2)
EDSS
NA
2.44±0.97
2.47±0.89
3.31±0.77
5.95±1.81
1.37±0.75
3.96±1.98
Disease duration (years)
NA
5.14±3.75
7.13±5.11
4.63±3.09
21.72±14.66
1.45±0.91
6.53±5.13
Treatment duration (months)
NA
21.00±11.95
34.86±14.51
37.55±26.91
19.96±12.43
NA
14.74±11.96
Number of T2 brain MRI lesions
NA
25.88±0.29
26.13±0.91
34.53±0.21
34.69±0.89
23.16±1.71
32.935.11
Number of T1 Gd(+) brain MRI lesions
NA
0.51±0.11
0.64±0.36
0.23±0.25
0
0.38±0.14
1.96±0.83
Presented groups: A (beta-1a interferons treated RRMS group), B (beta-1b interferons treated RRMS group), G (glatiramer acetate treated RRMS group), Mx (mitoxantrone treated SP or PR MS group), P (immunomodifying pre-treated RRMS group), C (control healthy group), R (relapse RRMS group). NA – non applicable. Data was presented as mean ±SD.
Study protocol
All the procedures were performed after informed consent. Demographic data evaluation, Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and MRI examinations were performed in all MSpatients at the beginning of the study. All MSpatients were supplemented with melatonin 5 mg daily for 90 days. Before and after melatonin supplementation, the serum ceruloplasmin concentrations were measured.
Enzymatic assays
Before and after 90 days of melatonin administration, 10 mL samples of venous blood were collected from MSpatients between 6:00 and 7:00 a.m., centrifuged, and frozen until laboratory testing. Blood samples from controls were collected at the beginning of the study. Serum ceruloplasmin concentration was determined according to the method of Richterich [35] based on the fact that ceruloplasmin catalyzes the oxidation of p-phenylenediamine, forming a colored product that can be directly determined by spectrophotometry. The rate of formation of that product is proportional to ceruloplasmin concentration (mg/dl).
C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cells (WBC)
Serum concentration of CRP, an acute-phase protein, was measured using the dry chemistry immunological method and a VITROS 250 analyzer (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Johnson and Johnson, USA). WBC count was measured in blood using an ADVIA hematology analyzer (model 2120).
Neuroimaging
At the beginning of the study, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all MSpatients. Imaging was performed with the use of a General Electric HDx 1.5T scanner (USA). Patients were scanned with a standard head protocol (multiple planes, slice thickness 5 mm, contrast media: Gadovist (Gd)) and additional postcontrast 3DT1 sequences (1-mm slice thickness). The scans were evaluated according to the approximate number of supratentorial and infratentorial plaques in T2 images. The number of Gd-enhancing T1 plaques was calculated.
Statistics
The results are expressed as means ±SD. Normally distributed data were tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon test were used for comparisons between groups. Differences between means were considered significant at p<0.05. Correlation analysis was performed using the Pearson test. Results were statistically analyzed using STATISTICA v. 8.0 (StatSoft, Poland).The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Silesia (KNW/0022/KB1/130/12).
Results
We found significantly increased levels of serum ceruloplasmin in MSpatients without immunomodifying therapy compared to healthy individuals (32.9±8.72 vs. 26.39±5.39 mg/dl; p=0.0048) (Figures 1–4). We found no significant differences in serum ceruloplasmin concentrations between the relapse group (group R) patients and the controls (25.92±6.04 vs. 26.39±5.39 mg/dl; p>0.05).
Figure 1
Serum ceruloplasmin concentration in control group (C), immunomodifying MS pre-treated group (P), MS relapse group (R), and in MS INF-beta 1A-treated group (A) before and after 3 months of melatonin treatment (+Mel). Data presented as mean±SD; * p=0.0048 vs. control group.
Figure 2
Serum ceruloplasmin concentration in control group (C), immunomodifying MS pre-treated group (P), MS relapse group (R), and in MS INF-beta 1B-treated group (B) before and after 3 months of melatonin treatment (+Mel). Data presented as mean ±SD; * p<0.05 vs. control group; # p<0.05 vs. relapse group; ● p<0.05 vs. B group.
Figure 3
Serum ceruloplasmin concentration in control group (C), immunomodifying MS pre-treated group (P), MS relapse group (R), and in MS glatiramer acetate-treated group (G) before and after 3 months of melatonin treatment (+Mel). Data presented as mean ±SD; * p=0.0048 vs. control group.
Figure 4
Serum ceruloplasmin concentration in control group (C), immunomodifying MS pre-treated group (P), MS relapse group (R), and in MS mitoxantrone-treated group (Mx) before and after 3 months of melatonin treatment (+Mel). Data presented as mean ±SD; * p<0.05 vs. control group.
