Literature DB >> 27418593

Mendelian Randomization Studies Do Not Support a Role for Vitamin D in Coronary Artery Disease.

Despoina Manousaki1, Lauren E Mokry1, Stephanie Ross1, David Goltzman1, J Brent Richards2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Observational studies support a possible association between decreased vitamin D levels and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD); however, it remains unclear whether this relationship is causal. We aimed to evaluate whether genetically lowered vitamin D levels influence the risk of CAD using a Mendelian randomization approach. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this 2-stage Mendelian randomization study, we first identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels in the SUNLIGHT consortium (n=33 996), then tested them for possible violation of Mendelian randomization assumptions. A count of risk alleles was tested for association with 25OHD levels in a separate cohort (n=2347). Alleles were weighted by their relative effect on 25OHD and tested for their combined effect on CAD in the Coronary Artery Disease Genome-Wide Replication and Meta-Analysis (CARDIoGRAM) study (22 233 cases/64 762 controls). Four single-nucleotide polymorphisms were identified to be associated with 25OHD levels, all in or near genes implicated in 25OHD synthesis, transport or metabolism. A count of these risk alleles was strongly associated with 25OHD (n=2347, F-test statistic=49.7, P=2×10(-12)). None of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with 25OHD levels were associated with CAD (all P values >0.6). The Mendelian randomization odds ratio (OR) for CAD was 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.17; P=0.93; I(2)=0) per SD decrease in log-transformed 25OHD levels. These results persisted after sensitivity analyses for population stratification and pleiotropy.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetically lowered 25OHD levels were not associated with increased risk of CAD in a large, well-powered study, suggesting that previous associations between circulating 25OHD levels and CAD are possibly confounded or due to reverse causation.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genome-Wide Association Study; Mendelian randomization analysis; coronary artery disease; single-nucleotide polymorphism; vitamin D

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27418593     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet        ISSN: 1942-3268


  41 in total

1.  Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease: Can Novel Measures of Vitamin D Status Improve Risk Prediction and Address the Vitamin D Racial Paradox?

Authors:  Samuel M Kim; Pamela L Lutsey; Erin D Michos
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep       Date:  2017-01-21

Review 2.  Vitamin D status and cardiovascular outcome.

Authors:  F Saponaro; C Marcocci; R Zucchi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  No clear support for a role for vitamin D in Parkinson's disease: A Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Susanna C Larsson; Andrew B Singleton; Mike A Nalls; J Brent Richards
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 10.338

4.  Vitamin D: Ten Beliefs.

Authors:  Lauren E Mokry; J Brent Richards
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Environmental effects of ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2017.

Authors:  A F Bais; R M Lucas; J F Bornman; C E Williamson; B Sulzberger; A T Austin; S R Wilson; A L Andrady; G Bernhard; R L McKenzie; P J Aucamp; S Madronich; R E Neale; S Yazar; A R Young; F R de Gruijl; M Norval; Y Takizawa; P W Barnes; T M Robson; S A Robinson; C L Ballaré; S D Flint; P J Neale; S Hylander; K C Rose; S-Å Wängberg; D-P Häder; R C Worrest; R G Zepp; N D Paul; R M Cory; K R Solomon; J Longstreth; K K Pandey; H H Redhwi; A Torikai; A M Heikkilä
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Skeletal and Extraskeletal Actions of Vitamin D: Current Evidence and Outstanding Questions.

Authors:  Roger Bouillon; Claudio Marcocci; Geert Carmeliet; Daniel Bikle; John H White; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Paul Lips; Craig F Munns; Marise Lazaretti-Castro; Andrea Giustina; John Bilezikian
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 7.  Vitamin D, Calcium, and Cardiovascular Disease: A"D"vantageous or "D"etrimental? An Era of Uncertainty.

Authors:  Kathleen Chin; Lawrence J Appel; Erin D Michos
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  Comprehensive Investigation of Circulating Biomarkers and Their Causal Role in Atherosclerosis-Related Risk Factors and Clinical Events.

Authors:  Daniela Zanetti; Stefan Gustafsson; Themistocles L Assimes; Erik Ingelsson
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2020-10-30

9.  Independent and Synergistic Associations of Biomarkers of Vitamin D Status With Risk of Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Lu Qi; Wenjie Ma; Yoriko Heianza; Yan Zheng; Tiange Wang; Dianjianyi Sun; Eric B Rimm; Frank B Hu; Edward Giovannucci; Christine M Albert; Kathryn M Rexrode; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 8.311

10.  Effects of vitamin D supplementation on markers for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Karin Ma Swart; Paul Lips; Ingeborg A Brouwer; Rolf Jorde; Martijn W Heymans; Guri Grimnes; Martin R Grübler; Martin Gaksch; Andreas Tomaschitz; Stefan Pilz; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Vilmundur Gudnason; Louise Wamberg; Lars Rejnmark; Christopher T Sempos; Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu; Kirsten G Dowling; George Hull; Zuzana Škrabáková; Mairead Kiely; Kevin D Cashman; Natasja M van Schoor
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.