Literature DB >> 2741977

Pre-arrest morbidity and other correlates of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.

A L George1, B P Folk, P L Crecelius, W B Campbell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent reports on the use of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have failed to provide an applicable method to identify patients who have little chance of surviving CPR. We prospectively evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcome of 140 consecutive hospitalized patients who had cardiopulmonary arrest and received CPR, and we propose a method for predicting survival in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study period was July 1 through December 31, 1985, and the patient population consisted of 91 men and 49 women (age range, 18 to 92 years). We devised a multifactorial scoring system, the Pre-Arrest Morbidity (PAM) Index, to evaluate pre-arrest morbidity in individual patients.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven (55%) of these patients were successfully resuscitated, 34 (24.3%) were discharged from the hospital alive, and 29 (20.7%) were long-term survivors (alive three months after discharge). Multivariate analysis of pre-arrest clinical variables demonstrated a significant association with mortality for hypotension, azotemia, and age 65 years or older, although none of these factors was absolutely predictive of a fatal outcome. The PAM Index was found to correlate inversely with the frequency of successful resuscitation, and the probability of short-term and long-term survival after CPR. Patients with PAM scores of 7 or greater had an extremely low likelihood of long-term survival (less than 15%), and no patient with a score of more than 8 survived to discharge. When the PAM score was considered in multivariate analysis of pre-arrest variables, it became the only significant independent predictor of mortality.
CONCLUSION: The PAM Index may be useful in identifying patients in whom CPR may be ineffective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2741977     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(89)80479-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  36 in total

1.  A validated prediction tool for initial survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz; Robert A Berg; Yan Li; Comilla Sasson; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-25

2.  The inability of physicians to predict the outcome of in-hospital resuscitation.

Authors:  M H Ebell; G R Bergus; L Warbasse; R Bloomer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Survey of 3765 cardiopulmonary resuscitations in British hospitals (the BRESUS Study): methods and overall results.

Authors:  H Tunstall-Pedoe; L Bailey; D A Chamberlain; A K Marsden; M E Ward; D A Zideman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-23

4.  Long-term survival after successful inhospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.

Authors:  Heather L Bloom; Irfan Shukrullah; Jose R Cuellar; Michael S Lloyd; Samuel C Dudley; A Maziar Zafari
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  DNR policy and CPR practice in geriatric long-term institutional care.

Authors:  M Gordon; M Cheung
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  M H Ebell; L A Becker; H C Barry; M Hagen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Confidential inquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive care.

Authors:  P McQuillan; S Pilkington; A Allan; B Taylor; A Short; G Morgan; M Nielsen; D Barrett; G Smith; C H Collins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-20

8.  The association between age of hospitalized patients and the delivery of advanced cardiac life support.

Authors:  T R Fried; M A Miller; M D Stein; T J Wachtel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The ethical and legal implications of deactivating an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a patient with terminal cancer.

Authors:  Ruth England; Tim England; John Coggon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Resuscitation Predictor Scoring Scale for inhospital cardiac arrests.

Authors:  S Cooper; C Evans
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.