Literature DB >> 27418743

Exact sampling of the unobserved covariates in Bayesian spline models for measurement error problems.

Anindya Bhadra1, Raymond J Carroll2.   

Abstract

In truncated polynomial spline or B-spline models where the covariates are measured with error, a fully Bayesian approach to model fitting requires the covariates and model parameters to be sampled at every Markov chain Monte Carlo iteration. Sampling the unobserved covariates poses a major computational problem and usually Gibbs sampling is not possible. This forces the practitioner to use a Metropolis-Hastings step which might suffer from unacceptable performance due to poor mixing and might require careful tuning. In this article we show for the cases of truncated polynomial spline or B-spline models of degree equal to one, the complete conditional distribution of the covariates measured with error is available explicitly as a mixture of double-truncated normals, thereby enabling a Gibbs sampling scheme. We demonstrate via a simulation study that our technique performs favorably in terms of computational efficiency and statistical performance. Our results indicate up to 62 and 54 % increase in mean integrated squared error efficiency when compared to existing alternatives while using truncated polynomial splines and B-splines respectively. Furthermore, there is evidence that the gain in efficiency increases with the measurement error variance, indicating the proposed method is a particularly valuable tool for challenging applications that present high measurement error. We conclude with a demonstration on a nutritional epidemiology data set from the NIH-AARP study and by pointing out some possible extensions of the current work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian methods; Gibbs sampling; Measurement error models; Nonparametric regression; Truncated normals

Year:  2015        PMID: 27418743      PMCID: PMC4941830          DOI: 10.1007/s11222-015-9572-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Comput        ISSN: 0960-3174            Impact factor:   2.559


  3 in total

1.  Design and serendipity in establishing a large cohort with wide dietary intake distributions : the National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  A Schatzkin; A F Subar; F E Thompson; L C Harlan; J Tangrea; A R Hollenbeck; P E Hurwitz; L Coyle; N Schussler; D S Michaud; L S Freedman; C C Brown; D Midthune; V Kipnis
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Measuring dietary change in a diet intervention trial: comparing food frequency questionnaire and dietary recalls.

Authors:  Cynthia A Thomson; Anna Giuliano; Cheryl L Rock; Cheryl K Ritenbaugh; Shirley W Flatt; Susan Faerber; Vicky Newman; Bette Caan; Ellen Graver; Vern Hartz; Robin Whitacre; Felicia Parker; John P Pierce; James R Marshall
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Semiparametric bayesian analysis of nutritional epidemiology data in the presence of measurement error.

Authors:  Samiran Sinha; Bani K Mallick; Victor Kipnis; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.571

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bayesian analysis for partly linear Cox model with measurement error and time-varying covariate effect.

Authors:  Anqi Pan; Xiao Song; Hanwen Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.