Rethinking Drugs from Chemistry to Therapeutic Opportunities: Pixantrone beyond Anthracyclines.

Pixantrone (6,9-bis[(2-aminoethyl)amino]benzo[g]isoquinoline-5,10-dione) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). It is popularly referred to as a novel aza-anthracenedione, and as such it is grouped with anthracycline-like drugs. Preclinical development of pixantrone was in fact tailored to retain the same antitumor activity as that of anthracyclines or other anthracenediones while also avoiding cardiotoxicity that dose-limits clinical use of anthracycline-like drugs. Preliminary data in laboratory animals showed that pixantrone was active, primarily in hematologic malignancies, but caused significantly less cardiotoxicity than doxorubicin or mitoxantrone. Pixantrone was cardiac tolerable also in animals pretreated with doxorubicin, which anticipated a therapeutic niche for pixantrone to treat patients with a history of prior exposure to anthracyclines. This is the case for patients with refractory/relapsed NHL. Pixantrone clinical development, regulatory approval, and penetration in clinical practice were nonetheless laborious if not similar to a rocky road. Structural and nominal similarities with mitoxantrone and anthracyclines may have caused a negative influence, possibly leading to a general perception that pixantrone is a "me-too" anthracycline. Recent insights suggest this is not the case. Pixantrone shows pharmacological and toxicological mechanisms of action that are difficult to reconcile with anthracycline-like drugs. Pixantrone is a new drug with its own characteristics. For example, pixantrone causes mis-segregation of genomic material in cancer cells and inhibits formation of toxic anthracycline metabolites in cardiac cells. Understanding the differences between pixantrone and anthracyclines or mitoxantrone may help one to appreciate how it worked in the phase 3 study that led to its approval in Europe and how it might work in many more patients in everyday clinical practice, were it properly perceived as a drug with its own characteristics and therapeutic potential. The road is rocky but not a dead-end.