| Literature DB >> 27418681 |
Jean-Baptiste Cavin1, Eglantine Voitellier1, Françoise Cluzeaud1, Nathalie Kapel2, Jean-Pierre Marmuse3, Jean-Marc Chevallier4, Simon Msika5, André Bado1, Maude Le Gall6.
Abstract
The technically easier one-anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass (MGB) is associated with similar metabolic improvements and weight loss as the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, MGB is controversial and suspected to result in greater malabsorption than RYGB. In this study, we compared macronutrient absorption and intestinal adaptation after MGB or RYGB in rats. Body weight and food intake were monitored and glucose tolerance tests were performed in rats subjected to MGB, RYGB, or sham surgery. Carbohydrate, protein, and lipid absorption was determined by fecal analyses. Intestinal remodeling was evaluated by histology and immunohistochemistry. Peptide and amino acid transporter mRNA levels were measured in the remodeled intestinal mucosa and those of anorexigenic and orexigenic peptides in the hypothalamus. The MGB and RYGB surgeries both resulted in a reduction of body weight and an improvement of glucose tolerance relative to sham rats. Hypothalamic orexigenic neuropeptide gene expression was higher in MGB rats than in RYGB or sham rats. Fecal losses of calories and proteins were greater after MGB than RYGB or sham surgery. Intestinal hyperplasia occurred after MGB and RYGB with increased jejunum diameter, higher villi, and deeper crypts than in sham rats. Peptidase and peptide or amino acid transporter genes were overexpressed in jejunal mucosa from MGB rats but not RYGB rats. In rats, MGB led to greater protein malabsorption and energy loss than RYGB. This malabsorption was not compensated by intestinal overgrowth and increased expression of peptide transporters in the jejunum.Entities:
Keywords: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; bariatric surgery; intestinal adaptation; macronutrient absorption; mini-gastric bypass
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27418681 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00197.2016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol ISSN: 0193-1857 Impact factor: 4.052