In group A (interferons beta 1a-treated patients), ceruloplasmin serum levels before and after simultaneous treatment with melatonin were similar (28.58+−4.88 vs. 29.59=−5.55 mg/dl; p=0.61) and did not significantly differ from the level observed in the control group (p=0.29 and p=0.18, respectively) (Figure 1), and it was similar to that in the pretreated group (p=0.09 and p=0.22, respectively).In group B (interferons beta 1b-treated patients), serum ceruloplasmin concentration (36.97±8.6 mg/dl) was significantly higher than in the control (p=0.0009) and relapse groups (p=0.001), but it was similar to that in the pretreated group (p=0.067). These levels were also significantly higher compared to group A patients (p=0.001). Interestingly, after 3 months of melatonin administration in group B patients, the levels of ceruloplasmin decreased significantly (36.97±8.6 vs. 27.63±4.63 mg/dl; p=0.012), achieving levels similar to those in controls (p=0.55) (Figure 2).Similar to group A, no significant changes were observed between controls, pretreated group, and relapse group, and after melatonin treatment in the group G (glatiramer acetate) patients (26.39±5.39, 32.9±8.72, 25.92±6.04, 27±0.42 vs. 31.26±5.31 mg/dl, respectively; p>0.05) (Figure 3).Serum ceruloplasmin concentrations in mitoxantrone-treated patients (Mx group) were similar to those in the pretreated group (p=0.89) and were significantly higher compared to controls (32.94±7.35 vs. 26.39±5.39 mg/dl; p=0.03). After melatonin administration in the Mx patient group, the levels of ceruloplasmin decreased slightly, but insignificantly (30.36±1.45 mg/dl) (Figure 4).The data describing the number of brain MRI changes in the examined groups are presented in Table 1. A strong correlation between the mean number of T2 brain MRI lesions and serum ceruloplasmin concentration was found only in group P (r=0.8, p<0.05).We also evaluated serum CRP concentration and WBC counts in our patients (Table 2). Significantly higher serum CRP concentrations compared to controls were found in the pretreated MSpatients group, relapse group, and Mx-treated group, and these values were elevated above reference levels. Similarly, WBC count in Mx, P, and R groups were higher than in controls, but ranging near the upper limit of reference values. We found no correlation between ceruloplasmin level and CRP concentration or WBC count. No correlations between serum ceruloplasmin concentration and EDSS or disease duration were found.
Table 2
Serum CRP concentration and WBC count.
Group
C
A
B
G
Mx
P
R
CRP (mg/dL) (reference range 0–5)
0.96± 0.48
2.79± 1.48a,b,c
2.89± 1.88a,b,c
3.24± 1.67d
5.67± 1.12d,e,f
7.52± 1.55d,e,f
8.46± 1.32d,e,f
WBC (×103 cells/μL) (reference range 5.5–15.5)
6.11± 0.98
7.01± 1.87a,b
6.69± 2.51a,b
6.81± 1.84a,b
9.37± 2.19d
16.01± 3.17d,e,f,g
15.98± 4.01d,e,f,g
Presented groups: A (beta-1a interferons treated RRMS group), B (beta-1b interferons treated RRMS group), G (glatiramer acetate treated RRMS group), Mx (mitoxantrone treated SP or PR MS group), P (immunomodifying pre-treated RRMS group), C (control healthy group), R (relapse RRMS group). Data was presented as mean±SD.
p<0.05 vs. P group;
p<0.05 vs. R group;
p<0.05 vs. Mx group;
p<0.05 vs. C group;
p<0.05 vs. A group;
p<0.05 vs. B group;
p<0.05 vs. G group.
Discussion
Multiple sclerosis is a demyelinating disease involving inflammatory processes. The cause of the disease remains unknown. Recent studies strongly suggest that an oxidative stress mechanism participates in MS etiopathology [3-6,8,13-16,36]. Our previous reports also supported the presence of increased oxidative stress markers in MSpatients [26-30]. Based on this, we are interested in finding specific marker indicating disease progression.Ceruloplasmin is considered to be a preventive plasma antioxidant participating in iron metabolism and thereby preventing free radical reactions [37]. Additionally, since it was shown in both experimental and clinical studies that MS is strongly connected with iron storage in the brain, ceruloplasmin seems to play an integral role in the pathology of MS [7,38]. Taken together, the findings mentioned above, and the fact that inflammation seems to be the main pathogenetic mechanism in multiple sclerosis, indicate that we should expect ceruloplasmin levels will vary according to disease activity and therapies, but there are few reports in the literature on this topic and the data from different studies are inconsistent. Smith et al. found no differences in ceruloplasmin levels in MSpatients with or without steroid therapy compared to controls [16], while others reported a decrease in ceruloplasmin in MS and other inflammatory diseases [17]. Results from our work show that ceruloplasmin serum concentration is elevated in MSpatients compared to healthy controls, which can be clearly seen in MS pre-treated individuals. This is in line with our previous studies and expectations, because ceruloplasmin level, as a positive-phase protein, may be increased in chronic and acute inflammatory diseases [11]. Other authors have reported results similar to ours, both in laboratory and clinical studies. It was reported that experimentally-induced oxidative stress is connected with increased serum ceruloplasmin level in rats [31]. In clinical trials, ceruloplasmin concentration in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid was found to be up-regulated in MSpatients in comparison to healthy subjects [4,14]. Fiorini et al. emphasized an increase in the ceruloplasmin level during active relapse phase of multiple sclerosis vs. remission [4]. Moreover, steroid treatment was reported to lead to a decrease in ceruloplasmin levels in serum and cerebrospinal fluid [13]. In the present study we did not observe such effects