Literature DB >> 27419826

Efficacy of primary microvascular decompression versus subsequent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.

Debebe Theodros1, C Rory Goodwin2, Matthew T Bender2, Xin Zhou2, Tomas Garzon-Muvdi2, Rafael De la Garza-Ramos2, Nancy Abu-Bonsrah1, Dimitrios Mathios2, Ari M Blitz3, Alessandro Olivi2, Benjamin Carson2, Chetan Bettegowda2, Michael Lim2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is characterized by intermittent, paroxysmal, and lancinating pain along the distribution of the trigeminal nerve. Microvascular decompression (MVD) directly addresses compression of the trigeminal nerve. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing MVD as their first surgical intervention experience greater pain control than patients who undergo subsequent MVD. METHODS A retrospective review of patient records from 1998 to 2015 identified a total of 942 patients with TN and 500 patients who underwent MVD. After excluding several cases, 306 patients underwent MVD as their first surgical intervention and 175 patients underwent subsequent MVD. Demographics and clinicopathological data and outcomes were obtained for analysis. RESULTS In patients who underwent subsequent MVD, surgical intervention was performed at an older age (55.22 vs 49.98 years old, p < 0.0001) and the duration of symptoms was greater (7.22 vs 4.45 years, p < 0.0001) than for patients in whom MVD was their first surgical intervention. Patients who underwent initial MVD had improved pain relief and no improvement in pain rates compared with those who had subsequent MVD (95.8% and 4.2% vs 90.3% and 9.7%, respectively, p = 0.0041). Patients who underwent initial MVD had significantly lower rates of facial numbness in the pre- and postoperative periods compared with patients who underwent subsequent MVD (p < 0.0001). The number of complications in both groups was similar (p = 0.4572). CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate that patients who underwent other procedures prior to MVD had less pain relief and a higher incidence of facial numbness despite rates of complications similar to patients who underwent MVD as their first surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CISS = constructive interference in steady-state; MVD = microvascular decompression; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; TN = trigeminal neuralgia; microvascular decompression; pain; trigeminal neuralgia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27419826     DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.JNS151692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  5 in total

Review 1.  The incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage after elective cranial surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Birgit Coucke; Laura Van Gerven; Steven De Vleeschouwer; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon; Tom Theys
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Treatment Outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia-A Systematic Review of Domains, Dimensions and Measures.

Authors:  Carolina Venda Nova; Joanna M Zakrzewska; Sarah R Baker; Richeal Ni Riordain
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 3.  Treatment of redo-microvascular decompression or internal neurolysis plus microvascular decompression for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: a review of long-term effectiveness and safety.

Authors:  Baisheng Wang; Li Zhang; Yanbing Yu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Surgical Treatment for Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Chang Kyu Park; Bong Jin Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-04-18

5.  Personal experience with microvascular decompression and partial sensory rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Lee; Jae Meen Lee; Chang Hwa Choi
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2020-11-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.