because in our relapse group ceruloplasmin levels were similar to levels in controls.In the present study, immunomodifying treatment did not induce significant changes in serum ceruloplasmin level compared to the pre-treated group. In the groups treated with mitoxantrone and interferons beta 1b, the levels were significantly higher compared to healthy controls. Interestingly, in patients treated with interferons beta 1b and glatiramer acetate, ceruloplasmin levels were insignificantly lower compared to the pre-treated MS group, and achieved levels similar to those of the control group. The results of the present study agree with the fact that mitoxantrone generates ROS [39]. Moreover, we previously reported increased oxidative stress parameters in mitoxantrone-treated MSpatients [26]. Unfortunately, there is very little data in the literature on the effect of various forms of MS treatment (especially concerning the most recently discovered molecules) on oxidative stress parameters. Therefore, although we previously observed the increased total oxidant status in patients using interferons beta-1b compared to interferons beta-1a- or glatiramer acetate-treated individuals, this matter needs further investigation [29].The theoretical premises suggest that acute-phase proteins should be useful in monitoring inflammatory diseases; however, the studies prove that in particular diseases not all of them increase to the same extent. In Guillain-Barr syndrome, for example, only haptoglobin, and to a lesser degree, ceruloplasmin, are useful [36]. Ceruloplasmin could be a valuable chronic demyelinating process serum marker connected with oxidative stress mechanisms, as well as a neurodegenerative marker, but not in the acute phase of MS. Interestingly, we noticed that ceruloplasmin levels in immunomodifying pre-treated MSpatients were correlated with the number of T2 brain MRI changes. This correlation might be influenced by the iron-related mechanisms described by Hametmer et al. [5], but such a conclusion needs additional confirmation. There have been other attempts to define acute MS markers. It was proposed that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) chitinase 3-like 1 level may be a characteristic marker of conversion to multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome [40]; however, considering the routine determination of oligoclonal bands and problems in obtaining CSF samples, use of a serum marker may be preferable.Although serum ceruloplasmin level was reported to be positively correlated with serum CRP concentration in cardiovascular disease [41], we did not find similar correlations or correlations with WBC count in our MSpatients.The antioxidative properties of melatonin are clearly established, and it is well-accepted that melatonin supplementation during MS treatment benefits disease course and patient quality of life [23,29,30]. In this study we observed antioxidative effects of melatonin after 3-month administration in MSpatients, but significant changes in ceruloplasmin level were seen only in the interferons beta-1b group. This seems to be reasonable, because the serum ceruloplasmin levels in the interferons beta-1b group and mitoxantrone group were (similarly to pre-treated patients) significantly higher compared to controls. The similar concentrations of ceruloplasmin in the Mx group, despite melatonin treatment, may be explained by the slightly higher average age in this group, possibly resulting in higher iron storage in brain tissue.It appears that melatonin not only defends systems against free radical-induced oxidative stress, but also stimulates erythrocyte antioxidants by increasing antioxidative enzyme activity, as well as affecting the serum antioxidative system by changing ceruloplasmin concentration in MS subjects.
Conclusions
We observed elevated serum ceruloplasmin concentration in de novo-diagnosed MSpatients. Moreover, the level of serum ceruloplasmin depends on the kind of immunomodulatory treatment used in MSpatients. Higher concentrations of ceruloplasmin were observed in patients treated with interferons beta 1 b and Mx. Interestingly, 3 months of melatonin administration decreased these values to the levels found in healthy controls. We did not observe any serum ceruloplasmin changes during MS relapse. Our results confirm the potential role of ceruloplasmin in MS pathogenesis, but further studies are needed to explore the exact mechanisms involved.
Authors: Lucien C Manchester; Ana Coto-Montes; Jose Antonio Boga; Lars Peter H Andersen; Zhou Zhou; Annia Galano; Jerry Vriend; Dun-Xian Tan; Russel J Reiter Journal: J Pineal Res Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 13.007
Authors: Josa M Frischer; Stephan Bramow; Assunta Dal-Bianco; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Helmut Rauschka; Manfred Schmidbauer; Henning Laursen; Per Soelberg Sorensen; Hans Lassmann Journal: Brain Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Ana Muñoz-Jurado; Begoña M Escribano; Javier Caballero-Villarraso; Alberto Galván; Eduardo Agüera; Abel Santamaría; Isaac Túnez Journal: Inflammopharmacology Date: 2022-06-05 Impact factor: 5.093
Authors: Lyudmila V Bel'skaya; Elena A Sarf; Sergey P Shalygin; Tatyana V Postnova; Victor K Kosenok Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res Date: 2021-04-10 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Bronisława Skrzep-Poloczek; Jakub Poloczek; Elżbieta Chełmecka; Wojciech Kazura; Agnieszka Dulska; Maciej Idzik; Jerzy Jochem; Dominika Stygar Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 6.543
Authors: Tiina Kirsipuu; Anna Zadorožnaja; Julia Smirnova; Merlin Friedemann; Thomas Plitz; Vello Tõugu; Peep Palumaa Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 4.379